Look At These Fools

Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
bother to look at.

(personal entries deleted)

From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 08:41:42 2005
Subject: Re: Waiting for CDs is so boring, so we fixed
it with direct download Folder: /dev/null 2379

From eangylore@city-of-oxford.com Sun Apr 17 17:56:08
2005 Subject: Never Pay Retail for Printer Ink Again
yuq Folder: /dev/null 3357

From ojograb@pipex-sa.net Sun Apr 17 17:56:09 2005
Subject: congresswoman Cleocin Phosphate Injection is a
narcotic similar to th Folder: /dev/null 7826

From support@findthedirt9.info Sun Apr 17 17:56:10 2005
Subject: One of our website users is researching -
alanconnor@earthlink.net Folder: /dev/null 1669

From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 18:56:19 2005
Subject: Re: One of our website users is researching -
alanconnor@earthlink.ne Folder: /dev/null 2402

[Isn't that nice. Maybe they should consider getting
a life. AFTER they kiss my ass.]

From info@elheraldodeguatemala.com.gt Mon Apr 18
01:59:34 2005 Subject: El Heraldo de Guatemala Folder:
/dev/null 10449

From Txovkfa@demetrio.com Mon Apr 18 01:59:35 2005
Subject: Accupril - Used to treat high blood pressure
and heart failure dissem Folder: /dev/null 8011

From alanconnor@earthlink.net Mon Apr 18 03:38:39
2005 Subject: Re: Accupril - Used to treat high blood
pressure and heart failure di Folder: /dev/null 2378

[Some fool forwarding spam to me.]

From alanconnor@earthlink.net Mon Apr 18 04:48:05 2005
Subject: Re: Act Now Before It's Too Late!! Folder:
/dev/null 2409

------------------

Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from
myself.

You can't beat my program. Period.

Even if you had brains, you couldn't.

AC

--
alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
Use your real return address or I'll never know you
even tried to mail me.

~

Re: Look At These Fools

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21792-1113826656-0001
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Beavis writes:

>
> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.

Thank you, Beavis. Now, would you mind answering question #10, below?


FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.10)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

2) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

3) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

4) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

5) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

6) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

7) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

8) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

9) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

10) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?


--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21792-1113826656-0001
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCY6Vgx9p3GYHlUOIRArJ8AJwLOOjHmMs59F7dL0Kaf7MT7RP/AQCc C2Tb
V7KH3clPkFLt6K53AUS0AMc=
=wuvS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21792-1113826656-0001--

Re: Look At These Fools

On comp.mail.misc, in <0lN8e.10138$lP1.3651@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "Alan Connor" wrote:
>
>
>
> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.
>
> (personal entries deleted)
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 08:41:42 2005
> Subject: Re: Waiting for CDs is so boring, so we fixed
> it with direct download Folder: /dev/null 2379
>
> From eangylore@city-of-oxford.com Sun Apr 17 17:56:08
> 2005 Subject: Never Pay Retail for Printer Ink Again
> yuq Folder: /dev/null 3357
>
> From ojograb@pipex-sa.net Sun Apr 17 17:56:09 2005
> Subject: congresswoman Cleocin Phosphate Injection is a
> narcotic similar to th Folder: /dev/null 7826
>
> From support@findthedirt9.info Sun Apr 17 17:56:10 2005
> Subject: One of our website users is researching -
> alanconnor@earthlink.net Folder: /dev/null 1669
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 18:56:19 2005
> Subject: Re: One of our website users is researching -
> alanconnor@earthlink.ne Folder: /dev/null 2402
>
> [Isn't that nice. Maybe they should consider getting
> a life. AFTER they kiss my ass.]
>
> From info@elheraldodeguatemala.com.gt Mon Apr 18
> 01:59:34 2005 Subject: El Heraldo de Guatemala Folder:
> /dev/null 10449
>
> From Txovkfa@demetrio.com Mon Apr 18 01:59:35 2005
> Subject: Accupril - Used to treat high blood pressure
> and heart failure dissem Folder: /dev/null 8011
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Mon Apr 18 03:38:39
> 2005 Subject: Re: Accupril - Used to treat high blood
> pressure and heart failure di Folder: /dev/null 2378
>
> [Some fool forwarding spam to me.]
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Mon Apr 18 04:48:05 2005
> Subject: Re: Act Now Before It's Too Late!! Folder:
> /dev/null 2409
>
> ------------------
>
> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from
> myself.
>
> You can't beat my program. Period.
>
> Even if you had brains, you couldn't.
>
> AC
>
> --
> alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
> Use your real return address or I'll never know you
> even tried to mail me.
>

Note that this has been going on for YEARS. These clowns
have NEVER gotten any of their drivel as far as my
mail client.

