Bookmarks

Yahoo Gmail Google Facebook Delicious Twitter Reddit Stumpleupon Myspace Digg

Search queries

WWWXXX DACB, wwwxxx,nvif, why atm producer might be held liable for economic injury, wwwxxxy=ServiceLogin, w2ksp4.exe, WwwxxXdbf, procmail "FROM_MAILER" patch, Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at /usr/local/sbin/apxs line 86. , wwwxxx vim, mysql closing table and opening table

Links

XODOX
Impressum

#1: ppsqlodbc_09_00_0200 bugs ?

Posted on 2010-10-31 18:03:51 by r.melizzi

------=_Part_459951_7534817.1288544631677
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In my program sources code, I have the following querydef with returning expression:

.......... "VALUES ( ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,now(),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, now(),? ) returning to_char(""INS_DATA"", 'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS') as pippo;"


Using the new ODBC: "psqlodbc_09_00_0200", I have an error and no returned parameter.

but with the same sources code of my program,
and using a previous version of psqlodbc (for example, psqlodbc_08_03_0200),
all is correct.
(I thing that the last version of psqlodbc_09_00_0200 may have somethings of difference)

Many thanks for your help
By

------=_Part_459951_7534817.1288544631677
Content-Type: text/html;charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In my program sources code, &nbsp;I have the following&nbsp;querydef with <=
STRONG>returning expression</STRONG>:<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;.......... "VALUES=
( ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, ?,?,?,?,?,?,=
?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,now(),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,now(),? ) &nbsp;<STRONG>ret=
urning to_char(""INS_DATA"", 'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS') as pippo</STRONG>;"<BR><BR=
><BR>Using&nbsp; the new ODBC:&nbsp; "<STRONG>psqlodbc_09_00_0200", &nbsp;<=
/STRONG>I have an error and no returned parameter.<BR><!-- DO NOT REMOVE TH=
IS USED TO CALC LENGHT OF PAGE --><BR>but with the same&nbsp;sources code o=
f my program,<BR>and&nbsp;using a previous version of psqlodbc (for example=
, psqlodbc_08_03_0200),<BR>all is correct.<BR>(I thing that the last versio=
n of psqlodbc_09_00_0200 may have somethings of difference)<BR><BR>Many tha=
nks for your help<BR>By<BR> =
=
=
=

------=_Part_459951_7534817.1288544631677--

Report this message

#2: Re: ppsqlodbc_09_00_0200 bugs ?

Posted on 2010-10-31 23:01:11 by z-saito

Hi

I will check it tonight time.
Can you send me the mylog of psqlODBC?
Thanks.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


"r.melizzi@tin.it"
>In my program sources code, I have the following querydef with returning expression:
>
> .......... "VALUES ( ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, ?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,now(),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?, now(),? ) returning to_char(""INS_DATA"", 'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS') as pippo;"
>
>
>Using the new ODBC: "psqlodbc_09_00_0200", I have an error and no returned parameter.
>
>but with the same sources code of my program,
>and using a previous version of psqlodbc (for example, psqlodbc_08_03_0200),
>all is correct.
>(I thing that the last version of psqlodbc_09_00_0200 may have somethings of difference)
>
>Many thanks for your help
>By
>



--
Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc

Report this message