HOT WORKING PROXY
am 19.08.2007 18:12:20 von Extreme90HOT WORKING PROXY
http://myorkutnow.info/
HOT WORKING PROXY
http://myorkutnow.info/
In message <1187539940.467384.140670@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
at 16:12:20 on Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Extreme90
>PROXY
>
Why? So you can capture sensitive data?
--
Mike News
"Extreme90"
news:1187539940.467384.140670@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> HOT WORKING PROXY
> http://myorkutnow.info/
>
How about using one of the subsription services instead?
They are better, more reliable, and some of them use
varyiing IPs and ports, forcing admins to play "whack a
mole" if they want to stop it.
Chilly8 wrote:
> How about using one of the subsription services instead?
> They are better, more reliable, and some of them use
> varyiing IPs and ports, forcing admins to play "whack a
> mole" if they want to stop it.
Please do not feed the trolls!
Chilly8 wrote:
> "Extreme90"
> news:1187539940.467384.140670@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>> HOT WORKING PROXY
>> http://myorkutnow.info/
>>
>
>
> How about using one of the subsription services instead?
> They are better, more reliable, and some of them use
> varyiing IPs and ports, forcing admins to play "whack a
> mole" if they want to stop it.
Paying money to route all your traffic in clear text over a specific system?
People are really following every stupid idea on the net...
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Chilly8 wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>
> "Sebastian G."
> news:5irlc3F3qael9U1@mid.dfncis.de...
>> Chilly8 wrote:
>>
>>> "Extreme90"
>>> news:1187539940.467384.140670@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>>> HOT WORKING PROXY
>>>> http://myorkutnow.info/
>>>>
>>>
>>> How about using one of the subsription services instead?
>>> They are better, more reliable, and some of them use
>>> varyiing IPs and ports, forcing admins to play "whack a
>>> mole" if they want to stop it.
>>
>> Paying money to route all your traffic in clear text over a specific
>> system?
>> People are really following every stupid idea on the net...
>
>
> One service that was down for a while, but now back up again,
> uses encryption to route your data to the anonymity service.
Any the service owner himself gets it decrypted. And router over his
machine. Directly piped to whatever the NSA likes to attach.
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Chilly8 wrote:
>It is based in
> Mexico. While it was down for a while, it is back. I thought that
> maybe the owner croaked or something, being that the service
> is hosted in Bajamar, one of the biggest over 55 communities
> in North America. Bajamar is an upscale 55 and over community
> about 20 miles north of Ensenada. Even if the owner is likely
> an Amreican retiree, the NSA still has NO jurisdiction at Bajamar,
> becuase it is in Mexico. The American retirees that are running
> the service to make some extra income are ONLY subject
> to MEXICAN laws, because their service is incorporated
> in Mexico.
that is funny
i'm just visualizing those old geezers in bermuda shorts running a secret server room
in that compound - wearing H4x0r t-shirts ....
SCNR
M
"mak"
news:1187620901.698211@nntpcache01.si.eunet.at...
> Chilly8 wrote:
>>It is based in
>> Mexico. While it was down for a while, it is back. I thought that
>> maybe the owner croaked or something, being that the service
>> is hosted in Bajamar, one of the biggest over 55 communities
>> in North America. Bajamar is an upscale 55 and over community
>> about 20 miles north of Ensenada. Even if the owner is likely
>> an Amreican retiree, the NSA still has NO jurisdiction at Bajamar,
>> becuase it is in Mexico. The American retirees that are running
>> the service to make some extra income are ONLY subject
>> to MEXICAN laws, because their service is incorporated
>> in Mexico.
>
>
> that is funny
> i'm just visualizing those old geezers in bermuda shorts running a secret
> server room
> in that compound - wearing H4x0r t-shirts ....
>
> SCNR
>
> M
You have to consider that todays retirees are much more
knowledgable about computers, and it will become even
more so as the "boomers" reach retirement age, so more
retirees will likely set up some kind of internet based business
to bring in a little extra income. And DSL service is
available there now. Thanks to advancing technology,
DSL is now available in many areas as far out as 6 miles
from the CO. This makes it possible to bring high speed
DSL service to Bajamar, and allow this anonymity service
to be run out of somebody's home. As long as applicable
taxes are paid to IMER (Mexico's equivalent to the IRS),
such a service is fully legal in Mexico. Also, ANY
Internet business run from Bajamar, or ANYWHERE in
Mexico is NOT SUBJECT to ANY United States laws,
even if the owners are American citizens. Its quite simple,
If you do not LIVE in the United States, then you are NOT
SUBJECT to United States laws.
The demographics of the over 55 communities are changing
now. Today's retirees are more sophisticated than they were
just a few years ago. Today's retirees are much more computer
literate, then just a few years ago.
> If you do not LIVE in the United States, then you are NOT
> SUBJECT to United States laws.
Which is, of course, incorrect.
There are a lot of situations, where the USofA claim the right
to excersise their laws outside of their territory.
Same holds true for Germany for example: Anything with
origin _or_ destination _or_ effect on German citizen might
fall under German jurisdiction.
Cheers,
Jens
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
> Same thing for Germany. The ONLY German laws that
> apply OUTSIDE of Germany are those regarding taxes
> and coyright, as per international treaties, but ALL OTHER
> German laws DO NOT APPLY outside of Germany, if
> you do not LIVE in Germany.
Bullshit.
Jens Hoffmann
>> Same thing for Germany. The ONLY German laws that apply OUTSIDE of
>> Germany are those regarding taxes and coyright, as per international
>> treaties, but ALL OTHER German laws DO NOT APPLY outside of Germany,
>> if you do not LIVE in Germany.
>
> Bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Fredrick_T%C3%B6ben
cu
59cobalt
--
"If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of
their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution."
--Mark Russinovich
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Fredrick_T%C3%B6ben
Very good, while a bit drastic example.
Cheers,
Jens