http://www.4-spam.com provide a spam filtering mailserver and recommend
using this in conjunction with a client side spam filter from a third
party, there are some reviews of third party filters.
The server side filter is not too tenacious so that there are rarely
any false positives.
The servers also filter out known virus attachments and unsafe macros.
We find this combination to be very effective.
On comp.mail.misc, in
<1118414160.731238.101590@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "mohc"
wrote:
>
> recommend using this in conjunction with a client side spam
> filter from a third party, there are some reviews of third
> party filters.
>
> The server side filter is not too tenacious so that there are
> rarely any false positives.
>
> The servers also filter out known virus attachments and unsafe
> macros.
>
> We find this combination to be very effective.
>
Who is "we"?
Advice from cowards who will not identify themselves is about
as valuable as a stinking dog turd on the sidewalk.
AC
--
alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
Use your real return address or I'll never know you
even tried to mail me. http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp
~
>Who is "we"?
>
>Advice from cowards who will not identify themselves is about
>as valuable as a stinking dog turd on the sidewalk.
If you enter www. plus the original posters e-mail address domain name
into your browser you get the answer on who "we" is....
Markus
On comp.mail.misc, in
Zingg" wrote:
>>Who is "we"?
>>
>>Advice from cowards who will not identify themselves
>>is about as valuable as a stinking dog turd on the
>>sidewalk.
>
> If you enter www. plus the original posters e-mail
> address domain name into your browser you get the
> answer on who "we" is....
Or who he wants you to _think_ "we" is.
Unless you have sent him a mail and received a reply
affirming that the owner of that address is indeed
the same person who posted here.
You are doing well on the Usenet for someone who was
born yesterday.
:-)
AC
--
alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
Use your real return address or I'll never know you
even tried to mail me. http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp
~
On 2005-06-10, I Spam
> http://www.we-spam.invalid provide a spam filtering mailserver and recommend
> using this in conjunction with a client side spam filter from a third
> party, there are some reviews of third party filters.
They spam a newsgroup about an anti-spam mailserver.
I guess it's true.
Pete.
On comp.mail.misc, in <1118414160.731238.101590@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "mohc" wrote:
"Pete"
I don't read the articles of people who use common first
names for aliases. Nor any replies to them.
AC
--
alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
Use your real return address or I'll never know you
even tried to mail me. http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp
~
Pete
> On 2005-06-10, I Spam
> > http://www.we-spam.invalid provide a spam filtering mailserver and recommend
> > using this in conjunction with a client side spam filter from a third
> > party, there are some reviews of third party filters.
>
> They spam a newsgroup about an anti-spam mailserver.
>
> I guess it's true.
If you mean a, possibly/probably unwanted/inappropriate/
*commercial posting*, then just say so. But unless the BI is over the
limit, it isn't "spam". After all, in this group we (tinw) are supposed
to use correct and unambiguous terminology, not yell "spam" at anything
we don't like.
>You are doing well on the Usenet for someone who was
>born yesterday.
english is not my native language
??? What are you trying to say with above statement? I'm posting to
usenet for quite a while....
Markus
On comp.mail.misc, in
<6boja1p3hnshjdgq87ou07rapbm6cg0lgl@4ax.com>, "Markus
Zingg" wrote:
>>You are doing well on the Usenet for someone who was
>>born yesterday.
>
>
>
Oh.
>
> ??? What are you trying to say with above
> statement? I'm posting to usenet for quite a
> while....
>
> Markus
That was a joke.
"Were you born yesterday?" means "Are you
incredibly naive?"
It is a colloquialism.
AC
--
alanconnor AT earthlink DOT net
Use your real return address or I'll never know you
even tried to mail me. http://tinyurl.com/2t5kp
~
This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.
--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-4196-1118439133-0005
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Markus Zingg writes:
>>You are doing well on the Usenet for someone who was
>>born yesterday.
>
>
> english is not my native language
>
>
> ??? What are you trying to say with above statement? I'm posting to
> usenet for quite a while....
The answer to your question can be found at:
http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml
--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-4196-1118439133-0005
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCqgbex9p3GYHlUOIRAnTBAJwK5hgBpaMEKLlyfoSTPqlnxoI0cgCe Nksf
lJ3f1VMjs7t+NiRfbLH+Qq8=
=JC2L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-4196-1118439133-0005--
Alan Connor wrote:
> On comp.mail.misc, in <1118414160.731238.101590@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "mohc" wrote:
>
>
>
> "Pete"
>
> I don't read the articles of people who use common first
> names for aliases. Nor any replies to them.
>
> AC
>
>
So you admit that you get bigfoot to ghost write your posts Mr 'Ever so
commonly named' Alan Connor.Thank you. Now be a good little psychoretard
and carry on eating your own shit.