Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 12:14:20 von Froefel
I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes... trying
to accomplish it in CSS it's taken me over 2 hours already. I'm sure
someone with CSS knowledge has a 5-minute solution to my problem...
Anyway, just venting a little bit.. here goes:
I'm trying to create a box with a header, using DIVs. The box should
look like this:
----------------------------------------------
| Panel Header |
|--------------------------------------------|
| Panel Content |
| |
| |
|--------------------------------------------|
The Panel Header should have a left and rigfht margin of 5px and a top
and bottom margin of 2px. The Header has a gradient background image
and should not have a border.
The Panel Content should have an all-round margin of 5px and a 1px
border.
The CSS I have so far is:
..PanelHeader {
width:100%;
height:15px;
padding:2px 5px 2px 5px;
cursor: pointer;
vertical-align: middle;
background-image: url(images/bg-collapsepanel_green.png);
background-repeat:repeat-x;
color:#FFF;
font-weight:bold;
}
..PanelContent {
border:1px solid #334444;
width:100%;
padding:5px;
}
The markup is something like this:
Some content on the left |
Content text
|
I'm having 2 problems:
1. The Content portion stick out by 2px to the right instead of being
aligned with the Header portion
2. The Header and Content are wider than the TD in which they are
contained. Because the TD is part of a table that has a width=100%,
the Header and Content DIVs actually extend beyond the browser window.
Now I have read up on how both margin and padding add pixels to the
element's basic dimensions. but if that's the case, how on earth can
one create the effect of INNER margins or padding, like how it works
for tables??
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-- Hans
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 13:34:16 von TravisNewbury
On Jul 26, 6:14 am, Froefel wrote:
> I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
> Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes...
So I ask you. Is it worth the effort? What will your visitors gain?
Have you had people tell you they will never visit your site because
you used tables for layout? If you are having this much trouble with
"something very basic" what kind of trouble are you going to have when
you run into something more difficult?
Sorry, I don't believe the benefits outweigh the efforts in a straight
conversion of a site. Now, if you were starting from scratch? Then I
would say yea, take a look at CSS layout. But not if you are
converting just to convert.
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 16:28:52 von Froefel
Actually this is a brand new intranet application in which a lot of
things are a first for me... first ASP.NET project, first time trying
to implement table-less layout... and first time juggling the pros and
cons of Ajax.NET.
So, anyone wanting to help me get the style definition, please let me
know...
-- Hans
On Jul 26, 1:34 pm, Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Jul 26, 6:14 am, Froefel wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
> > Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes...
>
> So I ask you. Is it worth the effort? What will your visitors gain?
> Have you had people tell you they will never visit your site because
> you used tables for layout? If you are having this much trouble with
> "something very basic" what kind of trouble are you going to have when
> you run into something more difficult?
>
> Sorry, I don't believe the benefits outweigh the efforts in a straight
> conversion of a site. Now, if you were starting from scratch? Then I
> would say yea, take a look at CSS layout. But not if you are
> converting just to convert.
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 17:20:33 von TravisNewbury
On Jul 26, 10:28 am, Froefel wrote:
> Actually this is a brand new intranet application in which a lot of
> things are a first for me... first ASP.NET project, first time trying
> to implement table-less layout... and first time juggling the pros and
> cons of Ajax.NET.
First, top posting is a no-no here.
Now, if you post a URL of your problem you will receive a ton of
answers. Then slowly the conversation will turn to a Flash no flash
argument, and it will end in a huge group hug...
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 18:03:34 von Neredbojias
Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:14:20 GMT
Froefel scribed:
> Now I have read up on how both margin and padding add pixels to the
> element's basic dimensions. but if that's the case, how on earth can
> one create the effect of INNER margins or padding, like how it works
> for tables??
Put a div in a div, the outer of which has no border, margins, or padding.
--
Neredbojias
Half lies are worth twice as much as whole lies.
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 18:35:04 von Bernhard Sturm
Froefel wrote:
> Actually this is a brand new intranet application in which a lot of
> things are a first for me... first ASP.NET project, first time trying
> to implement table-less layout... and first time juggling the pros and
> cons of Ajax.NET.
>
Sounds challenging. I hope you aren't doing this in a professional
environment, and it's just a try for yourself in order to get hands on
those completely new technologies for you.
> So, anyone wanting to help me get the style definition, please let me
> know...
>
give us a URL, and we will give you some hints. For a start: drop your
table wrapper. The box you would like to get should be structured as
follows:
But I can't tell you more about a possible solution, as I can't see the
rest of your source. So post a URL.
cheers
bernhard
--
www.daszeichen.ch
remove nixspam to reply
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 23:06:10 von Ben C
On 2007-07-26, Froefel wrote:
> I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
> Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes... trying
> to accomplish it in CSS it's taken me over 2 hours already. I'm sure
> someone with CSS knowledge has a 5-minute solution to my problem...
> Anyway, just venting a little bit.. here goes:
>
> I'm trying to create a box with a header, using DIVs. The box should
> look like this:
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>| Panel Header |
>|--------------------------------------------|
>| Panel Content |
>| |
>| |
>|--------------------------------------------|
>
> The Panel Header should have a left and rigfht margin of 5px and a top
> and bottom margin of 2px. The Header has a gradient background image
> and should not have a border.
> The Panel Content should have an all-round margin of 5px and a 1px
> border.
