<ul> <li> problem with breaks

Hello!

I have problem with

/
• list values.
  
  I would like to have no breaks both on Firefox and Internet Explorer.
  
  I don`t know how to do that.
  
  I tried:
  
  
  or
  
  
  and above code works in Firefox, but unfortunatly only in Firefox.
  
  I would like to have it working both on Firefox and IE.
  
  Can you help me how to do that?
  
  Thank you
  Marcin

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

AD wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have problem with

/
• list values.
  >
  > I would like to have no breaks both on Firefox and Internet Explorer.
  >
  > I don`t know how to do that.
  
  Breaks? Most times "breaks" refers to line break which has nothing to do
  with padding but whether the display of an element is inline or block. A
  URL would give a clue...
  
  
  >
  > I tried:
  >
  >
  or
  
  >
  > and above code works in Firefox, but unfortunatly only in Firefox.
  >
  > I would like to have it working both on Firefox and IE.
  
  Explicitly set values for both margins and padding if you want
  constancy. IE use margin to indent the list and FireFox uses padding. See:
  
  "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  • Fee
  
  
  • Fie
  
  
  • Foe
  
  
  • Fum
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  --
  Take care,
  
  Jonathan
  -------------------
  LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
  http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

AD wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have problem with

/
• list values.
  >
  > I would like to have no breaks both on Firefox and Internet Explorer.
  
  What do you mean by "breaks"?
  
  >
  > I don`t know how to do that.
  >
  > I tried:
  >
  >
  or
  
  >
  > and above code works in Firefox, but unfortunatly only in Firefox.
  
  What do you mean by "works"? All you're doing is specifying the left
  padding on the list, which has nothing to do with "breaks".

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

AD wrote:
>
> I have problem with

/
• list values.
  >
  > I would like to have no breaks both on Firefox and Internet Explorer.
  
  I'll assume English is not your native language and something is being
  lost in the translation. The word "breaks" doesn't have a lot to do with
  lists, except perhaps where a new line occurs.
  
  >
  or
  
  >
  > and above code works in Firefox, but unfortunatly only in Firefox.
  
  As Mr Little said, the left margin and padding properties are used
  differently by different browsers. You do need to set both properties if
  you want consistent results.
  
  If your desire is to get rid of the default left indents, try this:
  
  ul {
  margin-left: 0;
  padding-left: 20px;
  }
  
  You may need to adjust the padding value a little, but that should be
  close. If you want some other effect, then drawing a picture would help.
  
  --
  Berg

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
>>

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

>

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Harlan Messinger wrote:
>
>> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>>
>>>>

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Harlan Messinger wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>
>>>

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

On 9 avr, 10:56, "AD" wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have problem with

/
• list values.
  >
  > I would like to have no breaks both on Firefox and Internet Explorer.
  
  Like everyone else has asked you or told you: breaks could mean line
  breaks... but we're not sure.
  Did you want to create an horizontal list of links for navigation
  purposes?
  
  >
  > I don`t know how to do that.
  >
  > I tried:
  >
  >
  or
  
  >
  > and above code works in Firefox, but unfortunatly only in Firefox.
  >
  > I would like to have it working both on Firefox and IE.
  
  When you post webpage requirements like that, you always need to be
  much more specific. "IE" could mean IE 6 and/or IE 7 and "Firefox"
  could mean Firefox 1.5, Firefox 2 or Firefox 3... We don't know... and
  there are great differences between IE 6 and IE 7.
  
  >
  > Can you help me how to do that?
  >
  > Thank you
  > Marcin
  
  Yes. Read carefully this webpage:
  
  Consistent List Indentation
  http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Consistent_List_Indenta tion
  
  "(...)if you want consistent rendering of lists between Gecko,
  Internet Explorer, and Opera, you need to set both the left margin and
  left padding of the
  element. (...)"
  
  Regards, G=E9rard
  --
  Internet Explorer 7 bugs
  http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/MSIE7Bugs/

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Blinky the Shark wrote:

> I didn't catch what you were saying. I see now what you meant. But I'd
> just call that parody. I think they also misspelled "fo".

