New Proxy - http://techlock.info

I just created a new proxy and thought should share it with you guys.

http://www.techlock.info

Share the word and enjoy!!

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In message <1193409182.913942.255020@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
at 07:33:02 on Fri, 26 Oct 2007, rahul_sharma6330@yahoo.com wrote
>I just created a new proxy and thought should share it with you guys.
>
>
>Share the word and enjoy!!
>
Please advise me how to configure firefox to use your proxy
--
Mike News

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

"Mike" wrote in message
news:04RMs7AAriIHFwjw@turnpike.home...
> In message <1193409182.913942.255020@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
> at 07:33:02 on Fri, 26 Oct 2007, rahul_sharma6330@yahoo.com wrote
>>I just created a new proxy and thought should share it with you guys.
>>
>>
>>Share the word and enjoy!!
>>
> Please advise me how to configure firefox to use your proxy

There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
of stuff on the Web. I often get complaints
about Live 365, my streaming provider, being
incomptable with Firefox, and listeners not
too happy about having to go IE.

Dump Firefox and go to IE, and you will have
no more trouble.

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

"Chilly8" wrote in message
news:ffu1h1$n2j$1@aioe.org...
>
> "Mike" wrote in message
> news:04RMs7AAriIHFwjw@turnpike.home...
>> In message <1193409182.913942.255020@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
>> at 07:33:02 on Fri, 26 Oct 2007, rahul_sharma6330@yahoo.com wrote
>>>I just created a new proxy and thought should share it with you guys.
>>>
>>>
>>>Share the word and enjoy!!
>>>
>> Please advise me how to configure firefox to use your proxy
>
> There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
> IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
> of stuff on the Web. I often get complaints
> about Live 365, my streaming provider, being
> incomptable with Firefox, and listeners not
> too happy about having to go IE.
>
> Dump Firefox and go to IE, and you will have
> no more trouble.
>
>
>
Yes dumb IE so you won't get fucked

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In message
at 17:12:08 on Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Chilly8 wrote
>There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
>IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
>of stuff on the Web. I often get complaints
>about Live 365, my streaming provider, being
>incomptable with Firefox, and listeners not
>too happy about having to go IE.
>
>Dump Firefox and go to IE, and you will have
>no more trouble.
>
I find firefox works fine with virtually all sites we use - and we do
visit a lot here. Usually it's just a formatting error or suchlike.

Does this mean your proxies don't work with Firefox?
--
Mike News

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Chilly8 wrote:

> Dump Firefox and go to IE, and you will have
> no more trouble.

Yeah right - get a Ford Model 'T' as well.

Jim Ford

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Chilly8 wrote:
> "Mike" wrote in message
> news:04RMs7AAriIHFwjw@turnpike.home...
>> In message <1193409182.913942.255020@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
>> at 07:33:02 on Fri, 26 Oct 2007, rahul_sharma6330@yahoo.com wrote
>>> I just created a new proxy and thought should share it with you guys.
>>>
>>>
>>> Share the word and enjoy!!
>>>
>> Please advise me how to configure firefox to use your proxy
>
> There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
> IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
> of stuff on the Web. I often get complaints
> about Live 365, my streaming provider, being
> incomptable with Firefox, and listeners not
> too happy about having to go IE.
>
> Dump Firefox and go to IE, and you will have
> no more trouble.
>
>
>
IDIOT

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
> IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
> of stuff on the Web.

No, it's great for people that want to be able to surf more securely
than using a broken IE. IE should only be used when a site won't work
using ANY other browser.

Not only do you advocate breaking laws and company policy, you now stoop
to advocating using a method which can easily get a persons computer
hacked - which means that their company will be vulnerable to things
because of your advice.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

"Leythos" wrote in message
news:MPG.218d0c374dcbfa2e989713@adfree.Usenet.com...
> In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
>> There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
>> IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
>> of stuff on the Web.
>
> No, it's great for people that want to be able to surf more securely
> than using a broken IE. IE should only be used when a site won't work
> using ANY other browser.
>
> Not only do you advocate breaking laws

It is NOT againast the law to access my radio station from
ANYWHERE, including from work, as long as you do
NOT break someone's PASSWORD to do so. That is why
I put the Live 365 server assigned to me, in my
RDNS list, so the filters will see MY domain, instead
of live365.com. I do this one the nameserver I have on
my server. Since I am PAYING Live 365 for the right
to use their network, it is LEGAL for me put the
server currently assigned to me in my RDNS list,
and cause reverse lookups to show my domain,
insted of Live365.com. What I am doing to spoof
filtering programs, such as Websense, Bess, Sentian,
etc, does NOT violate ANY law of ANY country.

