Outpost v. Windows?

I have been with Outpost Pro for a couple of years and is time for re-newal.
I am considering dropping them and using my Windows FW on my XP w/
broadband. The last time I re-newed it turned into a 2 week ordeal before it
was installed and running correctly. I still have conflicts with updates,
upgrades, etc. supplied by other software when they are located by O/post at
boot. Are there any solid benefits of O/post over Win. that are worth the
$'s each year that I'm not aware of? Thanx

Re: Outpost v. Windows?

lib wrote:
> Are there any solid benefits of O/post over Win. that are worth the
> $'s each year that I'm not aware of?

No.

cu
59cobalt
--
"If a software developer ever believes a rootkit is a necessary part of
their architecture they should go back and re-architect their solution."
--Mark Russinovich

Re: Outpost v. Windows?

"lib" wrote in message
news:471ccc8f$0$3373$baae4c71@news.mindlink.net...
>I have been with Outpost Pro for a couple of years and is time for
>re-newal. I am considering dropping them and using my Windows FW on my XP
>w/ broadband. The last time I re-newed it turned into a 2 week ordeal
>before it was installed and running correctly. I still have conflicts with
>updates, upgrades, etc. supplied by other software when they are located by
>O/post at boot. Are there any solid benefits of O/post over Win. that are
>worth the $'s each year that I'm not aware of? Thanx
>

If using XP FW, just use these other tools and look around from time to time
yourself.