Proposal for PTools::* bundle

Long time CPAN user, first time submitter. So, first things first.
I've got some tools to submit that rely on some lower level modules,
and I'll need to submit the meta-tools first. Things like an OO
interfaces to Getopt::Long, Date::Format and Date::Parse; a module to
turn a script into a daemon process; another to handle all the
counters in an application. Nothing quite like them around already.

Includes a couple of modules that implement a flexible, multi-tier
library heirarchy for larger applications that makes the development
and evolution of modules and apps a lot easier. These also allow for
completely relocatable Perl apps without modification to directory
paths.

Originally these were just in the top-level name space, so I've just
recently collected them under the PTools::* space. Any objections?
TIA,

Re: Proposal for PTools::* bundle

On Mar 21, 4:32 pm, "ccobb" wrote:
> Long time CPAN user, first time submitter. So, first things first.
> I've got some tools to submit that rely on some lower level modules,
> and I'll need to submit the meta-tools first. Things like an OO
> interfaces to Getopt::Long, Date::Format and Date::Parse; a module to
> turn a script into a daemon process; another to handle all the
> counters in an application. Nothing quite like them around already.
>
> Includes a couple of modules that implement a flexible, multi-tier
> library heirarchy for larger applications that makes the development
> and evolution of modules and apps a lot easier. These also allow for
> completely relocatable Perl apps without modification to directory
> paths.
>
> Originally these were just in the top-level name space, so I've just
> recently collected them under the PTools::* space. Any objections?
> TIA,

Cool, when? I am having resource issues w/ Proc::Daemon and
desperately need an alternative.

What's the "P" stand for, FMI?

Keith

Re: Proposal for PTools::* bundle

On Mar 23, 9:02 am, "Keith" wrote:
> On Mar 21, 4:32 pm, "ccobb" wrote:
>
> > ... a module to turn a script into a daemon process; ...
>
> Cool, when? I am having resource issues w/ Proc::Daemon and
> desperately need an alternative.
>
> What's the "P" stand for, FMI?
>

Cool, today! 'Tis mirroring as I type. Hope it helps.
http://search.cpan.org/search?query=PTools&mode=dist

P for Perl ;-) PerlTools for Perl Tool Developers.

What kind of daemon are you building?
Chris