Primary Response SafeConnect Anyone use it?
am 07.02.2007 03:01:52 von RangerIf it has been used by anyone--what do you think of it? Is it worth
$30/yr, at least for the first year?
If it has been used by anyone--what do you think of it? Is it worth
$30/yr, at least for the first year?
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Traditional antivirus software often depends on the identity or
signatures of known viruses to block malicious code and generally
focuses only on file system scans and email attachments. While
signatures for new attacks can be developed in a minimal amount of
time by antivirus vendors, sometimes even a matter of hours, it
requires much more time to deploy the new signatures to individual end
users an all systems across an enterprise. As a result, antivirus
software is limited in its ability to defend against unknown or zero
day attacks, not to mention known, established attacks that execute
out of memory. This leaves systems vulnerable. Enterprises and end
users need more immediate and real-time protection against these types
of stealthy, ever-evolving threats.
It is increasingly evident that the conventional approach to tackling
malicious software through signatures and scanning falls short. Not
only is the user experience unappealing, the technology approach
itself is minimally effective against the speed and complexity with
which new attacks are launched.