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In message
at 09:50:33 on Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Leythos wrote
> IE should only be used when a site won't work
>using ANY other browser.
>
For sites that work in IE only, are there any advantages in updating to
IE7? My new build keeps suggesting I should upgrade to it, but I can't
make my mind up whether to add it the "permanently don't ask me again"
option in Windows Update or not. Having upgraded Windows Media Player
to version 11 and discovered I can't back up my license files (for legit
reasons) then I am going to be backup with version 9 in it (although I
would prefer v10 if that doesn't do the same)
--
Mike News

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
>
> "Leythos" wrote in message
> news:MPG.218d0c374dcbfa2e989713@adfree.Usenet.com...
> > In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> >> There is an easier way, dump Firefox and use
> >> IE. Firefox is SOOO incomptable with a lot
> >> of stuff on the Web.
> >
> > No, it's great for people that want to be able to surf more securely
> > than using a broken IE. IE should only be used when a site won't work
> > using ANY other browser.
> >
> > Not only do you advocate breaking laws
>
> It is NOT againast the law to access my radio station from
> ANYWHERE, including from work, as long as you do
> NOT break someone's PASSWORD to do so. That is why
> I put the Live 365 server assigned to me, in my
> RDNS list, so the filters will see MY domain, instead
> of live365.com. I do this one the nameserver I have on
> my server. Since I am PAYING Live 365 for the right
> to use their network, it is LEGAL for me put the
> server currently assigned to me in my RDNS list,
> and cause reverse lookups to show my domain,
> insted of Live365.com. What I am doing to spoof
> filtering programs, such as Websense, Bess, Sentian,
> etc, does NOT violate ANY law of ANY country.

Violating the work contract could be against the law in many locations
around the world.

Violating company policy is always something that can get you fired.

You advocating the violation of laws that you don't know about, and
advocating breaking company policy in a manner that could compromise a
company network could leave you personally liable.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article ,
turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHIS says...
> In message
> at 09:50:33 on Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Leythos wrote
> > IE should only be used when a site won't work
> >using ANY other browser.
> >
> For sites that work in IE only, are there any advantages in updating to
> IE7? My new build keeps suggesting I should upgrade to it, but I can't
> make my mind up whether to add it the "permanently don't ask me again"
> option in Windows Update or not. Having upgraded Windows Media Player
> to version 11 and discovered I can't back up my license files (for legit
> reasons) then I am going to be backup with version 9 in it (although I
> would prefer v10 if that doesn't do the same)

I personally, having worked with computers for more than 30 years,
designing secure networks that have not been compromised yet, believe
that using IE (any version) should be limited to sites that you can
specifically trust and know to trust. All other sites should be visited
by using a non-IE browser, with all extensions and helpers removed.

Personally I don't even use Flash in my FireFox - if the site needs it I
just look somewhere else - From my DMZ network I have computers with IE
and FireFox and Opera and even other machines running Linux with
extensions for testing.

IT 7 is suppose to be better than IE6 for security, but it also brings
in a few complications, but it is "suppose" to be better - it does have
exploit paths, but you should be updating nightly.

Use FireFox as your primary browser then IE for sites you know you can
trust (Banks).

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Leythos wrote:
> In article ,
> turnpike_user@turnpike_REMOVEuser.THIScomANDTHIS says...
>> In message
>> at 09:50:33 on Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Leythos wrote
>>> IE should only be used when a site won't work
>>> using ANY other browser.
>> >
>> For sites that work in IE only, are there any advantages in updating to
>> IE7? My new build keeps suggesting I should upgrade to it, but I can't
>> make my mind up whether to add it the "permanently don't ask me again"
>> option in Windows Update or not. Having upgraded Windows Media Player
>> to version 11 and discovered I can't back up my license files (for legit
>> reasons) then I am going to be backup with version 9 in it (although I
>> would prefer v10 if that doesn't do the same)
>
> I personally, having worked with computers for more than 30 years,
> designing secure networks that have not been compromised yet, believe
> that using IE (any version) should be limited to sites that you can
> specifically trust and know to trust. All other sites should be visited
> by using a non-IE browser, with all extensions and helpers removed.


i wholeheartdly agree and i would even say
IE is only allowed on inhouse sites and even if that's the case i
would urge the web application devs to comply to the standards ASAP