Don't think so, Jack...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22fee+fie+foe+fum%22&b tnG=Google+Search
"fee fie foe fum" - Google Search


--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Harlan Messinger wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Harlan Messinger wrote:
>>
>>> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>>>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> I didn't catch what you were saying. I see now what you meant. But I'd
>> just call that parody. I think they also misspelled "fo".
>
> Don't think so, Jack...
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22fee+fie+foe+fum%22&b tnG=Google+Search
> "fee fie foe fum" - Google Search

Yeah, I Googled, too. I coud've swarn I came up with hits including "fo"
back in the nursery rhyme.

Guess not, Ralph.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
>> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>>
>>> I didn't catch what you were saying. I see now what you meant. But I'd
>>> just call that parody. I think they also misspelled "fo".
>> Don't think so, Jack...
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22fee+fie+foe+fum%22&b tnG=Google+Search
>> "fee fie foe fum" - Google Search
>
> Yeah, I Googled, too. I coud've swarn I came up with hits including "fo"
> back in the nursery rhyme.
>
> Guess not, Ralph.

Was a 'playful' reference to the fellow with the hyper-vigorous legume
that encounters another fellow with a hyperactive pituitary and
disturbing culinary preferences...

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>
>>> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>>>
>>>> I didn't catch what you were saying. I see now what you meant.
>>>> But I'd just call that parody. I think they also misspelled "fo".
>>> Don't think so, Jack...
>>>
>>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22fee+fie+foe+fum%22&b tnG=Googl
>>> e+Search "fee fie foe fum" - Google Search
>>
>> Yeah, I Googled, too. I coud've swarn I came up with hits including
>> "fo" back in the nursery rhyme.
>>
>> Guess not, Ralph.
>
> Was a 'playful' reference to the fellow with the hyper-vigorous legume
> that encounters another fellow with a hyperactive pituitary and
> disturbing culinary preferences...

I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Neredbojias wrote:

> I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.
>

That's what they all claim...

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:

> Neredbojias wrote:
>
>> I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.
>>
>
> That's what they all claim...

All right, I admit I've been tempted. But when the mood is right, I simply
can't get my hand around it.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Neredbojias wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:
>
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>
>>> I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.
>>>
>> That's what they all claim...
>
> All right, I admit I've been tempted. But when the mood is right, I simply
> can't get my hand around it.
>

Wow such petite hands!

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:

> Neredbojias wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:
>>
>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.
>>>>
>>> That's what they all claim...
>>
>> All right, I admit I've been tempted. But when the mood is right, I
>> simply can't get my hand around it.
>>
>
> Wow such petite hands!

I surrender...

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Neredbojias wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:
>
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>> On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.
>>>>>
>>>> That's what they all claim...
>>>
>>> All right, I admit I've been tempted. But when the mood is right, I
>>> simply can't get my hand around it.
>>>
>> Wow such petite hands!
>
> I surrender...
>

I think that have pills for that now ;-)

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

On 2008-04-09, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> I didn't catch what you were saying. I see now what you meant. But I'd
>> just call that parody. I think they also misspelled "fo".
>
> Don't think so, Jack...
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22fee+fie+foe+fum%22&b tnG=Google+Search
> "fee fie foe fum" - Google Search

In my youth, I always saw it as "Fe Fi Fo Fum", and there are
plenty of matches returned by Google to support that.


--
Chris F.A. Johnson, webmaster
============================================================ =======
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

Re: <ul> <li> problem with breaks

Jonathan N. Little wrote:

> Neredbojias wrote:
>> On 10 Apr 2008, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote:
>>
>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a hyper-vigorous legume, myself, but I never play with it.
>>>>
>>> That's what they all claim...
>>
>> All right, I admit I've been tempted. But when the mood is right, I
>> simply can't get my hand around it.
>>
>>
> Wow such petite hands!

And remember: no glove, no love.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net