generate xml without need to persist it in a file?

am 20.03.2007 16:26:10 von bajopalabra

hi
i get data with ado
i need to get a xml string from the recordset

how can i get it
without having to persist the recordset
in a (xml) text file

is there a simple way ?

thanks !!
ks

Re: generate xml without need to persist it in a file?

am 20.03.2007 16:35:57 von bajopalabra

that is,
without having to do
my own function for :
- getrows
- scan array
- format text
- merge
- end scan
- return xml

because
i think that could be more expensive
(in computational terms)

thanks
ks

"keyser soze" escribió en el mensaje
news:ekF3IKwaHHA.1240@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| hi
| i get data with ado
| i need to get a xml string from the recordset
|
| how can i get it
| without having to persist the recordset
| in a (xml) text file
|
| is there a simple way ?
|
| thanks !!
| ks
|
|
|

Re: generate xml without need to persist it in a file?

am 20.03.2007 16:42:06 von reb01501

Look at the code in the "Data Island" sample here:
http://www.davidpenton.com/testsite/tips/

keyser soze wrote:
> that is,
> without having to do
> my own function for :
> - getrows
> - scan array
> - format text
> - merge
> - end scan
> - return xml
>
> because
> i think that could be more expensive
> (in computational terms)
>
> thanks
> ks
>
>
>
> "keyser soze" escribió en el mensaje
> news:ekF3IKwaHHA.1240@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> hi
>> i get data with ado
>> i need to get a xml string from the recordset
>>
>> how can i get it
>> without having to persist the recordset
>> in a (xml) text file
>>
>> is there a simple way ?
>>
>> thanks !!
>> ks

--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.

Re: generate xml without need to persist it in a file?

am 20.03.2007 17:40:18 von bajopalabra

Re: generate xml without need to persist it in a file?

am 20.03.2007 18:45:45 von reb01501

keyser soze wrote:
> thanks bob,
>
> but i need to "response.write" a xml string

Huh? The example shows how to do it!
>
> it's strange that there is no method
> to get a string from the xmldom object
>

Again, huh!?!?

What about

response.write xmldoc.xml

??

> in fact,
> there is a method to construct the xmldom object
> from a string , with "loadXML"
>
> if i must persist xml strings
> one little problem is the xml file name
> but a major one, is to have a kind of garbage
> to delete files
>
> there is no other way ?
> am i wrong ?
>
> thanks ! ks
>
> "Bob Barrows [MVP]" escribió en el mensaje
> news:%23U8gBYwaHHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Look at the code in the "Data Island" sample here:
>> http://www.davidpenton.com/testsite/tips/
>>
>> keyser soze wrote:
>>> that is,
>>> without having to do
>>> my own function for :
>>> - getrows
>>> - scan array
>>> - format text
>>> - merge
>>> - end scan
>>> - return xml
>>>
>>> because
>>> i think that could be more expensive
>>> (in computational terms)
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> ks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "keyser soze" escribió en el mensaje
>>> news:ekF3IKwaHHA.1240@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> hi
>>>> i get data with ado
>>>> i need to get a xml string from the recordset
>>>>
>>>> how can i get it
>>>> without having to persist the recordset
>>>> in a (xml) text file
>>>>
>>>> is there a simple way ?
>>>>
>>>> thanks !!
>>>> ks
>>
>> --
>> Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
>> Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
>> header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get
>> a quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.

--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.

Re: generate xml without need to persist it in a file?

am 20.03.2007 18:59:33 von bajopalabra