Re: snapshot/switch version number

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludek Finstrle [mailto:luf@pzkagis.cz]=20
> Sent: 21 April 2006 15:00
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] snapshot/switch version number
>=20
> Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:30:56PM +0100, Dave Page napsal(a):
> > > > I am trying to create a front-end to an existing postgres
> > > database in
> > > > MS Access 2002 using 8.01.20 Unicode ODBC driver. Some of
> > > the simpler
> > > > queries
> > >=20
> > > Please could you try 07.03.026X version? You can download it from=20
> > > pgfoundry.org. This version is much powerfull and stable=20
> (as I can=20
> > > see).
> >=20
> > I should probably build a new snapshot based on CVS tip sometime in=20
> > the next week or so. Anyone object?
>=20
> I agree.
>=20
> I vote for renumbering experimental branch to stable one (to=20
> 08.01.1001 or maybe 08.01.1000). 08.01.0XXX has no additional=20
> support (my opinion is it's waste of time).

It's already at 08.02.0001 (see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2006-04/msg00028.p hp)

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: snapshot/switch version number

> > I vote for renumbering experimental branch to stable one (to
> > 08.01.1001 or maybe 08.01.1000). 08.01.0XXX has no additional
> > support (my opinion is it's waste of time).
>
> It's already at 08.02.0001 (see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2006-04/msg00028.p hp)

Does we plan to release 08.02.0100 in quite short time (eg. in few weeks)?
I think it is confusing for users that we recommend enhanced experimental
branch due to better stability, more features etc.

Regards,

Luf

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings