test message <eom>

this message was intentionally left blank.

Re: test message <eom>

mark Stanton wrote:
> this message was intentionally left blank.
>

Try alt.test next time.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: test message <eom>

In article <86bd4$4635fafb$40cba7a5$10895@NAXS.COM>, Jonathan N.
Little wrote:
> mark Stanton wrote:
> > this message was intentionally left blank.
> >
> Try alt.test next time.

How did this get here?

I *have* been trying to use alt.test, and complained to my ISP that I
couldn't post to usenet.
Looks like they've been trying it out for me! I *never* post from
that address.

Sorry about that.
Mark

Re: test message <eom>

Usenet wrote:
> In article <86bd4$4635fafb$40cba7a5$10895@NAXS.COM>, Jonathan N.
> Little wrote:
>> mark Stanton wrote:
>>> this message was intentionally left blank.
>>>
>> Try alt.test next time.
>
> How did this get here?
>
> I *have* been trying to use alt.test, and complained to my ISP that I
> couldn't post to usenet.
> Looks like they've been trying it out for me! I *never* post from
> that address.
>
> Sorry about that.

Looks like you may have numskulls at your ISP's tech dept!


--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

Re: test message <eom>

Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Usenet wrote:
>> In article <86bd4$4635fafb$40cba7a5$10895@NAXS.COM>, Jonathan N.
>> Little wrote:
>>> mark Stanton wrote:
>>>> this message was intentionally left blank.
>>>>
>>> Try alt.test next time.
>>
>> How did this get here?
>>
>> I *have* been trying to use alt.test, and complained to my ISP that I
>> couldn't post to usenet.
>> Looks like they've been trying it out for me! I *never* post from
>> that address.
>>
>> Sorry about that.
>
> Looks like you may have numskulls at your ISP's tech dept!

....who apparently just posted *with his email address in the clear*.

They have extra-numb skulls if that is the case.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

Re: test message <eom>

In article , Blinky the
Shark wrote:
> > Looks like you may have numskulls at your ISP's tech dept!
> ....who apparently just posted *with his email address in the clear*.
> They have extra-numb skulls if that is the case.

It is the case!
It's taken them nearly two weeks to fix this.
And they posted a test message to a non-test newsgroup.
With my address clearly visible.
And now they're claiming it was never broken in the first place...

It's a Pipex company.

No wonder the gene pool is in the state its in... 8-(

Mark

Re: test message <eom>

Usenet wrote:
> In article , Blinky the
> Shark wrote:
>> > Looks like you may have numskulls at your ISP's tech dept!
>> ....who apparently just posted *with his email address in the clear*.
>> They have extra-numb skulls if that is the case.
>
> It is the case!
> It's taken them nearly two weeks to fix this.
> And they posted a test message to a non-test newsgroup.
> With my address clearly visible.
> And now they're claiming it was never broken in the first place...
>
> It's a Pipex company.
>
> No wonder the gene pool is in the state its in... 8-(

Which state is that? I want to make sure I never move there. ;)

--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html