Driver name *still* in flux?

hinoue@pgfoundry.org (User Hinoue) writes:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> . Use different dll name for Unicode and ANSI DTC enlist DLL
> so that they can be placed in the same folder.

I've been holding off updating Red Hat's distribution of psqlodbc
until the driver name stabilized, because I didn't want to break
peoples' configuration files (at least not repeatedly). I'm a bit
disappointed to see that apparently this is still not settled.

When will there be a release with a stable driver name?

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: Driver name *still* in flux?

Tom Lane wrote:
> hinoue@pgfoundry.org (User Hinoue) writes:
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> . Use different dll name for Unicode and ANSI DTC enlist DLL
>> so that they can be placed in the same folder.
>
> I've been holding off updating Red Hat's distribution of psqlodbc
> until the driver name stabilized, because I didn't want to break
> peoples' configuration files (at least not repeatedly). I'm a bit
> disappointed to see that apparently this is still not settled.

The DTC Enlist DLL is not the driver.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: Driver name *still* in flux?

Dave Page writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been holding off updating Red Hat's distribution of psqlodbc
>> until the driver name stabilized,

> The DTC Enlist DLL is not the driver.

Ah, thanks for setting me straight.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq