"Sam"

am 28.05.2005 13:14:49 von Alan Connor

Note: I don't read the posts of "Sam", regardless of
which of his/her hundreds of aliases he/she is using
at the moment. My newsfilter even eradicates the
Subject lines of his/her posts. This has been the
case for years, although the poor lost soul never
seems to accept this reality.

He/she often forges my name, so be sure to check
the headers of any posts that have my name.
I only post with Earthlink, and they wouldn't
give him an account for any amount of money:
He has a record with them of filing false
complaints against myself and others.

For example: He forges my name all the time,
but when I forged his ONCE, he complained
to Earthlink. So I just sent them a digest
of all the posts of his where he forged my
name and he has been on their shit list
every since then: He HAD to use his real
return address to get them to even take
his complaint seriously. Ha! Ha! Ha!

His rudimentary computer skills can't possibly
fool them. Hell, they don't fool ANYONE.

AC

--
Please visit my home page:
http://angel.1jh.com./nanae/kooks/alanconnor.html

Beavis, by the numbers.

am 28.05.2005 16:14:13 von Sam

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-17291-1117289655-0001
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Alan Connor writes:

> Note: I don't read the posts of "Sam", regardless of

Beavis FAQ, question #6.

> which of his/her hundreds of aliases he/she is using
> at the moment.

Beavis FAQ, question #5.

> My newsfilter even eradicates the
> Subject lines of his/her posts.

Beavis FAQ, question #9.

> He/she often forges my name, so be sure to check
> the headers of any posts that have my name.

I suppose that's a various of #5.

> I only post with Earthlink, and they wouldn't
> give him an account for any amount of money:

Beavis, why would I want to replace my commercial DSL pipe with a slow-ass
modem dialup?

> He has a record with them of filing false
> complaints against myself and others.

And that's why they told you to stop violating Earthlink's TOS, and you came
in here afterwards, pissing and moaning?

> For example: He forges my name all the time,

Beavis FAQ, question #13 *NEW*.

> but when I forged his ONCE, he complained
> to Earthlink. So I just sent them a digest
> of all the posts of his

And they promptly marked your account "verified kookbag, next complaint will
terminate the account".

> where he forged my
> name

#13, again.

> and he has been on their shit list
> every since then:

Prove it, Beavis. I dare you to post another forgery in my name, and then
we'll see who's on whose shitlist.

Come on, Beavis, what are you afraid of? Losing your Earthlink account?

Stupid Beavis. Now, by refusing to do that, he'll implicitly admit that he
was shooting his piehole off.

Beavis, this happened over a year ago, and your ass is still sore. Get over
it.

> He HAD to use his real
> return address to get them to even take
> his complaint seriously. Ha! Ha! Ha!

Beavis, I have a newsflash for you: I used to same address that you forged,
and that's why they issue you a TOS warning.

> His rudimentary computer skills can't possibly
> fool them. Hell, they don't fool ANYONE.

And we all know all about your 31I+3 skills: http://tinyurl.com/ifrt

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.30)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

2) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

3) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

4) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

5) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

6) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

7) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

8) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

9) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

10) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?

11) How exactly do you "enforce" an "order" to stay out of your mailbox,
supposedly (http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)? Since you issue this "order" about
every week, or so, apparently nobody wants to follow it. What are you going
to do about it?

12) What's with your fascination with shit? (also http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?

13) You complain about some arch-nemesis of yours always posting forged
messages in your name. Can you come up with even a single URL, as an example
of what you're talking about?

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-17291-1117289655-0001
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCmHy3x9p3GYHlUOIRAtXJAJ4na4bbjgwF3DDY8qrK2DoaV9brfQCf T1gZ
1HyHm8VmmQZ9TdsVZaf3E+o=
=Bfd8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-17291-1117289655-0001--

Re: "Sam"

am 28.05.2005 21:16:11 von Alan Connor

On comp.mail.misc, in , "Alan Connor" wrote:
>
>
> Note: I don't read the posts of "Sam", regardless of
> which of his/her hundreds of aliases he/she is using
> at the moment. My newsfilter even eradicates the
> Subject lines of his/her posts. This has been the
> case for years, although the poor lost soul never
> seems to accept this reality.
>
> He/she often forges my name, so be sure to check
> the headers of any posts that have my name.
> I only post with Earthlink, and they wouldn't
> give him an account for any amount of money:
> He has a record with them of filing false
> complaints against myself and others.
>
> For example: He forges my name all the time,
> but when I forged his ONCE, he complained
> to Earthlink. So I just sent them a digest
> of all the posts of his where he forged my
> name and he has been on their shit list
> every since then: He HAD to use his real
> return address to get them to even take
> his complaint seriously. Ha! Ha! Ha!
>
> His rudimentary computer skills can't possibly
> fool them. Hell, they don't fool ANYONE.
>
> AC
>
>
> --
> Please visit my home page:
> http://angel.1jh.com./nanae/kooks/alanconnor.html
>

I see that "Sam" actually replied to this, and posted
some other stuff too.

So what? All _I_ see is [Sam ] XXXXXXX.

Go for it "Sam". Knock yourself out. I couldn't
care less what you post.

I post what I want, when I want, and where I want,
and you can't do anything about it except make
an ass out of yourself, and you can't make me
read your posts.

That's called "total defeat".

If you don't like it, "Sam", try eating shit.

You have no other alternative.

One would think that after all these years you'd
realize that and get a better life.

So get one. Or die.

It's all the same to me.

You are just a fly buzzing around in the next room
from my perspective.

And you have no way of getting into this room.

-------------

"Sam" seems to actually believe that I read his/her
posts, which I haven't done in years.

That's REALLY pathetic.

AC

--
alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
Use your real return address or I'll never know you
even tried to mail me. http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp
~

Re: Beavis by the numbers, part II.

am 29.05.2005 00:15:47 von Sam

Re: "Sam"

am 30.05.2005 18:50:10 von Hans-Peter Sauer

Alan Connor wrote:
> Note: I don't read the posts of "Sam",
> His rudimentary computer skills can't possibly
> fool them. Hell, they don't fool ANYONE.
>
> AC
>
>

Alan Connor is a known troll and psychotic half wit.The unfortunate
mentally defective result of his mother having an affair with bigfoot's
dumber brother.