Bigfoot update

am 15.03.2006 01:58:52 von Sam

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.
The Internet standard for MIME PGP messages, RFC 2015, was published in 1996.
To open this message correctly you will need to install E-mail or Usenet
software that supports modern Internet standards.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-20585-1142384331-0003
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mimegpg

http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/060308/w030802.html

> KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) - Apparently, nobody wants to meet Bigfoot.
>=20
> The Malaysian Forestry Department says there are no takers for permits =
on=20
> offer to explore a protected forest for the mythical creature, despite=20
> initial excitement over reported sightings of the beast, The Star=20
> newspaper reported Wednesday.
>=20
> [ â=A6 ]
>=20
> The Malaysian media has been gripped by Bigfoot fever since November 20=
05,=20
> when fish farm workers reported seeing three giant human-like creatures =
in=20
> the Endau Rompin park in Johor. They also claimed to have seen a gigant=
ic=20
> footprint.

No word on whether Bigfoot has Internet access, in this nation whose=20
Internet usage has grown exponentially, in the last couple of years.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-20585-1142384331-0003
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEF2bLx9p3GYHlUOIRAlSbAJ49oTkdqFJ/IdksUPpYlb1lhJe3AwCf bace
Dy3eU1atm5Zt9CEMptxL17E=
=vhsc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-20585-1142384331-0003--

Re: Bigfoot update

am 15.03.2006 03:36:37 von Alan Connor

On comp.mail.misc, in , "Sam" wrote:

So "Sam" is seeing "Bigfoot" now.

Funny. I didn't know they lived in cities. (And "Sam" sure as
hell doesn't spend any time in the woods. He doesn't have any
time left after posting 150 schitt articles under 50 aliases
on dozens of newsgroups every single day.)

I guess sitting alone in his pigsty of a room while his mommy
whines at him and spending his days posting schitt on the Usnet
that no one but idiot trolls even read is getting to him.

He is probably having sexual fantasies about hairy babes that are
10 feet tall.

(Or is "Sam" a girl? No way to tell. Obnoxiousness and ignorance
are not limited to the male sex.)

If you are wondering why "Sam" uses multi-part MIME when everyone
else is using plain text, and throws in a PGP signature (anyone
can create a public key pair under any name), it's because he
thinks he is fooling everyone into believing that this is his
only alias because these articles look superficially different
from those of his other sockpupets.

Yes. He _is_ that ignorant. That's what happens when you run your
mouth all day long and don't even really read the articles
you are replying to.

[Note: I don't read the articles of "Sam" or his numerous
sockpuppets or his 'friends', nor any responses to them, and
haven't for years. He follows me all over the Usenet, and I
still don't read his articles. This _really_ pisses him off.
.]

Alan

--
http://home.earthlink.net/~alanconnor/contact.html
Other URLs of possible interest in my headers.

Re: Bigfoot update

am 15.03.2006 12:59:15 von Sam

It never fails. One mention of Bigfoot, and Beavis shows up here within =
24=20
hours.

> So "Sam" is seeing "Bigfoot" now.

Don't be jealous, Beavis.

> Funny. I didn't know they lived in cities. (And "Sam" sure as
> hell doesn't spend any time in the woods. He doesn't have any
> time left after posting 150 schitt articles under 50 aliases
> on dozens of newsgroups every single day.)

I'm also hiding under your bed, Beavis. Don't look.

> I guess sitting alone in his pigsty of a room while his mommy
> whines at him and spending his days posting schitt on the Usnet
> that no one but idiot trolls even read is getting to him.

Your colorful description of such a hypothetical situation strongly sugge=
sts=20
some familiarity with the subject.

> He is probably having sexual fantasies about hairy babes that are
> 10 feet tall.

How could such bizarre notions possibly enter your head, Beavis? You hav=
e=20
quite an imagination.

>
>=20
> (Or is "Sam" a girl? No way to tell. Obnoxiousness and ignorance
> are not limited to the male sex.)

People's Exhibit A: http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/

> If you are wondering why "Sam" uses multi-part MIME when everyone
> else is using plain text, and throws in a PGP signature (anyone
> can create a public key pair under any name), it's because he

â=A6 knows more about these things that Beavis could ever hope to le=
arn in his=20
lifetime.