That's the procmail log. Instead of delivering the mail
to me, it goes to /dev/null.

Does their repeated failure slow them down? Do they, like
any creature with the brains of a sparrow, try for a while,
and then, when they realize it isn't working, try something
else or maybe get a life?

Nope.

They just stand there and kick the steel door until their
feet are crippled.

I don't have to kick their asses, they kick their OWN asses.

While I'm busy doing other things and completely unaware
of their activities.

AC


--
If you posted to me, and I didn't reply to your post, it is
because I didn't read it. If I didn't read it, I won't be reading
any responses to it. Nor will I be reading any other posts by
that alias, regardless of the subject, nor any responses to them.

Re: Look At These Fools

Alan Connor wrote:
> Does their repeated failure slow them down? Do they, like
> any creature with the brains of a sparrow, try for a while,
> and then, when they realize it isn't working, try something
> else or maybe get a life?

Does anyone in the universe except mr connor CARE about his mail logs? Do
the spammers even care? Will Mary realise Burt's not Burt and the real
Burt's been abducted by aliens? Will Jodie keep his son, or dump his friend?
Some of these questions and many more won't be answered in the next episode
of....



Soap.

Re: Look At These Fools

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04 +0000, Alan Connor wrote:

>
> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.
>



> AC


You seem to have missed answering the question I put to you a little while
ago (in another thread) , allow me to ask it again ...

"I'm curious, why do you accept the mail and then pass it to /dev/null ?

Surely it would be better to reject such mails while the original SMTP
session is still active, both because it saves your bandwidth and also
because the sender, assuming it's not a spam mail, has a chance to see an
error and realise their mail wasn't delivered?"

Cheers

James

Re: Look At These Fools

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21792-1113833349-0008
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James writes:

> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04 +0000, Alan Connor wrote:
>
>>
>> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
>> bother to look at.
>>
>
>
>
>> AC
>
>
> You seem to have missed answering the question I put to you a little while
> ago (in another thread) , allow me to ask it again ...
>
> "I'm curious, why do you accept the mail and then pass it to /dev/null ?
>
> Surely it would be better to reject such mails while the original SMTP
> session is still active, both because it saves your bandwidth and also
> because the sender, assuming it's not a spam mail, has a chance to see an
> error and realise their mail wasn't delivered?"

I can answer that one.

Beavis is just a pissant on an Earthlink modem dialup. The only time he
actually runs a real mail server is in his dreams.



--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21792-1113833349-0008
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCY7+Fx9p3GYHlUOIRArVOAJ0RCRE08wWD5axMxIEjgeCcBZEViACf W+AP
rxXAM1un0L0W6FBnpZnMHwE=
=vPKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21792-1113833349-0008--

Re: Look At These Fools

Alan Connor wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04 GMT:

> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.

I don't bother looking at it either, hence ....

[ snip, snip, snip ...... ]

> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from myself.

Ah, so you do it too! ;-)

Always good to hear from you, Alan. Keep up the good work!

> AC

--
Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
Email: aacm@muuc.dee; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
(like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").

Re: Look At These Fools

On comp.os.linux.misc, in <2e114d.36.ln@acm.acm>, "Alan
Mackenzie" wrote:


> Alan Connor wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04
> GMT:
>
>> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely bother
>> to look at.
>
> I don't bother looking at it either, hence ....
>
> [ snip, snip, snip ...... ]

You looked at it.

And it obviously pissed you off.

>
>> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from myself.
>
> Ah, so you do it too! ;-)

I can't imagine why I would want to mail you, so this is
hardly a problem.

>
> Always good to hear from you, Alan. Keep up the good work!
>
>> AC
>

I sure will. Too bad you can't send stupid shit like this to
my mailboxes, isn't it?

Trolls and spammers REALLY hate Challenge-Response systems,
because they can't beat them.

Challenge-Response systems reject anonymous mail.

Doesn't your heart just bleed for them?

