I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
the frame while scrolling. Can this be inserted this into a style.css file?
Thanks!
--
Message posted via http://www.webmasterkb.com
On 2007-07-23, jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com
> I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
> will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
> the frame while scrolling. Can this be inserted this into a style.css file?
> Thanks!
You could make a graduated black image that goes from fully transparent
at the bottom to fully opaque at the top and superimpose it over the top
of the frame with absolute positioning.
Genius idea! But how do I get the text to go behind the graduated image?
This is on a wordpress blog, and I don't see any html file, just all .phps
with a style.css. where would I even put in the code to do this correctly?
Ben C wrote:
>> I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
>> will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
>> the frame while scrolling. Can this be inserted this into a style.css file?
>> Thanks!
>
>You could make a graduated black image that goes from fully transparent
>at the bottom to fully opaque at the top and superimpose it over the top
>of the frame with absolute positioning.
--
Message posted via WebmasterKB.com
http://www.webmasterkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/html-dev/200707/1
I think I know what your saying to do, to put an absolute image position on
the .html that opens the frames. But I would also want the same effect on
the bottom of the frame, how would I determine an absolute location when
taking into account all the different browsers and screen/window sizes?
jakeatkins wrote:
>Genius idea! But how do I get the text to go behind the graduated image?
>This is on a wordpress blog, and I don't see any html file, just all .phps
>with a style.css. where would I even put in the code to do this correctly?
>
>>> I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
>>> will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
>[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>at the bottom to fully opaque at the top and superimpose it over the top
>>of the frame with absolute positioning.
--
Message posted via http://www.webmasterkb.com
Ben C
> On 2007-07-23, jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com
>> I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
>> will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
>> the frame while scrolling. Can this be inserted this into a style.css file?
>> Thanks!
>
> You could make a graduated black image that goes from fully transparent
> at the bottom to fully opaque at the top and superimpose it over the top
> of the frame with absolute positioning.
That was my first thought as well. But, a gradient alpha channel means PNG;
GIF has only one-bit alpha and JPEG none at all. Doesn't IE have "issues"
with its support for PNG?
sherm--
--
Web Hosting by West Virginians, for West Virginians: http://wv-www.net
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
On 2007-07-23, jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com
> Ben C wrote:
>>> I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
>>> will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
>>> the frame while scrolling. Can this be inserted this into a style.css file?
>>> Thanks!
>>
>>You could make a graduated black image that goes from fully transparent
>>at the bottom to fully opaque at the top and superimpose it over the top
>>of the frame with absolute positioning.
> Genius idea! But how do I get the text to go behind the graduated image?
Absolutely positioned things go on top of other things generally anyway.
> This is on a wordpress blog, and I don't see any html file, just all .phps
> with a style.css. where would I even put in the code to do this correctly?
Don't know. You mean you can only add styles and not HTML?
I've put this in the top of the specific frame's index.php:
It shows up in the frame over top of text, but doesn't move with the
scrolling, just stays where it was dropped...? Does the absolute image code
need to go in the .html file with the framesets? Where would I put it since
there is no body tags in the frameset.html?
Ben C wrote:
>>>> I'm looking for some kind of effect where the text/images shown in a frame
>>>> will gradually fade to black within 25 pixels of the top and bottom border of
>[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>>at the bottom to fully opaque at the top and superimpose it over the top
>>>of the frame with absolute positioning.
>
>> Genius idea! But how do I get the text to go behind the graduated image?
>
>Absolutely positioned things go on top of other things generally anyway.
>
>> This is on a wordpress blog, and I don't see any html file, just all .phps
>> with a style.css. where would I even put in the code to do this correctly?
>
>Don't know. You mean you can only add styles and not HTML?
--
Message posted via WebmasterKB.com
http://www.webmasterkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/html-dev/200707/1
Sherm Pendley wrote:
>
> a gradient alpha channel means PNG;
> Doesn't IE have "issues" with its support for PNG?
I believe IE7 does (mostly?) support png alpha transparency, but IE6 has
its own weird way of handling it with a proprietary CSS "filter"
property. It does require ActiveX enabled to work, though. If disabled,
I believe you get no background image at all, which could be a
readability problem.