> Personally I don't even use Flash in my FireFox - if the site needs it I
> just look somewhere else - From my DMZ network I have computers with IE
> and FireFox and Opera and even other machines running Linux with
> extensions for testing.
>
> IT 7 is suppose to be better than IE6 for security, but it also brings
> in a few complications, but it is "suppose" to be better - it does have
> exploit paths, but you should be updating nightly.
>

keeping your system up to date is one of the most important rules
of computer security and yes IE 7.0 is better than IE 6.0

> Use FireFox as your primary browser then IE for sites you know you can
> trust (Banks).
>

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article <472366c5$0$22304$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
> i wholeheartdly agree and i would even say
> IE is only allowed on inhouse sites and even if that's the case i
> would urge the web application devs to comply to the standards ASAP

Yea, that would be nice, but so many development teams go the EASY way
and build apps that only work with IE - like document imaging systems
and others. It's a PITA when you tell people that they should only use
IE for the medical apps and banking sites and to use FireFox for
everything else.

Lucky for us we can remove Activ-X and attachments from HTTP sessions
and email sessions so that users are not exposed to malware through IE
at the firewall.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> ALL I am doing is a simple RDNS hack

You're a fool and I'm just waiting to read about you in the news, being
hauled away for advocating hacks and violations of laws and company
networks. Better yet, when an employee sues you for your information
being wrong and them being fired because you said it was undetectable -
which everyone in security and networking knows is a lie.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Leythos wrote:
> In article <472366c5$0$22304$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
> DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
>> i wholeheartdly agree and i would even say
>> IE is only allowed on inhouse sites and even if that's the case i
>> would urge the web application devs to comply to the standards ASAP
>
> Yea, that would be nice, but so many development teams go the EASY way
> and build apps that only work with IE - like document imaging systems
> and others. It's a PITA when you tell people that they should only use
> IE for the medical apps and banking sites and to use FireFox for
> everything else.
>
> Lucky for us we can remove Activ-X and attachments from HTTP sessions
> and email sessions so that users are not exposed to malware through IE
> at the firewall.
>
how does one do that ?
using proxy servers (squid)?
i know of spamassin and clamav,avg for mail servers but i'm interested in
removing activeX shit

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In message <472366c5$0$22304$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>
at 18:26:45 on Sat, 27 Oct 2007, goarilla <"kevin DOT paulus AT skynet
DOT be"@?.?.invalid> wrote
>keeping your system up to date is one of the most important rules
>of computer security and yes IE 7.0 is better than IE 6.0
>
Since MS are continuing to issue security updates to IE 6, I thank you
for your input. So long as the settings I have set via gpedit.msc don't
get compromised, then I'll be happy to upgrade

Sorry for being a bit off topic
--
Mike News

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article <47237f7d$0$22306$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <472366c5$0$22304$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
> > DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
> >> i wholeheartdly agree and i would even say
> >> IE is only allowed on inhouse sites and even if that's the case i
> >> would urge the web application devs to comply to the standards ASAP
> >
> > Yea, that would be nice, but so many development teams go the EASY way
> > and build apps that only work with IE - like document imaging systems
> > and others. It's a PITA when you tell people that they should only use
> > IE for the medical apps and banking sites and to use FireFox for
> > everything else.
> >
> > Lucky for us we can remove Activ-X and attachments from HTTP sessions
> > and email sessions so that users are not exposed to malware through IE
> > at the firewall.
> >
> how does one do that ?
> using proxy servers (squid)?
> i know of spamassin and clamav,avg for mail servers but i'm interested in
> removing activeX shit

Our firewalls, in fact, most firewall appliances, and I'm not talking
those crappy NAT Routers, I'm talking about real firewall appliances,
have a number of Proxy service rules that allow things like this - for
instance I can block Active-X, Scripting, downloads of EXE, ZIP, COM,
DLL, etc... while still allowing PDF (as an example)....

Same for SMTP where you filter attachments, headers, messages > x size,
etc....