>
> The CSS I have so far is:
> .PanelHeader {
> width:100%;
^^^^^^^^^^
Leave this out
> height:15px;
> padding:2px 5px 2px 5px;
> cursor: pointer;
> vertical-align: middle;
> background-image: url(images/bg-collapsepanel_green.png);
> background-repeat:repeat-x;
> color:#FFF;
> font-weight:bold;
> }
> .PanelContent {
> border:1px solid #334444;
> width:100%;
^^^^^^^^^^^
And this
> padding:5px;
> }
>
> The markup is something like this:
>
>
> Some content on the left |
>
>
> Content text
> |
>
>
I thought you were trying to do without a table?
> I'm having 2 problems:
> 1. The Content portion stick out by 2px to the right instead of being
> aligned with the Header portion
Don't use width: 100% and that will go away. Width sets the width of the
content area, borders padding and margin are extra.
> 2. The Header and Content are wider than the TD in which they are
> contained. Because the TD is part of a table that has a width=100%,
> the Header and Content DIVs actually extend beyond the browser window.
You almost never need width: 100% on normal flow block boxes (things
like divs). They're not like tables (whose auto width is
"shrink-to-fit"). Instead their auto width is "greedy".
> Now I have read up on how both margin and padding add pixels to the
> element's basic dimensions. but if that's the case, how on earth can
> one create the effect of INNER margins or padding, like how it works
> for tables??
You can't although there are some proposed CSS3 properties (things like
box-sizing: border-box) but most of the time you don't need to. Just
don't set widths on divs at all and they will slot into their containers
perfectly.
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 23:15:15 von dorayme
In article
<1185449656.672663.317530@l70g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Travis Newbury wrote:
> On Jul 26, 6:14 am, Froefel wrote:
> > I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
> > Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes...
>
> So I ask you. Is it worth the effort? What will your visitors gain?
> Have you had people tell you they will never visit your site because
> you used tables for layout? If you are having this much trouble with
> "something very basic" what kind of trouble are you going to have when
> you run into something more difficult?
>
> Sorry, I don't believe the benefits outweigh the efforts in a straight
> conversion of a site. Now, if you were starting from scratch? Then I
> would say yea, take a look at CSS layout. But not if you are
> converting just to convert.
Where did he say he had a site in tables and was wanting to
convert? Wanting to know how to do something he can easily do and
has done for a demo here in tables is quite different.
--
dorayme
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 26.07.2007 23:22:43 von dorayme
In article
<1185444860.903353.11430@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
Froefel wrote:
> I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
> Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes...
Except that the table you provide the code for does not look
anything like the ASCII drawing you present as an illustration of
what is wanted. Best to at least get the table to express what is
wanted and to post a url.
--
dorayme
Re: Simple CSS box question
am 27.07.2007 11:23:15 von Froefel
Thanks to Ben C I jumped a huge step forward. Knowing that tables need
a width=100% in order to take up the entire width of a container
whereas DIV's do that without specifying a width fixed all my problems
(well, at least the ones described in my post).
Armed with this knowledge, I can now go back and get rid of the
container table as well and use floating DIV's. Thanks to everyone for
your input.
-- Hans
On Jul 26, 11:06 pm, Ben C wrote:
> On 2007-07-26, Froefel wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to do something very basic, using CSS instead of tables.
> > Doing it the table-way I would have been done in 5 minutes... trying
> > to accomplish it in CSS it's taken me over 2 hours already. I'm sure
> > someone with CSS knowledge has a 5-minute solution to my problem...
> > Anyway, just venting a little bit.. here goes:
>
> > I'm trying to create a box with a header, using DIVs. The box should
> > look like this:
>
> > ----------------------------------------------
> >| Panel Header |
> >|--------------------------------------------|
> >| Panel Content |
> >| |
> >| |
> >|--------------------------------------------|
>
> > The Panel Header should have a left and rigfht margin of 5px and a top
> > and bottom margin of 2px. The Header has a gradient background image
> > and should not have a border.
> > The Panel Content should have an all-round margin of 5px and a 1px
> > border.
>
> > The CSS I have so far is:
> > .PanelHeader {
> > width:100%;
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Leave this out
>
> > height:15px;
> > padding:2px 5px 2px 5px;
> > cursor: pointer;
> > vertical-align: middle;
> > background-image: url(images/bg-collapsepanel_green.png);
> > background-repeat:repeat-x;
> > color:#FFF;
> > font-weight:bold;
> > }
> > .PanelContent {
> > border:1px solid #334444;
> > width:100%;
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> And this
>
> > padding:5px;
> > }
>
> > The markup is something like this:
> >
> >
> > Some content on the left |
> >
> >
> > Content text
> > |
> >
> >
>
> I thought you were trying to do without a table?
>
> > I'm having 2 problems:
> > 1. The Content portion stick out by 2px to the right instead of being
> > aligned with the Header portion
>
> Don't use width: 100% and that will go away. Width sets the width of the
> content area, borders padding and margin are extra.
>
> > 2. The Header and Content are wider than the TD in which they are
> > contained. Because the TD is part of a table that has a width=100%,
> > the Header and Content DIVs actually extend beyond the browser window.
>
> You almost never need width: 100% on normal flow block boxes (things
> like divs). They're not like tables (whose auto width is
> "shrink-to-fit"). Instead their auto width is "greedy".
>
> > Now I have read up on how both margin and padding add pixels to the
> > element's basic dimensions. but if that's the case, how on earth can
> > one create the effect of INNER margins or padding, like how it works
> > for tables??
>
> You can't although there are some proposed CSS3 properties (things like
> box-sizing: border-box) but most of the time you don't need to. Just
> don't set widths on divs at all and they will slot into their containers
> perfectly.