--
Berg
jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com wrote:
> I've put this in the top of the specific frame's index.php:
>
>
>
> It shows up in the frame over top of text, but doesn't move with the
> scrolling, just stays where it was dropped...? Does the absolute image code
> need to go in the .html file with the framesets? Where would I put it since
> there is no body tags in the frameset.html?
>
>
please stop top posting!
--
www.daszeichen.ch
remove nixspam to reply
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Yorkshire Pete wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2007 Bernhard Sturm wrote in alt.html
>
> Why?
>
>> jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com wrote:
>>> I've put this in the top of the specific frame's index.php:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It shows up in the frame over top of text, but doesn't move with the
>>> scrolling, just stays where it was dropped...? Does the absolute image
>>> code need to go in the .html file with the framesets? Where would I
>>> put it since there is no body tags in the frameset.html?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> please stop top posting!
>>
>>
>
Because now no one can easily decipher who was replying to whom.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Yorkshire Pete
> On 23 Jul 2007 Bernhard Sturm wrote in alt.html
>
>> please stop top posting!
>
> Why?
Because it's rude, and you've been asked nicely to do so.
sherm--
--
Web Hosting by West Virginians, for West Virginians: http://wv-www.net
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:09:04 GMT
Yorkshire Pete scribed:
> On 23 Jul 2007 Bernhard Sturm wrote in alt.html
>
> Why?
>
>> jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com wrote:
>>> I've put this in the top of the specific frame's index.php:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It shows up in the frame over top of text, but doesn't move with the
>>> scrolling, just stays where it was dropped...? Does the absolute image
>>> code need to go in the .html file with the framesets? Where would I
>>> put it since there is no body tags in the frameset.html?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> please stop top posting!
Youse is sooooooo bad! Now I see why The Lone Ranger replaced you with
Tonto.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
On Jul 23, 8:18 pm, Bernhard Sturm
> jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com wrote:
> please stop top posting!
Maybe you could explain to him what top posting is...
On Jul 23, 9:18 pm, Sherm Pendley
> >> please stop top posting!
> > Why?
> Because it's rude, and you've been asked nicely to do so.
Well I don't think "rude" is correct, you want to do it because it is
the standard for this particular group. Other groups prefer other
formats.
As far as being asked nicely, well, I thought that the request was
actually a little rude. It would have been so much nicer if the
request came with an explanation of what the problem was rather than
just blerting out "please stop top posting!" The exclamation point at
the end turned a request into a demand.
I believe we all need a group hug in this thread. Come-on... even you
Neredbojias...
Travis Newbury wrote:
>
> Well I don't think "rude" is correct, you want to do it because it is
> the standard for this particular group. Other groups prefer other
> formats.
So there are groups that prefer top-posting? I wonder if this really
exists. I admit: I got a bit pissed by reading the thread because I
wasn't able to follow it properly as the top-posting made it impossible
to determine who wrote what in response to whoms text.
> It would have been so much nicer if the
> request came with an explanation of what the problem was rather than
> just blerting out "please stop top posting!" The exclamation point at
> the end turned a request into a demand.
Indeed. It was a demand. It's a bit like 'Do not cross!' when you come
to a red traffic light.
>
> I believe we all need a group hug in this thread. Come-on... even you
> Neredbojias...
>
I love you, and I love the group, and we all love each other, but don't
top post! And always submit a URL! And don't expect this to be a
help-desk! :-)
cheers
bernhard
--
www.daszeichen.ch
remove nixspam to reply
This is an example of top-posting (see below).
Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Jul 23, 8:18 pm, Bernhard Sturm
>> jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com wrote:
>> please stop top posting!
>
> Maybe you could explain to him what top posting is...
>
Top posting is, when you enter your text above all others text within a
message (see above).
HTH
bernhard
--
www.daszeichen.ch
remove nixspam to reply
On 2007-07-23, jakeatkins via WebmasterKB.com
> I've put this in the top of the specific frame's index.php:
>
>
>
> It shows up in the frame over top of text, but doesn't move with the
> scrolling, just stays where it was dropped...?
