Mix of xml and html

I wonder what this header does mean:




....

....

When such a file is saved as *.htm, it's displayed in an browser as
HTML. When saved as *.xml, it's displayed as XML. When streamed directly
into an browser, nothing is displayed at all. In the latter case, what's
missing so that the browser cannot determine how to handle the document?
(Maybe my streaming code doesn't work properly?)

The most puzzling element in such HTML Help documents is:
Text

"Text" is displayed, but what is the intended interpretation of the
surrounding decoration? It seems to be some XML element, that is ignored
by an ordinary browser.

What can or has to be done, in order to make such a construct have any
effect? Actually I edit the files, converting the "link" into "A" tags,
so that they work as HTML links. But that's a poor solution, couldn't
this be done in another (the intended) way?

DoDi

Re: Mix of xml and html

On Jun 24, 3:29 pm, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> I wonder what this header does mean:
>
>
>
>
> ...
>
> ...
>
> When such a file is saved as *.htm, it's displayed in an browser as
> HTML. When saved as *.xml, it's displayed as XML. When streamed directly
> into an browser, nothing is displayed at all. In the latter case, what's
> missing so that the browser cannot determine how to handle the document?
> (Maybe my streaming code doesn't work properly?)
>
> The most puzzling element in such HTML Help documents is:
> Text
>
> "Text" is displayed, but what is the intended interpretation of the
> surrounding decoration? It seems to be some XML element, that is ignored
> by an ordinary browser.
>
> What can or has to be done, in order to make such a construct have any
> effect? Actually I edit the files, converting the "link" into "A" tags,
> so that they work as HTML links. But that's a poor solution, couldn't
> this be done in another (the intended) way?

This is a typical case of Microsoftese and likely does not conform to
W3C standards and likely will not work properly on most modern
browsers that follow W3C standards. If you have to use this for some
reason, that is a pity. But I always avoid such silly Microsoft code
when I can find any other way to do what is needed using W3C web
standards. If someone here does not give the answer you need, you
might try asking at a Microsoft group.

Re: Mix of xml and html

On 24 Jun, 21:29, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> I wonder what this header does mean:
>
>
>

"MS"? In a HTML context?

It means, "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Render Here"

Re: Mix of xml and html

cwdjrxyz wrote:

> standards. If someone here does not give the answer you need, you
> might try asking at a Microsoft group.

There I'll get the answer: use dexplore.exe, it's designed for handling
such crap. Not very helpful :-(

But if nobody here can give me an hint, I'll stay with converting the
files into better conforming HTML...

DoDi

Re: Mix of xml and html

On 25 Jun, 14:07, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:

> But if nobody here can give me an hint,

Of course we can't - you posted 5 lines snipped from a long document,
rather than giving us a YURl to the whole thing.

> I'll stay with converting the files into better conforming HTML...

It's less about "better conforming HTML" and more about converting
from an XML format that isn't HTML and bears only a passing
resemblance to it. To do that you need knowledge of HTML and knowledge
of the other XML schema too. As it's from M$oft it's probably unstable
against change, poorly documented, badly thought out, may even be
formally invalid and almost certainly hard to find any documentation
for at all. As M$oft are now threatening to eat their own young
(sorry, sue their own Most Valued Professionals for unspecified
copyright infringement), then I for one have no interest in knowing
any more about their products.

Re: Mix of xml and html

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:33:41 GMT Andy Dingley scribed:

> On 24 Jun, 21:29, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>> I wonder what this header does mean:
>>
>>
>>
>
> "MS"? In a HTML context?
>
> It means, "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Render Here"

Nay, Androcles, it means "Abandon all hope, ye who render here."

(I had a persnickety prof once whom rf reminds me of...)

--
Neredbojias
He who laughs last sounds like an idiot.

Re: Mix of xml and html

On 26 Jun, 00:53, Neredbojias wrote:

> > It means, "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Render Here"
>
> Nay, Androcles, it means "Abandon all hope, ye who render here."
>
> (I had a persnickety prof once whom rf reminds me of...)

The original source is of course, "Lasciate ogne speranza, voi
ch'intrate"

How you translate this depends on who's translation you favour. Your
prof appears to have liked the Rev. Cary's, even though this is
generally agreed to have been a bad and Bowdlerised translation in
general (I only read mine for the pictures). It's probably the closest
literal translation though.

Dorothy L. Sayers is a much-loved translation overall, but this is one
of those instances where she went just a bit florid.

The translation I usually read myself is Mark Musa's generally good
one and he's one of the few sources for the version I cited (possibly
a mistake? or why if it's a deliberate change?). It's arguably
inaccurate as a translation and contrary to the author's intention
(Should one lose _all_ hope? Should _all_ lose hope?). However in
fairness to M$oft (I don't say that often), I think it's closer to my
meaning for its adaption. I'm not _that_ mean to them as to suggest
that nothing ever works, but they are ubiquitous.

Obviously who we need here is an Italian web designer...

Re: Mix of xml and html

Andy Dingley wrote:

>>>It means, "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Render Here"
>>
>>Nay, Androcles, it means "Abandon all hope, ye who render here."[*]

In the current context I'd say: "Abandon all rendering, no hope here"

> The original source is of course, "Lasciate ogne speranza, voi
> ch'intrate"

According to my italo-latin knowledge, that's equivalent to the
second[*] translation, provided that "render" here means "enter" (intrare).

DoDi

Re: Mix of xml and html

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:00:17 GMT Andy Dingley scribed:

> On 26 Jun, 00:53, Neredbojias wrote:
>
>> > It means, "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Render Here"
>>
>> Nay, Androcles, it means "Abandon all hope, ye who render here."
>>
>> (I had a persnickety prof once whom rf reminds me of...)
>
> The original source is of course, "Lasciate ogne speranza, voi
> ch'intrate"
>
> How you translate this depends on who's translation you favour. Your
> prof appears to have liked the Rev. Cary's, even though this is
> generally agreed to have been a bad and Bowdlerised translation in
> general (I only read mine for the pictures). It's probably the closest
> literal translation though.
>
> Dorothy L. Sayers is a much-loved translation overall, but this is one
> of those instances where she went just a bit florid.
>
> The translation I usually read myself is Mark Musa's generally good
> one and he's one of the few sources for the version I cited (possibly
> a mistake? or why if it's a deliberate change?). It's arguably
> inaccurate as a translation and contrary to the author's intention
> (Should one lose _all_ hope? Should _all_ lose hope?). However in
> fairness to M$oft (I don't say that often), I think it's closer to my
> meaning for its adaption. I'm not _that_ mean to them as to suggest
> that nothing ever works, but they are ubiquitous.

Well, I read the "DC Classics" version myself, and in there it said...

Seriously, you seem to be better versed in it than I (-pun intended.)
However, I did (ab)use the line once in a story of my own and really
couldn't remember where the "all" went so I looked it up. My 'prof' was
a spinster-to-be named McCarthy who gave me a well-done for sitting in
the front row.

> Obviously who we need here is an Italian web designer...

Luigi! Oh, no!!

--
Neredbojias

Once I had a little bird
That made me rather hasty.
So now I have no little bird,
But it was very tasty.