Re: U.S. to issue RFID passports in August despite all the warnings

tedrichardson9925@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>
> The U.S. will begin issuing passports with RFID chips in August.
> Security experts fear these can be read from afar by criminals and the
> like. Here is information on why this technology "touted" as security
> might not be a good idea:

Once again, Teddy, it's *your* opinion.

Do you *not* know the difference between fact and opinion?

Notan

Re: U.S. to issue RFID passports in August despite all the warnings

Notan wrote:
> tedrichardson9925@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>> The U.S. will begin issuing passports with RFID chips in August.
>> Security experts fear these can be read from afar by criminals and the
>> like. Here is information on why this technology "touted" as security
>> might not be a good idea:
>
> Once again, Teddy, it's *your* opinion.
>
> Do you *not* know the difference between fact and opinion?

I guess his opinion accurately represents the facts.

Re: U.S. to issue RFID passports in August despite all the warnings

Sebastian Gottschalk writes:

>Notan wrote:
>> tedrichardson9925@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>> The U.S. will begin issuing passports with RFID chips in August.
>>> Security experts fear these can be read from afar by criminals and the
>>> like. Here is information on why this technology "touted" as security
>>> might not be a good idea:
>>
>> Once again, Teddy, it's *your* opinion.
>>
>> Do you *not* know the difference between fact and opinion?

It sounds like the first two sentences are fact. The last is opinion. Seems
clear to me, unless Notan claims either that the US passports will not user
RFID chips, or that no Security experts fear reading from afar.

>I guess his opinion accurately represents the facts.