Yes, I thought that was what you wanted-- so that as things scrolled out
of view at the top and bottom they sort of faded away.
> Does the absolute image code need to go in the .html file with the
> framesets?
> Where would I put it since there is no body tags in the frameset.html?
Well the
But I don't really understand any more what the effect is that you want.
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:19:59 GMT
Travis Newbury scribed:
> As far as being asked nicely, well, I thought that the request was
> actually a little rude. It would have been so much nicer if the
> request came with an explanation of what the problem was rather than
> just blerting out "please stop top posting!" The exclamation point at
> the end turned a request into a demand.
>
> I believe we all need a group hug in this thread. Come-on... even you
> Neredbojias...
Whaddya think I am, a homo? How rude!
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:47 GMT
Yorkshire Pete scribed:
>>>> please stop top posting!
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> Because it's rude, and you've been asked nicely to do so.
>>
>> sherm--
>>
>
> It's rude not to get your facts straight. Nobody asked me not top post.
What did you want, -a personal invitation?
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
In article
<1185272399.630716.26330@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>,
Travis Newbury
> I believe we all need a group hug in this thread.
You mean like a sort of scrum in rugby but we are all on the same
side? What goes on in those scrums is not always very nice at
all... perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
--
dorayme
dorayme wrote:
> In article
> <1185272399.630716.26330@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>,
> Travis Newbury
>
>> I believe we all need a group hug in this thread.
>
> You mean like a sort of scrum in rugby but we are all on the same
> side? What goes on in those scrums is not always very nice at
> all... perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
> again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
or "Deliverance"
In article <13acusgah3cbcaf@corp.supernews.com>, "Gwin" <~@~>
wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In article
> > <1185272399.630716.26330@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>,
> > Travis Newbury
> >
> >> I believe we all need a group hug in this thread.
> >
> > You mean like a sort of scrum in rugby but we are all on the same
> > side? What goes on in those scrums is not always very nice at
> > all... perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
> > again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
>
> or "Deliverance"
Now that was a nice little chummy bonding little holiday trip for
3...
One reason that was such a good film was that it was made by John
Boorman (he made one of the greatest films of all time, 'Point
Blank')
--
dorayme
Yorkshire Pete
> On 23 Jul 2007 Sherm Pendley wrote in alt.html
>
>> Yorkshire Pete
>>
>>> On 23 Jul 2007 Bernhard Sturm wrote in alt.html
>>>
>>>> please stop top posting!
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> Because it's rude, and you've been asked nicely to do so.
>
> It's rude not to get your facts straight. Nobody asked me not top post.
No, Bernhard asked you not to. You even quoted his request, twice. You're
either hopelessly illiterate or deliberately trolling - either way, your
application for admission to my killfile has been approved and expedited.
*plonk*
sherm--
--
Web Hosting by West Virginians, for West Virginians: http://wv-www.net
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:55:33
GMT Yorkshire Pete scribed:
> On 24 Jul 2007 Neredbojias wrote in alt.html
>
>> Whaddya think I am, a homo?
>
> So being a cross dresser has nothing to do with your sexual
> disorientation?
Only when I don't wear underwear in a tight skirt.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:48:15 GMT
Yorkshire Pete scribed:
> On 24 Jul 2007 Neredbojias wrote in alt.html
>
>> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:10:47
>> GMT Yorkshire Pete scribed:
>>
>>>>>> please stop top posting!
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> Because it's rude, and you've been asked nicely to do so.
>>>>
>>>> sherm--
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's rude not to get your facts straight. Nobody asked me not top post.
>>
>> What did you want, -a personal invitation?
>>
>
> Yup.
Gawd, I just read Sherm's latest. You ain't been back 2 weeks and already
you're alienating the natives. You didn't happen to spend any significant
part of your life in Australia, didja?
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
In article
Duende
> Who the bloody hell are you to be DEMANDIND anything?
Who the bloody hell is who?
--
dorayme
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
In article
Duende
> On 24 Jul 2007 dorayme wrote in alt.html
>
> > In article
> > Duende
> >
> >> Who the bloody hell are you to be DEMANDIND anything?