I use WatchGuard X Core firewalls for 90% of our clients.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Leythos wrote:
> In article <47237f7d$0$22306$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
> DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
>> Leythos wrote:
>>> In article <472366c5$0$22304$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
>>> DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
>>>> i wholeheartdly agree and i would even say
>>>> IE is only allowed on inhouse sites and even if that's the case i
>>>> would urge the web application devs to comply to the standards ASAP
>>> Yea, that would be nice, but so many development teams go the EASY way
>>> and build apps that only work with IE - like document imaging systems
>>> and others. It's a PITA when you tell people that they should only use
>>> IE for the medical apps and banking sites and to use FireFox for
>>> everything else.
>>>
>>> Lucky for us we can remove Activ-X and attachments from HTTP sessions
>>> and email sessions so that users are not exposed to malware through IE
>>> at the firewall.
>>>
>> how does one do that ?
>> using proxy servers (squid)?
>> i know of spamassin and clamav,avg for mail servers but i'm interested in
>> removing activeX shit
>
> Our firewalls, in fact, most firewall appliances, and I'm not talking
> those crappy NAT Routers, I'm talking about real firewall appliances,
> have a number of Proxy service rules that allow things like this - for
> instance I can block Active-X, Scripting, downloads of EXE, ZIP, COM,
> DLL, etc... while still allowing PDF (as an example)....
>
> Same for SMTP where you filter attachments, headers, messages > x size,
> etc....
>
> I use WatchGuard X Core firewalls for 90% of our clients.
>
i'll guess i'll have to do some research on my own then i really hope it
can be done on a
dedicated x86 pc Unix box in software

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article <47239d27$0$22306$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
> Leythos wrote:
> > In article <47237f7d$0$22306$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
> > DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
> >> Leythos wrote:
> >>> In article <472366c5$0$22304$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>, goarilla <"kevin
> >>> DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be"> says...
> >>>> i wholeheartdly agree and i would even say
> >>>> IE is only allowed on inhouse sites and even if that's the case i
> >>>> would urge the web application devs to comply to the standards ASAP
> >>> Yea, that would be nice, but so many development teams go the EASY way
> >>> and build apps that only work with IE - like document imaging systems
> >>> and others. It's a PITA when you tell people that they should only use
> >>> IE for the medical apps and banking sites and to use FireFox for
> >>> everything else.
> >>>
> >>> Lucky for us we can remove Activ-X and attachments from HTTP sessions
> >>> and email sessions so that users are not exposed to malware through IE
> >>> at the firewall.
> >>>
> >> how does one do that ?
> >> using proxy servers (squid)?
> >> i know of spamassin and clamav,avg for mail servers but i'm interested in
> >> removing activeX shit
> >
> > Our firewalls, in fact, most firewall appliances, and I'm not talking
> > those crappy NAT Routers, I'm talking about real firewall appliances,
> > have a number of Proxy service rules that allow things like this - for
> > instance I can block Active-X, Scripting, downloads of EXE, ZIP, COM,
> > DLL, etc... while still allowing PDF (as an example)....
> >
> > Same for SMTP where you filter attachments, headers, messages > x size,
> > etc....
> >
> > I use WatchGuard X Core firewalls for 90% of our clients.
> >
> i'll guess i'll have to do some research on my own then i really hope it
> can be done on a
> dedicated x86 pc Unix box in software

I'm sure it could, but we don't roll systems that are not certified for
clients.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

goarilla wrote:

>> Our firewalls, in fact, most firewall appliances, and I'm not talking
>> those crappy NAT Routers, I'm talking about real firewall appliances,
>> have a number of Proxy service rules that allow things like this - for
>> instance I can block Active-X, Scripting, downloads of EXE, ZIP, COM,
>> DLL, etc... while still allowing PDF (as an example)....
>>
>> Same for SMTP where you filter attachments, headers, messages > x
>> size, etc....
>>
>> I use WatchGuard X Core firewalls for 90% of our clients.
>>
> i'll guess i'll have to do some research on my own then i really hope it
> can be done on a
> dedicated x86 pc Unix box in software

I'm using a 'LEAF' firewall which uses Tom Eastep's 'Shorewall' (which
is a configuration front end for iptables). I'm not sure if it will do
what you want, but the Shorewall docs are very comprehensive and Tom
Eastep gives excellent support. You've aroused my interest - I'll do a
search through the docs when I get a chance!

Jim Ford

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> "Leythos" wrote in message
> news:MPG.218d42c1cfedeb8098971a@adfree.Usenet.com...
> > In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> >> ALL I am doing is a simple RDNS hack
> >
> > You're a fool and I'm just waiting to read about you in the news, being
> > hauled away for advocating hacks and violations of laws and
>
> I use Evidence Eliminator on my equipment, on a regular
> basis. Since I cross international borders quite often, I
> run EE on my disks, especially before attempting to
> bring any of my equipment into Canada, Australia, or
> the United States, where Customs are doing more
> forensic examination of hard disks. This way, anything
> I do know about that could get me in trouble upon
> entering any country is wiped out and cannot be
> recovered by forensic examination tools.

Why do you have to hide if you're not breaking any laws?

It's now what you "know" since you don't know anything, it's what you
tell people and how easy it is for them to sue you for your advocating
something that can get them fired or arrested.

