RE: Internal Server Error

RE: Internal Server Error

am 12.03.2002 18:26:22 von Carlos Costa Portela

=09What kind of page are your trying to view?

On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Pelton, James wrote:

> For better or worse, my site has no CGIs or scripts!

=09Best regards,
Carlos.

http://www.tertulandia.com : sea cual sea tu tema... all=ED est=E1 tu sit=
io!

_______Carlos Costa Portela_______________________________________________=
__
| e-mail: ccosta@servidores.net | home page: http://casa.ccp.servidores.ne=
t |
|_____T=F3dalas persoas maiores foron nenos antes, pero poucas se lembran__=
____|


------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

Re:

am 11.11.2009 00:24:46 von Stephen Love

----__JWM__J142f.4b48S.0147M
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

Don't want identification. I want point to point response capability, ev=
en if it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back to that e=
xact address and know it went to that particular computer instead of ran=
domly going all over the world. Sounds like either I have been misinform=
ed about how packets are sent, or a LOT of programmers simply do not kno=
w the truth! 2-way handshaking requires session identification ALL the w=
ay back to its source.


See us online at http://www.LOVEnCompany.com.

---------- Original Message ----------
From: LuKreme
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd]
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:06:51 -0700

On 10-Nov-2009, at 13:49, Andr=E9 Warnier wrote:
> And I would add that, from a user point of view, I would be very reluc=
tant to help at any system that would let me be identified in any way ot=
her than me voluntarily and knowingly providing my id by means of some o=
bvious login page or certificate, and then only to some party I trust no=
t to disseminate that information outside of my control.
> And enough recent cases have shown that such trustable parties are not=
very thick on the ground.


Heck, I don't even trust MYSELF that much.

-- =

'They say that whoever pays the piper calls the tune.'
'But, gentlemen,' said Mr Saveloy, 'whoever holds a knife to the piper's=
throat writes the symphony.' --Interesting Times


------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Projec=
t.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
____________________________________________________________
Business Security Camera Quotes
Get free business security camera price quotes from multiple dealers!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/c?cp=3DoAsl4Bai_493 n9q9V-CLawAA=
Jz1cSR5zxtI8-KAHzBSY23cQAAQAAAAFAAAAAOOlGz0AAANSAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAABIVYgAA=
AAA=3D
----__JWM__J142f.4b48S.0147M
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252

Don't want identification. I want point to point response capab=
ility, even if it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back =
to that exact address and know it went to that particular computer inste=
ad of randomly going all over the world. Sounds like either I have been =
misinformed about how packets are sent, or a LOT of programmers simply d=
o not know the truth! 2-way handshaking requires session identification =
ALL the way back to its source.


See us online at http://www.L=
OVEnCompany.com.

---------- Original Message ----------
From: =
LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subje=
ct: Re: [users@httpd]
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:06:51 -0700

On=
10-Nov-2009, at 13:49, Andr=E9 Warnier wrote:
> And I would add t=
hat, from a user point of view, I would be very reluctant to help at any=
system that would let me be identified in any way other than me volunta=
rily and knowingly providing my id by means of some obvious login page o=
r certificate, and then only to some party I trust not to disseminate th=
at information outside of my control.
> And enough recent cases ha=
ve shown that such trustable parties are not very thick on the ground. R>

Heck, I don't even trust MYSELF that much.

--
'They=
say that whoever pays the piper calls the tune.'
'But, gentlemen,' s=
aid Mr Saveloy, 'whoever holds a knife to the piper's throat writes the =
symphony.' --Interesting Times


------------------------------=
---------------------------------------
The official User-To-User sup=
port forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://http=
d.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail=
: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
  "   from t=
he digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional c=
ommands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org





______________________=
______________________________________

93n9q9V-CLawAAJz1cSR5zxtI8-KAHzBSY23cQAAQAAAAFAAAAAOOlGz0AAA NSAAAAAAAAAA=
AAAAAAABIVYgAAAAA=3D target=3D"_blank">Business Security Camera Quotes r>Get free business security camera price quotes from multiple dealers!<=
/font>


----__JWM__J142f.4b48S.0147M--

Re:

am 11.11.2009 01:06:38 von Eric Covener

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Stephen Love wrote:
> Don't want identification. I want point to point response capability, even
> if it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back to that exact
> address and know it went to that particular computer instead of randomly
> going all over the world. Sounds like either I have been misinformed about
> how packets are sent, or a LOT of programmers simply do not know the truth!
> 2-way handshaking requires session identification ALL the way back to its
> source.

You get all this from TCP, you just can't make any statement about
how different TCP connections over time are related (as your OP
implied)

--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

Re:

am 11.11.2009 07:00:30 von Norman Peelman

Stephen Love wrote:
>
> Don't want identification. I want point to point response capability,
> even if it goes away later... a way to know that I can send back to
> that exact address and know it went to that particular computer
> instead of randomly going all over the world. Sounds like either I
> have been misinformed about how packets are sent, or a LOT of
> programmers simply do not know the truth! 2-way handshaking requires
> session identification ALL the way back to its source.
>
>
Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. The IP address is the only thing
you can go by and that can change on a request basis. The IP address is
the 'street address' you want but they are not all assigned permanently
at this time.



--
Norman Registered Linux user #461062

------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org