Yahoo spam folder

Yahoo spam folder

am 17.04.2006 21:28:35 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: Yahoo spam folder

am 17.04.2006 22:53:13 von Alan Connor

On comp.mail.misc, in <2eq7429eram5qgmj8evg68v6pb9a3qtl6d@4ax.com>, "Gwen Morse" wrote:
> Path: newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink .net!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!hw mnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.phx! fe09.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> From: Gwen Morse
> Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
> Subject: Yahoo spam folder
> Message-ID: <2eq7429eram5qgmj8evg68v6pb9a3qtl6d@4ax.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846

> X-No-Archive: yes

He's hiding his posting history.

I'm sure there is a very good reason for that.

Like he doesn't want people that he's asking for help
to know that he's the same jerk who spammed the Usenet
last week or pollutes a hundred groups with racist
garbage on a regular basis.

Etc.

Nice people don't hide their posting histories.

Since he's here, and concerned with spam, he's
probably a spammer. Or wants to be one.

If you want to know how to keep people like this out
of your mailboxes, see:

http://home.earthlink.net/~alanconnor/elrav1/cr.html

> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 19
> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:28:35 -0400
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.45.255.107
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@cv.net
> X-Trace: fe09.lga 1145302115 24.45.255.107 (Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:28:35 MST)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:28:35 MST
> Organization: Optimum Online
> Xref: news.earthlink.net comp.mail.misc:77065
> X-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:28:38 PDT (newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)




[Note: I don't read the articles of "Sam" or his numerous
sockpuppets or his 'friends', nor any responses to them, and
haven't for years. He follows me all over the Usenet, and I
still don't read his articles. This _really_ pisses him off.
.]

Alan

--
http://home.earthlink.net/~alanconnor/contact.html
Other URLs of possible interest in my headers.

Re: Yahoo spam folder

am 18.04.2006 00:14:50 von Sam

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message. If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.
The Internet standard for MIME PGP messages, RFC 2015, was published in 1996.
To open this message correctly you will need to install E-mail or Usenet
software that supports modern Internet standards.

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-23992-1145312084-0004
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Usenet Beavis writes:

> He's hiding his posting history.

And you were dropped on your head, as a child.

> I'm sure there is a very good reason for that.

Yes -- your obsessive-compulsive paranoia.

> Like he doesn't want people that he's asking for help
> to know that he's the same jerk who spammed the Usenet
> last week or pollutes a hundred groups with racist
> garbage on a regular basis.

He's also hiding under your bed, Beavis.

> If you want to know how to keep people like this out
> of your mailboxes, see:
>
> http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/

Will do. Thanks for the tip!

> [Note: it's not my fault that I'm a complete dumbass. I was dropped on my
> head as a child. See http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/ for
> more information]
>
> Beavis


FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50)

This is a canonical list of questions that Beavis never answers. This FAQ is
posted on a semi-regular schedule, as circumstances warrant.

For more information on Beavis, see:

http://www.pearlgates.net/nanae/kooks/ac/

Although Beavis has been posting for a long time, he always remains silent
on the subjects enumerated below. His response, if any, usually consists of
replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading
software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's
making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. For more information
see question #9 below.

============================================================ ================

1) If your Challenge-Response spam filter works so well, why are you munging
your address, when posting to Usenet?

2) If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do
all these bounces everyone reports getting (for spam with their return
address was forged onto) come from?

3) If your Challenge-Response filter is so great, why do you still munge
when posting to Usenet?

4) Do you still believe that rsh is the best solution for remote access?
(http://tinyurl.com/5qqb6)

5) What is your evidence that everyone who disagrees with you, and thinks
that you're a moron, is a spammer?

6) How many different individuals do you believe really post to
comp.mail.misc? What is the evidence for your paranoid belief that everyone,
except you, who posts here is some unknown arch-nemesis of yours?

7) How many times, or how often, do you believe is necessary to announce
that you do not read someone's posts? What is your reason for making these
regularly-scheduled proclamations? Who do you believe is so interested in
keeping track of your Usenet-reading habits?

8) When was the last time you saw Bigfoot (http://tinyurl.com/23r3f)?

9) If your C-R system employs a spam filter so that it won't challenge spam,
then why does any of the mail that passes the filter, and is thusly presumed
not to be spam, need to be challenged?

10) You claim that the software you use to read Usenet magically identifies
any post that makes fun of you. In http://tinyurl.com/3swes you explain
that "What I get in my newsreader is a mock post with fake headers and no
body, except for the first parts of the Subject and From headers."

Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows,
the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn
available for download anywhere?

11) You regularly post alleged logs of your procmail recipe autodeleting a
bunch of irrelevant mail that you've received. Why, and who exactly do you
believe is interested in your mail logs?

12) How exactly do you "enforce" an "order" to stay out of your mailbox,
supposedly (http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)? Since you issue this "order" about
every week, or so, apparently nobody wants to follow it. What are you going
to do about it?

13) What's with your fascination with shit? (also http://tinyurl.com/cs8jt)?

14) You complain about some arch-nemesis of yours always posting forged
messages in your name. Can you come up with even a single URL, as an example
of what you're talking about?

15) You always complain about some mythical spammers that pretend to be
spamfighters (http://tinyurl.com/br4td). Who exactly are those people, and
can you post a copy of a spam that you supposedly received from them, that
proves that they're really spammers, and not spamfighters?


--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-23992-1145312084-0004
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBERBNUx9p3GYHlUOIRAiLSAJ0TAbsvut3bNNJCf4PQAmTBBUvZbwCe Ke6a
ozVyDI3iGPzn7k9gNu/zwKQ=
=N9R9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-commodore.email-scan.com-23992-1145312084-0004--

Re: Yahoo spam folder

am 18.04.2006 00:50:23 von Chris L

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:28:35 -0400, Gwen Morse
wrote:

>I pay for POP3 service from yahoo, and I also use the spam filtering.
>
>When I log into the site, I can delete the contents of the folder and
>then download my (almost) spam-free Inbox. When I use a client to
>download the mail, it also gathers the mail from my spam folder (which
>I don't really want).
>
>There is a spam header added, which I can use to filter messages to
>the trash. But, is there any way to send a "just delete the spam mail
>before downloading" message?

Log in to your Yahoo Web mail, go to Options > POP Access and
Forwarding, and select "I don't want to receive any messages that
SpamGuard thinks are spam"

Re: Yahoo spam folder

am 18.04.2006 22:11:18 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)