> >
> > Who the bloody hell is who?
> >
> On 24 Jul 2007 Bernhard Sturm wrote in alt.html
>
But is BS demanding anything? And is there something wrong with
demands? What the hell is going on? Are we all moving into some
post-modernist huggly snuggly era?
--
dorayme
Sherm Pendley
> No, Bernhard asked you not to. You even quoted his request, twice. You're
> either hopelessly illiterate or deliberately trolling - either way, your
> application for admission to my killfile has been approved and expedited.
>
> *plonk*
When the regulars [cough] start plonking the irregular regulars (you
don't know who "Yorkshire Pete" is, do you?) over a freakin'
tongue-in-cheek joke, things around here are getting way too serious.
Talk about HTML for ${deity}'s sake, and get over the illusion that
you're in some kind of exclusive club.
Sheesh.
--
Joel.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:39:36
GMT Yorkshire Pete scribed:
>>>>>>>> please stop top posting!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because it's rude, and you've been asked nicely to do so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sherm--
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's rude not to get your facts straight. Nobody asked me not top
>>>>> post.
>>>>
>>>> What did you want, -a personal invitation?
>
> Still waiting.
>
>>>
>>> Yup.
>>
>> Gawd, I just read Sherm's latest.
>
> That was good for a giggle. I do prefer the term fishing rather than
> trolling though. Sounds a bit more genteel.
'Ceptin' if your diggin' for bougars.
>> You ain't been back 2 weeks and
>> already you're alienating the natives. You didn't happen to spend any
>> significant part of your life in Australia, didja?
>>
> Nope, I'm just a simple mountain boy from Coloado.
Er, well, the alpine simplicity shows. Of course you _could have_ pulled
a dorayme, too. -Call him a schmuck; show the bastard that there's other
things on this good earth besides newsgroups, conventions, and top-
posting! However, its' nice to see you have more class than that even if
you are a mountainbilly, and I think what you did say was considerably
more effective, anyway.
Live long and propser, Colora!
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:37:52
GMT Joel Shepherd scribed:
> Sherm Pendley
>
>> No, Bernhard asked you not to. You even quoted his request, twice.
>> You're either hopelessly illiterate or deliberately trolling - either
>> way, your application for admission to my killfile has been approved
>> and expedited.
>>
>> *plonk*
>
> When the regulars [cough] start plonking the irregular regulars (you
> don't know who "Yorkshire Pete" is, do you?) over a freakin'
> tongue-in-cheek joke, things around here are getting way too serious.
Hell, I'm surprised _you_ know he's constipated. 'Course, I guess it
shows.
> Talk about HTML for ${deity}'s sake, and get over the illusion that
> you're in some kind of exclusive club.
>
> Sheesh.
Quite agree.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
On Jul 24, 4:45 pm, Neredbojias
> > I believe we all need a group hug in this thread. Come-on... even you
> > Neredbojias...
> Whaddya think I am, a homo? How rude!
I was speaking of a pure heterosexual man to man kind of group hug
that contains no gayness at all. Kind of like bumping sweaty hairy
beer bellies after your team scores on the field....
On Jul 24, 7:56 pm, Neredbojias
> >> Whaddya think I am, a homo?
> > So being a cross dresser has nothing to do with your sexual
> > disorientation?
> Only when I don't wear underwear in a tight skirt.
No undies is better than damn panty lines! (and I hate the way a thong
rubs against my ass when I gyrate so those are out...)
On Jul 24, 6:17 pm, dorayme
> perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
> again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
Your dating yourself....
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:28:13 GMT
Travis Newbury scribed:
> On Jul 24, 7:56 pm, Neredbojias
>> >> Whaddya think I am, a homo?
>> > So being a cross dresser has nothing to do with your sexual
>> > disorientation?
>> Only when I don't wear underwear in a tight skirt.
>
> No undies is better than damn panty lines! (and I hate the way a thong
> rubs against my ass when I gyrate so those are out...)
