Re: Address munging

Alan Connor wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:10:09 -0400, Steve Baker wrote:
>
>>
>>On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:37:42 GMT, Alan Connor wrote:

>>>>You losing interest in a discussion doesn't make those who are still
>>>>interested trolls.
>
>>>Anyone who isn't an idiot-trouble-maker-without-a-life (troll) that is
>>>seriously proposing the elimination of the Netiquette is a lot worse
>>>than a troll.
>>
>> Too funny. Beavis, the Netiquette he's talking about is the
>>Netiquette that YOU'RE violating with your use of zzzzzz@xxx.yyy as an
>>email address.
>>
>>Steve Baker
>
> That's a very small part of the Netiquette, Steve, one that doesn't
> interfere with the smooth functioning of the Usenet regardless of whether
> one follows it or not, and is plainly out-dated.
>
> Trolls and spam were basically non-existent then.
>
> The quality of Usenet discussions are not interfered with in any way by
> your inability to send abusive mails to people, which, judging from
> this post, you are certainly inclined to do, having snipped everything
> from my post except that which gave you an excuse to call me names
> like a delinquent child.
>
> It is good that you had to post this here, where all could see it, rather
> than sneaking a nasty mail to me instead. This way we can see who you
> are. And ignore any further posts from you.
>
> Good RFCs are up-dated, not thrown out as was being suggested.

>

One rule for you another rule for everyone else eh Alan?! I am going to
refer you to sociopaths anonymous.