> Yes. He _is_ that smart.

And I have the papers to prove it.

> [Note: it's not my fault that I'm a complete dumbass. I was dropped on =
my=20
> head as a child. See http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/ for=20
> more information]
>
> Beavis

I feel like an encore of "The Beavis Troll".

With apologies to Billy Joel.

It's nine o'clock on a Friday night,
and Beavis has nothing to do,
So here he comes, logging in,
He's gonna start flinging his poo.
He says -- Challenge-Response is the greatest thing
Since inventing machine to slice bread.
So what if it doesn't really work at all?
Everyone knows: I'm brain dead.

La la la, de de da
La la, de de da da da

Post some more crap, you're the Beavis troll,
Post some more crap while you drool,
Everyone knows that you won't read this post,
Your FAQ says why - you're a fool.

Now Beavis is screaming his fool head's off,
Because noone believes what he says.
Even Bigfoot knows that he's full of it,
He's mostly just flatulent gas.
We say: Beavis has nothing, no sense at all,
But his kookfarts are funny as hell.
They always manage to make us laugh,
And how did he get such a smell?

Oh, la la la, de de da
La la, de de da da da

Post some more crap, you're the Beavis troll,
Post some more crap while you drool,
Everyone knows that you won't read this post,
Your FAQ says why - you're a fool.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-28186-1142423954-0001
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEGAGSx9p3GYHlUOIRAmK9AJ9Ee59CmXpiBjA8D+ceFy70rCM+0wCf SWRm
kk9AeugShogPNsKV7lVBpuI=
=B1pX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-28186-1142423954-0001--

Re: Bigfoot update

am 16.03.2006 00:40:34 von Steve Baker

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:36:37 GMT, Alan Connor
wrote:

>Yes. He _is_ that ignorant. That's what happens when you run your
>mouth all day long and don't even really read the articles
>you are replying to.
>
>[Note: I don't read the articles of "Sam"

Good one, Beavis!

Steve Baker

Re: Bigfoot update

am 16.03.2006 05:04:38 von Alan Connor

On comp.mail.misc, in <2c9h129g2g0vnppdd3tu1pmeet6h4749vf@4ax.com>, "Steve Baker" wrote:

"Steve Baker" AKA "Sam".

[Note: I don't read the articles of "Sam" or his numerous
sockpuppets or his 'friends', nor any responses to them, and
haven't for years. He follows me all over the Usenet, and I
still don't read his articles. This _really_ pisses him off.
.]

Alan

--
http://home.earthlink.net/~alanconnor/contact.html
Other URLs of possible interest in my headers.

Re: Bigfoot update

am 16.03.2006 12:53:25 von Sam

>
> "Steve Baker" AKA "Sam".

Usenet Beavis, a.k.a. Bigfoot.

> [Note: it's not my fault that I'm a complete dumbass. I was dropped on my
> head as a child. See http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/ for
> more information]
>
> Beavis

FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If your Challenge-Response spam filter works so well, why are you munging
your address, when posting to Usenet?

2) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

3) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

4) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

5) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

6) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

7) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

8) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

9) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

10) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

11) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?

12) How exactly do you "enforce" an "order" to stay out of your mailbox,
supposedly (http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)? Since you issue this "order" about
every week, or so, apparently nobody wants to follow it. What are you going
to do about it?

13) What's with your fascination with shit? (also http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?

14) You complain about some arch-nemesis of yours always posting forged
messages in your name. Can you come up with even a single URL, as an example
of what you're talking about?

15) You always complain about some mythical spammers that pretend to be
spamfighters (http://tinyurl.com/br4td). Who exactly are those people, and
can you post a copy of a spam that you supposedly received from them, that
proves that they're really spammers, and not spamfighters?

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-15004-1142510004-0001
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEGVG0x9p3GYHlUOIRAkgdAJ92BjpEVT2Top4YeAmsjedB89g/pgCe JeJe
bEG18KIIIOWvyOolWjcJZSM=
=+usS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-15004-1142510004-0001--