AC

--
Pass-list --> Block-list --> Challenge-Response
The key to taking control of your mailboxes
http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp

Re: Look At These Fools

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:06:01 +0000, Beavis pressed the "play" button
again:

> Trolls and spammers REALLY hate Challenge-Response systems, because they
> can't beat them.
> Challenge-Response systems reject anonymous mail.
>
You appeared to have missed the questions below - again.
People will begin to think you have no answer, or at least the three of
four who may still believe your drivel.

Having received several challenges in response to mail I hadn't sent, I'd
be especially interested to hear your responses to #1 and #8.

But, since I'm in your killfile (again - it seems to leak, Alan!) *and*
still posting using my exceedingly common real name, your telepathic
system should prevent you from seeing this.
Reminds me of Zaphod's danger-sensing shades.

=============================================

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.10)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

=============================================

1) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

2) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

3) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

4) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

5) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

6) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

7) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

8) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

9) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

10) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?




B.
--
Microsoft: Re-inventing square wheels.

Re: Look At These Fools

In article <0lN8e.10138$lP1.3651@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, Alan
Connor says...

> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.

For some values of "rare". Your weekly log posts are amusing; but little
more than that.

--
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Re: Look At These Fools

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:51:41 +0000, NormanM wrote:

> For some values of "rare". Your weekly log posts are amusing; but little
> more than that.

For someone who doesn't look at his logs, he sure seems to spend a good
bit of time gloating over them....

Just for grins and giggles, I went through my logs; 155 emails rejected
through DNSBLs, invalid domains and non-existent senders, 16 caught by
dspam, and 3 UCEs got through.... Not bad, but I know at least one person
who gets over 3K messages rejected daily. I wonder how that compares to
AC's 'perfect' filter? :-)

--

use munged address above to email me
SpamTrap DoMeNow@seiner.com

Re: Look At These Fools

On comp.os.linux.misc, in <0lN8e.10138$lP1.3651@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "Alan Connor" wrote:
>
>
>
> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.
>
> (personal entries deleted)
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 08:41:42 2005
> Subject: Re: Waiting for CDs is so boring, so we fixed
> it with direct download Folder: /dev/null 2379
>
> From eangylore@city-of-oxford.com Sun Apr 17 17:56:08
> 2005 Subject: Never Pay Retail for Printer Ink Again
> yuq Folder: /dev/null 3357
>
> From ojograb@pipex-sa.net Sun Apr 17 17:56:09 2005
> Subject: congresswoman Cleocin Phosphate Injection is a
> narcotic similar to th Folder: /dev/null 7826
>
> From support@findthedirt9.info Sun Apr 17 17:56:10 2005
> Subject: One of our website users is researching -
> alanconnor@earthlink.net Folder: /dev/null 1669
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 18:56:19 2005
> Subject: Re: One of our website users is researching -
> alanconnor@earthlink.ne Folder: /dev/null 2402
>
> [Isn't that nice. Maybe they should consider getting
> a life. AFTER they kiss my ass.]
>
> From info@elheraldodeguatemala.com.gt Mon Apr 18
> 01:59:34 2005 Subject: El Heraldo de Guatemala Folder:
> /dev/null 10449
>
> From Txovkfa@demetrio.com Mon Apr 18 01:59:35 2005
> Subject: Accupril - Used to treat high blood pressure
> and heart failure dissem Folder: /dev/null 8011
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Mon Apr 18 03:38:39
> 2005 Subject: Re: Accupril - Used to treat high blood
> pressure and heart failure di Folder: /dev/null 2378
>
> [Some fool forwarding spam to me.]
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Mon Apr 18 04:48:05 2005
> Subject: Re: Act Now Before It's Too Late!! Folder:
> /dev/null 2409
>
> ------------------
>
> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from
> myself.
>
> You can't beat my program. Period.
>
> Even if you had brains, you couldn't.
>
> AC
>
> --
> alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
> Use your real return address or I'll never know you
> even tried to mail me.

Isn't it wonderful? I post a thread entitled "Look
at these Fools", and a bunch of fools respond to
be looked over.

I wonder if anyone but your own sockpuppets read
your posts anymore? I certainly don't.

Not-very-bright 7-year olds with their Mommy's
computers are boring as hell.

Here's the latest post from these morons on comp.mail.misc,
which they apparently think is comp.losers.misc:

[Bubba Jackso] Why does Alan Connor spend so much time spamming?

Just stay out of my mailboxes, fools.

That's an order. One I can and do enforce.

If you don't like my mail filter, you are always free
to eat shit.

The taste should be quite familiar to you, considering
how often it comes OUT of your mouths.