Perhaps, but jockstrap bulge can be advantageous 'round a covey of covetous
cuties.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:25:50 GMT
Travis Newbury scribed:
> On Jul 24, 4:45 pm, Neredbojias
>> > I believe we all need a group hug in this thread. Come-on... even you
>> > Neredbojias...
>> Whaddya think I am, a homo? How rude!
>
> I was speaking of a pure heterosexual man to man kind of group hug
> that contains no gayness at all. Kind of like bumping sweaty hairy
> beer bellies after your team scores on the field....
The members of my team don't do that. We're much more genteel. We pat
asses whether we score or not.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:28:59 GMT
Travis Newbury scribed:
> On Jul 24, 6:17 pm, dorayme
>> perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
>> again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
>
> Your dating yourself....
Well, she may have faults, but I don't think she's a lesbian.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
I know a group that typically top posts, with sig lines like this...
--
how cruel is that?
Bernhard Sturm wrote:
> So there are groups that prefer top-posting? I wonder if this really
> exists.
But that's an odd group for sure!
It lets people browse quick & automatically trims the message so it's
perfectly valid once you get used to it.
In article
<1185359339.030599.83990@l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Travis Newbury
> On Jul 24, 6:17 pm, dorayme
> > perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
> > again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
>
> Your dating yourself....
There are worse things to date, take your biggest and most
disastrous date to date: George Bush.
--
dorayme
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:40:23 GMT
Yorkshire Pete scribed:
> On 25 Jul 2007 Neredbojias wrote in alt.html
>
>>> I was speaking of a pure heterosexual man to man kind of group hug
>>> that contains no gayness at all. Kind of like bumping sweaty hairy
>>> beer bellies after your team scores on the field....
>>
>> The members of my team don't do that. We're much more genteel. We pat
>> asses whether we score or not.
>>
>
> Pat enough asses and you are sure to score...something.
I had to quit the team. My fingers were turning brown.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:43:13 GMT
Duende scribed:
> On 24 Jul 2007 Neredbojias wrote in alt.html
>
>>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>> When the regulars [cough] start plonking the irregular regulars (you
>>> don't know who "Yorkshire Pete" is, do you?) over a freakin'
>>> tongue-in-cheek joke, things around here are getting way too serious.
>>
>> Hell, I'm surprised _you_ know he's constipated. 'Course, I guess it
>> shows.
>>
>
> Hey, be nice.
I was just joshin'. I think you're cool, man, and that's a true sentiment.
But since The Saucy Aussie had a meltdown, who's left to pick on?
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
On Jul 25, 9:58 pm, Neredbojias
> > Pat enough asses and you are sure to score...something.
> I had to quit the team. My fingers were turning brown.
Ok.... Now we have passed a line....
Duende
> On 24 Jul 2007 Joel Shepherd wrote in alt.html
>
> > (you don't know who "Yorkshire Pete" is, do you?)
>
> Do you?
Hell no. But _you_ might!
--
Joel.
dorayme
>Travis Newbury
>
> > On Jul 24, 6:17 pm, dorayme
> > > perhaps it would be safer for me to just go and see once
> > > again, the film 'Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice'
> >
> > Your dating yourself....
>
> There are worse things to date, take your biggest and most
> disastrous date to date: George Bush.
I've heard -- heard, not necessarily believed, witnessed first hand,
accepted on faith, etc. -- that George and his gal are quite charming,
warm, friendly, down-home kind of folk. Heck, he even winked at the
Queen.
Of course, being charming has never been a qualification for effectively
running a government, a point that seems lost on a frightening
percentage of the population.
I also have heard he likes the BLINK element (struggling vainly to stay
a shade on-topic).
--
Joel.
In article
Joel Shepherd
> ... George ...
>
> ... frightening ...
> ... population.
>
> I also have heard he likes the BLINK element (struggling vainly to stay
> a shade on-topic).
With my own keen sense of topic - blink, blink - I see three
words here that catch my eye: frightening, population and George.
These three make me wince with pain. This idiot, along with his
more cunning counterpoints in other Western countries (read
Australia in particular) have made sure to concede the biggest
victory to terrorist forces by their words and policies. In rank
stupidity lies the ultimate cowardice hidden by a veneer of
bravado.
--
dorayme