IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

We would like to introduce ourselves as a dedicated IT Security & Audit
Training Institute offering myriad of courses and programs to suit
requirements of varied groups ranging from management to network
administrators to system administrators, end-users etc. Programs
offered: IT Security Awareness Programs, CISSP Exam Preparation
Program, CISA Preparation Program, COMPTIA Security+, Checkpoint CCSA,
Developing Information Security Policies, Penetration Testing (aka
Ethical Hacking), Computer Forensics, Incident Handling, BCP & DRP,
Cyberlaw, Auditor's Guide to IT Security.

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

Leythos writes:

> In article <1154343191.027033.205180@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
> sameer@sai-india.com says...
> > We would like to introduce ourselves as a dedicated IT Security & Audit
> > Training Institute offering myriad of courses and programs to suit
> > requirements of varied groups ranging from management to network
> > administrators to system administrators, end-users etc. Programs
> > offered: IT Security Awareness Programs, CISSP Exam Preparation
> > Program, CISA Preparation Program, COMPTIA Security+, Checkpoint CCSA,
> > Developing Information Security Policies, Penetration Testing (aka
> > Ethical Hacking), Computer Forensics, Incident Handling, BCP & DRP,
> > Cyberlaw, Auditor's Guide to IT Security.
>
> Spamming this group with your AD will not get you any customers.
>
> Only a fool would spam a non Biz group and expect to get anything other
> than grief from it.

I personally liked the part where they fail to mention the name of the
company.

--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

SAM_ITSEC wrote:
> We would like to introduce ourselves

Please stop spamming this group. This will not lead to orders for you,
but to a very bad disreputability for your company.

Thank you.

Yours,
VB.
--
Ich würde schätzen, dass ca. 87% aller spontanen Schätzungen völlig für
den Arsch sind.

Ralph Angenendt in debate@ccc.de

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:53:11 -0700, SAM_ITSEC spammed:

> We would like to introduce ourselves as a dedicated IT Security & Audit
>

Must be a very reputable outfit since they post from google rather than
their own system. ;)

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

Renegade wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:53:11 -0700, SAM_ITSEC spammed:
>
> > We would like to introduce ourselves as a dedicated IT Security & Audit
>
> Must be a very reputable outfit since they post from google rather than
> their own system. ;)

Well, many, and probably most, companies don't run/have "their own
system" (i.e. News server). And many, and probably most, companies block
most ports, including NNTP/119.

So while it's probably more professional to use another web-to-News
provider, I can understand if people take the easy path, i.e. Google
Groups.

As others have pointed out, there are enough *other* reasons to blame
the OP, so no need to knock/mock the tool they used for posting it! :-)

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:42:14 +0000, Frank Slootweg wrote:

> Renegade wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:53:11 -0700, SAM_ITSEC spammed:
>>
>> > We would like to introduce ourselves as a dedicated IT Security &
>> > Audit
>>
>> Must be a very reputable outfit since they post from google rather than
>> their own system. ;)
>
> Well, many, and probably most, companies don't run/have "their own
> system" (i.e. News server). And many, and probably most, companies block
> most ports, including NNTP/119.

Valid point there, but I would think that since they touted IT training
and security that they would not have to resort to using google. To me
that was just a big flashing neon sign that says "We have no clue". ;)

I may be judging them too harshly on that point, but it seems that the
majority of trolls seem to post from google also.

Re: IT_SECURITY_TRAINING

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)