Heres the REAL reason a website doesn"t work...
am 20.06.2007 12:11:37 von TravisNewburyFor your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
http://www.1websitedesign.net/the-6-biggest-reasons-why-most -websites-fail.html
For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
http://www.1websitedesign.net/the-6-biggest-reasons-why-most -websites-fail.html
Travis Newbury wrote:
> For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
:) I always though the biggest reasons were you're not using enough
blink and marquee elements!
--
Dylan Parry
http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk
The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of
those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own.
On Jun 20, 8:35 pm, Dylan Parry
> Travis Newbury wrote:
> > For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
>
> :) I always though the biggest reasons were you're not using enough
> blink and marquee elements!
>
Nah, it's due to a lack of nude photos...... Well they did say you
needed something on your site to grad the visitors atention!.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz
"Travis Newbury"
news:1182334297.910223.36830@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
>
> http://www.1websitedesign.net/the-6-biggest-reasons-why-most -websites-fail.html
>
Their reasoning may be sound, but upon reading through the page, there
appear to be many grammatical errors which result in some sentences making
no sense at all. Content is as important as presentation, and if the page
seems to be written by an illiterate, it makes you question the quality of
the company and their work.
Mike
Dylan Parry wrote:
> Travis Newbury wrote:
>> For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
>
>:) I always though the biggest reasons were you're not using enough
> blink and marquee elements!
Blink. Now *there's* something to which I can relate.
--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
"Travis Newbury"
news:1182334297.910223.36830@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
>
> http://www.1websitedesign.net/the-6-biggest-reasons-why-most -websites-fail.html
>
hmmm... 59 validation errors... LMGDAO
asdf wrote:
>
> "Travis Newbury"
> news:1182334297.910223.36830@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> For your reading pleasure, then file appropriately...
>>
>> http://www.1websitedesign.net/the-6-biggest-reasons-why-most -websites-fail.html
>>
> hmmm... 59 validation errors... LMGDAO
After at least a minute, I got tired of waiting it to finish
downloading. I wanted to see how many the FireBug FF
extension...uh...add-on would show (it niftily shows an error count (or a
checkmark if none) on the FF status bar. But it wasn't worth the wait.
On the topic of FireBug, while I've used the WebDeveloper extension for
a long time, this one (FireBug) might be of interest to y'all (plural).
http://www.getfirebug.com/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843
--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> On the topic of FireBug, while I've used the WebDeveloper extension for
> a long time, this one (FireBug) might be of interest to y'all (plural).
>
> http://www.getfirebug.com/
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843
Do Firebug and WebDeveloper live together harmoniously? Or do they
conflict with each other when both are installed?
--
John
John Hosking wrote:
> Do Firebug and WebDeveloper live together harmoniously? Or do they
> conflict with each other when both are installed?
No conflicts in my installation.
--
Dylan Parry
http://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.uk
The opinions stated above are not necessarily representative of
those of my cats. All opinions expressed are entirely your own.
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:38:29 +0100, Dylan Parry wrote:
> John Hosking wrote:
>
>> Do Firebug and WebDeveloper live together harmoniously? Or do they
>> conflict with each other when both are installed?
>
> No conflicts in my installation.
....nor in mine.
mbstevens wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:38:29 +0100, Dylan Parry wrote:
>
>> John Hosking wrote:
>>
>>> Do Firebug and WebDeveloper live together harmoniously? Or do they
>>> conflict with each other when both are installed?
>> No conflicts in my installation.
>
> ...nor in mine.
Okayfinethanks! Times two.
--
John
John Hosking wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> On the topic of FireBug, while I've used the WebDeveloper extension for
>> a long time, this one (FireBug) might be of interest to y'all (plural).
>>
>> http://www.getfirebug.com/
>> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843
>
> Do Firebug and WebDeveloper live together harmoniously? Or do they
> conflict with each other when both are installed?
I've seen no problems. I keep Firebug running. I run WebDeveloper when
I want to.
--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
In article
Blinky the Shark
> John Hosking wrote:
> > Blinky the Shark wrote:
> > Do Firebug and WebDeveloper live together harmoniously? Or do they
> > conflict with each other when both are installed?
>
> I've seen no problems. I keep Firebug running. I run WebDeveloper when
> I want to.
And times 4
--
dorayme