Procmail Forward

I am setting up a mail server to filter incoming mail for spam and
viruses then forward the mail to a 2nd mail server where it will be
delivered to the appropriate accounts and accessed by my users.

I have already setup the spam mail server to filter the spam, now I
just need to set it up so the mail is forwarded to the 2nd server.

I am using procmail + Spamassassin to do this. Spamassassin I have
setup fine and it is working.

I need the To: (CC: or BCC:) header to remain in tact while sending it
to the 2nd server. So that the 2nd server can deliver it appropriately.


What would the procmail filter be to do this?

Leslie

Re: Procmail Forward

On comp.mail.misc, in
<1111447115.891004.117930@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"ieslie@yahoo.com" wrote:

> I am setting up a mail server to filter incoming mail for spam
> and viruses then forward the mail to a 2nd mail server where it
> will be delivered to the appropriate accounts and accessed by
> my users.
>
> I have already setup the spam mail server to filter the spam,
> now I just need to set it up so the mail is forwarded to the
> 2nd server.
>
> I am using procmail + Spamassassin to do this. Spamassassin I
> have setup fine and it is working.
>
> I need the To: (CC: or BCC:) header to remain in tact while
> sending it to the 2nd server. So that the 2nd server can
> deliver it appropriately.
>
>
> What would the procmail filter be to do this?
>
> Leslie
>


The above sure reminds me of this post:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1110211523.245907.27131 0@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com

A similar questions, equally garbled, and the OP disappeared
when asked perfectly logical questions about his/her problem.

AC

--
Please check out my homepage at:
http://angel.1jh.com./nanae/kooks/alanconnor.html

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.10) (was Re: Procmail Forward)

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-18963-1111493659-0002
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Beavis writes:

> On comp.mail.misc, in
> <1111447115.891004.117930@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "ieslie@yahoo.com" wrote:
>
>>
>> What would the procmail filter be to do this?
>>
>> Leslie
>>
>
>
> The above sure reminds me of this post:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1110211523.245907.27131 0@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
>
> A similar questions, equally garbled, and the OP disappeared
> when asked perfectly logical questions about his/her problem.

Ok, Beavis, here are a couple of logical questions for you. Gather around,
everybody, and watch Beavis do his disappearing act.

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.10)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

2) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

3) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

4) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

5) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

6) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

7) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

8) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

9) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

10) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?


--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-18963-1111493659-0002
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCQAwbx9p3GYHlUOIRAt0xAJ4gVFNir9/g9TCRQs2FuVSx6Q3mJgCZ AQ6c
jGi74us8HSPRwsV13zgc/Kc=
=EEoy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-18963-1111493659-0002--