[procmailrc] Problem with a filter never matched

am 22.11.2005 14:30:10 von Ludovic Martin

Hello

I would like to forward mail coming from gd.titus@tutu.fr to lulu@toto.fr

I make this .procmailrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 lmartin astre 933 Nov 22 13:56 .procmailrc

VERBOSE=yes
LOGFILE=./procmail.log
:0
* ^From.*titus.*
! lulu@toto.fr

But this rule is never applied, as shown in this log:

"rocmail: Skipped "
"rocmail: Skipped "
"rocmail: No match on "^From.*titus.*
"rocmail: Skipped "
"rocmail: Skipped "
"rocmail: Skipped "
procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/lmartin.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/lmartin"
procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/lmartin"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/lmartin.lock"
From gd.titus@tutu.fr Tue Nov 22 13:57:10 2005
Subject: test3
Folder: /var/spool/mail/lmartin 1848
procmail: Notified comsat: lmartin@0:/var/spool/mail/lmartin

Do you have any solution?

Thanks

Re: [procmailrc] Problem with a filter never matched (solved)

am 22.11.2005 18:32:56 von Ludovic Martin

My pbm was due to the presence of control-M's (carriage returns) in the rc
file.

> Hello
>
> I would like to forward mail coming from gd.titus@tutu.fr to lulu@toto.fr
>
> I make this .procmailrc
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lmartin astre 933 Nov 22 13:56 .procmailrc
>
> VERBOSE=yes
> LOGFILE=./procmail.log
> :0
> * ^From.*titus.*
> ! lulu@toto.fr
>
> But this rule is never applied, as shown in this log:
>
> "rocmail: Skipped "
> "rocmail: Skipped "
> "rocmail: No match on "^From.*titus.*
> "rocmail: Skipped "
> "rocmail: Skipped "
> "rocmail: Skipped "
> procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/lmartin.lock"
> procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/lmartin"
> procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/lmartin"
> procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
> procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/lmartin.lock"
> From gd.titus@tutu.fr Tue Nov 22 13:57:10 2005
> Subject: test3
> Folder: /var/spool/mail/lmartin 1848
> procmail: Notified comsat: lmartin@0:/var/spool/mail/lmartin
>
> Do you have any solution?
>
> Thanks
>

Re: [procmailrc] Problem with a filter never matched (solved)

am 23.11.2005 06:48:02 von Alan Connor

On comp.mail.misc, in <4383564a$0$24433$636a15ce@news.free.fr>,
"Ludovic Martin" wrote:

> My pbm was due to the presence of control-M's (carriage
> returns) in the rc file.

Thanks for posting the solution for the Archives, Ludovic. I
didn't have a clue. The CRs didn't make it onto the Usenet.

[Note: I don't read the posts of "Sam" nor any of his many
aliases, nor those of his dimwit 'friends', nor any responses to
them.]

Alan

--
URLs of possible interest in my headers.
~
~

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50) (was Re: [procmailrc] Probl

am 23.11.2005 12:22:52 von Sam

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.
The Internet standard for MIME PGP messages, RFC 2015, was published in 1996.
To open this message correctly you will need to install E-mail or Usenet
software that supports modern Internet standards.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21446-1132744977-0002
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Usenet Beavis writes:

> Thanks for posting the solution for the Archives, Ludovic. I
> didn't have a clue.

You can say that again.

> The CRs didn't make it onto the Usenet.

And the children rejoiced.

> [Note: it's not my fault that I'm a complete dumbass. I was dropped on my
> head as a child. See http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/alanconnor for
> more information]

And you can say that again, too. I'm proud to announce a new revision of
the Beavis FAQ, complete with a brand new addition. Which landed the
coveted #1 spot, BTW.

============================================================ ===============

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://angel.1jh.com/nanae/kooks/alanconnor.shtml

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If your Challenge-Response spam filter works so well, why are you munging
your address, when posting to Usenet?

2) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

3) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

4) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

5) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

6) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

7) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

8) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

9) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

10) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

11) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?

12) How exactly do you "enforce" an "order" to stay out of your mailbox,
supposedly (http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)? Since you issue this "order" about
every week, or so, apparently nobody wants to follow it. What are you going
to do about it?

13) What's with your fascination with shit? (also http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?

14) You complain about some arch-nemesis of yours always posting forged
messages in your name. Can you come up with even a single URL, as an example
of what you're talking about?

15) You always complain about some mythical spammers that pretend to be
spamfighters (http://tinyurl.com/br4td). Who exactly are those people, and
can you post a copy of a spam that you supposedly received from them, that
proves that they're really spammers, and not spamfighters?

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21446-1132744977-0002
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDhFERx9p3GYHlUOIRAuZeAJ0ToFyaMnXlYinvAx7l4Ioy739asgCe NZVt
PmGWEjkXONqH4RYLYXI274w=
=8T+h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-21446-1132744977-0002--

Re: FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50) (was Re: [procmailrc]

am 23.11.2005 16:11:00 von Andre Kostur

Sam wrote in
news:cone.1132744977.600435.21446.500@commodore.email-scan.c om:

> Usenet Beavis writes:
>

[snip pointless stuff]

>> The CRs didn't make it onto the Usenet.
>
> And the children rejoiced.

And that would be Carriage-Returns, not Challenge-Responses. Try reading
before posting.

>> [Note: it's not my fault that I'm a complete dumbass. I was dropped
>> on my head as a child. See
>> http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/alanconnor for more
>> information]

And this is simply dishonest. That quote appears nowhere in this thread,
other than where _you_ typed it.

[snip more completely irrelevant drivel]

Re: FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50) (was Re: [procmailrc] P

am 24.11.2005 00:27:06 von Sam