Have fun. I've been ignoring your idiot posts for years,
and can do it forever. Really. It's not hard at all.

AC

--
Pass-list --> Block-list --> Challenge-Response
The key to taking control of your mailboxes
http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp

Re: Look At These Fools

Alan Connor wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:06:01 GMT:
> On comp.os.linux.misc, in <2e114d.36.ln@acm.acm>, "Alan Mackenzie"
> wrote:

Hi!

>> Alan Connor wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04
>> GMT:

>>> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely bother to look
>>> at.

>> I don't bother looking at it either, hence ....

>> [ snip, snip, snip ...... ]

> You looked at it.

OK, I admit it! But perhaps you too look at these logs oftener than you
admit.

> And it obviously pissed you off.

No, not at all. Why should it?

>>> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from myself.

>> Ah, so you do it too! ;-)

> I can't imagine why I would want to mail you, so this is hardly a
> problem.

No, it was just the novel notion of somebody kill-filing himself. I
couldn't resist it. ;-)

>> Always good to hear from you, Alan. Keep up the good work!

>>> AC

> I sure will. Too bad you can't send stupid shit like this to my
> mailboxes, isn't it?

Hey, don't be like that. You've given me several good tips over the past
year or two, and they're appreciated. Thank you!

> Trolls and spammers REALLY hate Challenge-Response systems, because
> they can't beat them.

I'll try sending you some mail sometime, just to see how
easy/difficult/frustrating/WTH's_the_fuss_about it really is. Maybe I'll
write up an independent user report here.

> Challenge-Response systems reject anonymous mail.

From whom?

> Doesn't your heart just bleed for them?

For trolls and spammers? Yes, actually, it does. It stinks getting
continually bombarded by their outpourings, but it would be far, far
worse actually to _be_ one of them.

> AC

You put your email in, you take your email out.
> Pass-list --> Block-list --> Challenge-Response
You do the hoquey coquey, and you turn around.
That's what it's all about!

Have a good Wednesday, Alan.

--
Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
Email: aacm@muuc.dee; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
(like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a").

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.20) (was Re: Look At This Beavi

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-2651-1113942381-0002
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Beavis writes:

> I wonder if anyone but your own sockpuppets read
> your posts anymore? I certainly don't.

FAQ question #5, see below.

> Here's the latest post from these morons on comp.mail.misc,
> which they apparently think is comp.losers.misc:

And whose fault is that, Beavis?

> [Bubba Jackso] Why does Alan Connor spend so much time spamming?
>
> Just stay out of my mailboxes, fools.
>
> That's an order. One I can and do enforce.

FAQ question #11.

> If you don't like my mail filter, you are always free
> to eat shit.
>
> The taste should be quite familiar to you, considering
> how often it comes OUT of your mouths.

FAQ question #12.

> Have fun. I've been ignoring your idiot posts for years,
> and can do it forever. Really. It's not hard at all.

That's a #6, and a wrap.


FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.20)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

2) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

3) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

4) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

5) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

6) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

7) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

8) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

9) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

10) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?

11) How exactly do you "enforce" an "order" to stay out of your mailbox,
supposedly (http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)? Since you issue this "order" about
every week, or so, apparently nobody wants to follow it. What are you going
to do about it?

12) What's with your fascination with shit? (also http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?


--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-2651-1113942381-0002
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCZWltx9p3GYHlUOIRAvecAJ0Tk4GUqvL1Nlj8wz78NDwhwe+UdACe NaYu
DzAeUdzoogOTdIWxKb7gJMg=
=xlBh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-2651-1113942381-0002--

Re: Look At These Fools

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:15:35 +0000, Beavis drooled:

> Not-very-bright 7-year olds with their Mommy's
> computers are boring as hell.
>
Ah yes, this looks familiar.

> Have fun. I've been ignoring your idiot posts for years,
> and can do it forever.
>
Liar. You still read them anyway, and sometimes post a sockpuppet
response - poorly disguised, of course: but only an idiot like you would
be convinced, Beavis.
<4V_8e.10573$lP1.2705@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>

BTW, don't forget to avoid answering Sam's questions. Do please continue
confirming what a waste of space you are.


B.
--
Now playing: "Toast, wunnerful Toast!"

Re: Look At These Fools

Alan Connor wrote:
> On comp.os.linux.misc, in <2e114d.36.ln@acm.acm>, "Alan
> Mackenzie" wrote:
>
>
>
>>Alan Connor wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04
>>GMT:
>>
>>
>>>Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely bother
>>>to look at.
>>
>>I don't bother looking at it either, hence ....
>>
>>[ snip, snip, snip ...... ]
>
>
> You looked at it.
>
> And it obviously pissed you off.
>
>
>>>Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from myself.
>>
>>Ah, so you do it too! ;-)
>
>
> I can't imagine why I would want to mail you, so this is
> hardly a problem.
>
>
>>Always good to hear from you, Alan. Keep up the good work!
>>
>>
>>>AC
>>
>
> I sure will. Too bad you can't send stupid shit like this to
> my mailboxes, isn't it?
>
> Trolls and spammers REALLY hate Challenge-Response systems,
> because they can't beat them.
>
> Challenge-Response systems reject anonymous mail.
>
> Doesn't your heart just bleed for them?
>
> AC
>
Take Control of your INBOX get Thundwerbird and filter out the trash
www.getthunderbird.com

Re: Look At These Fools

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:06:01 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:
> On comp.os.linux.misc, in <2e114d.36.ln@acm.acm>, "Alan
> Mackenzie" wrote:
>
>
>> Alan Connor wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:02:04
>> GMT:
>>
>>> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely bother
>>> to look at.
>>
>> I don't bother looking at it either, hence ....
>>
>> [ snip, snip, snip ...... ]
>
> You looked at it.
>
> And it obviously pissed you off.
>
>>
>>> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from myself.
>>
>> Ah, so you do it too! ;-)
>
> I can't imagine why I would want to mail you, so this is
> hardly a problem.
>
>>
>> Always good to hear from you, Alan. Keep up the good work!
>>
>>> AC
>>
>
> I sure will. Too bad you can't send stupid shit like this to
> my mailboxes, isn't it?
>
> Trolls and spammers REALLY hate Challenge-Response systems,
> because they can't beat them.
>
> Challenge-Response systems reject anonymous mail.
>
> Doesn't your heart just bleed for them?
>
> AC
>

Is this just Alan arguing with himself?

--
_________________________________________
NetworkElf: Super Genius, Computer Guy, Harley Owner!
Blindly serving the covert purposes of the
criminal-minded maniac behind Spews since 2003.

Re: Look At These Fools

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Alan Connor wrote:
> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.
>
> (personal entries deleted)
>
> From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 08:41:42 2005
> Subject: Re: Waiting for CDs is so boring, so we fixed
> it with direct download Folder: /dev/null 2379
>
> ...
> ------------------
>
> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from
> myself.
>
> You can't beat my program. Period.
>
> Even if you had brains, you couldn't.

So, why did you expose your own mailbox in the text of your message yet munge
it in the headers? AC screwed up.... And he calls them morons....

Re: Look At These Fools

Alan Connor wrote:
> Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> bother to look at.
>

>
> Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from
> myself.
>
> You can't beat my program. Period.
>
> Even if you had brains, you couldn't.
>

let us all concentrate our thoughts and praise the great Alan Connor. He
shall lead us, cause he is the smartest. halleluja.

And after all: he is obviously a sucessful troll. Such a simple email
and look at all the people participating on the tread. including me.
Nobody writing in this thread should complain about the great AC :)

Maybe he is indeed not just a moron but really the choosen one ;)
halleluja !!

p


--
http://www.goldfisch.at/know_list

Re: Look At These Fools

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, peter pilsl wrote:
> Maybe he is indeed not just a moron but really the choosen one ;) halleluja !!

That's right: He's the chosen moron of the decade! :-)

Re: Look At These Fools

D. Stussy wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Alan Connor wrote:
> > Here's a wee excerpt from my mail logs, which I rarely
> > bother to look at.
> >
> > (personal entries deleted)
> >
> > From alanconnor@earthlink.net Sun Apr 17 08:41:42 2005
> > Subject: Re: Waiting for CDs is so boring, so we fixed
> > it with direct download Folder: /dev/null 2379
> >
> > ...
> > ------------------
> >
> > Bunch of morons that think I don't killfile mail from
> > myself.
> >
> > You can't beat my program. Period.
> >
> > Even if you had brains, you couldn't.
>
> So, why did you expose your own mailbox in the text of your message yet munge
> it in the headers? AC screwed up.... And he calls them morons....

Well, there is actually a good reason, which I won't mention, because
we don't want AC to score a point, now do we? So can we consider this
issue to be ex, i.e. over?