EE is crap and it's used by the Guilty.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

"Leythos" wrote in message
news:MPG.218e3142b590aed898972b@adfree.Usenet.com...
> In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>
>> "Leythos" wrote in message
>> news:MPG.218d42c1cfedeb8098971a@adfree.Usenet.com...
>> > In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
>> >> ALL I am doing is a simple RDNS hack
>> >
>> > You're a fool and I'm just waiting to read about you in the news, being
>> > hauled away for advocating hacks and violations of laws and
>>
>> I use Evidence Eliminator on my equipment, on a regular
>> basis. Since I cross international borders quite often, I
>> run EE on my disks, especially before attempting to
>> bring any of my equipment into Canada, Australia, or
>> the United States, where Customs are doing more
>> forensic examination of hard disks. This way, anything
>> I do know about that could get me in trouble upon
>> entering any country is wiped out and cannot be
>> recovered by forensic examination tools.
>
> Why do you have to hide if you're not breaking any laws?

Ah, but malware can download things like illegal porn
without your knowledge. Some people HAVE been
arrested for that. People's computers are sometimes
still hijacked to place "repositories" of things like
illegal porn, or pirated movies, music, or software.
So I Ghost my machine and scrub it with EE before
attempting before going through Customs.

EE is not illegal, otherwise they would not be selling
the product.

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Leythos wrote:

>> I use Evidence Eliminator on my equipment, on a regular
>> basis. Since I cross international borders quite often, I
>> run EE on my disks, especially before attempting to
>> bring any of my equipment into Canada, Australia, or
>> the United States, where Customs are doing more
>> forensic examination of hard disks. This way, anything
>> I do know about that could get me in trouble upon
>> entering any country is wiped out and cannot be
>> recovered by forensic examination tools.
>
> Why do you have to hide if you're not breaking any laws?

Whilst I don't feel the need to take any such measures myself, I can see
what he means.

There's information that's in the public domain in the U.S. that's an
Official Secret in the U.K.. U.K. investigative journalists in the U.K.
have had to go the the U.S. to obtain U.K. information that they would
be denied in the U.K. - in fact they could go to jail for being in
possession of it in the U.K.! In spite of our so called 'Freedom of
Information' act, the U.K. is still obsessively secretive regarding what
is officialdom considers 'sensitive' information.

Jim Ford

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
>
> "Leythos" wrote in message
> news:MPG.218e3142b590aed898972b@adfree.Usenet.com...
> > In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> >> X-No-Archive: Yes
> >>
> >> "Leythos" wrote in message
> >> news:MPG.218d42c1cfedeb8098971a@adfree.Usenet.com...
> >> > In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> >> >> ALL I am doing is a simple RDNS hack
> >> >
> >> > You're a fool and I'm just waiting to read about you in the news, being
> >> > hauled away for advocating hacks and violations of laws and
> >>
> >> I use Evidence Eliminator on my equipment, on a regular
> >> basis. Since I cross international borders quite often, I
> >> run EE on my disks, especially before attempting to
> >> bring any of my equipment into Canada, Australia, or
> >> the United States, where Customs are doing more
> >> forensic examination of hard disks. This way, anything
> >> I do know about that could get me in trouble upon
> >> entering any country is wiped out and cannot be
> >> recovered by forensic examination tools.
> >
> > Why do you have to hide if you're not breaking any laws?
>
> Ah, but malware can download things like illegal porn
> without your knowledge. Some people HAVE been
> arrested for that. People's computers are sometimes
> still hijacked to place "repositories" of things like
> illegal porn, or pirated movies, music, or software.
> So I Ghost my machine and scrub it with EE before
> attempting before going through Customs.
>
> EE is not illegal, otherwise they would not be selling
> the product.

You confuse EE being not illegal with people that use it to hide their
illegal actions - and in some places using tools like EE is a violation
of the law and company policy.

So, again, you are using EE to cover your tracks and you still don't
know anything about network security or the laws of most countries and
you still advocate things that can get people fired and that leaves you
open to personal liability for your actions.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article ,
jaford@watford53.freeserve.co.uk says...
> Leythos wrote:
>
> >> I use Evidence Eliminator on my equipment, on a regular
> >> basis. Since I cross international borders quite often, I
> >> run EE on my disks, especially before attempting to
> >> bring any of my equipment into Canada, Australia, or
> >> the United States, where Customs are doing more
> >> forensic examination of hard disks. This way, anything
> >> I do know about that could get me in trouble upon
> >> entering any country is wiped out and cannot be
> >> recovered by forensic examination tools.
> >
> > Why do you have to hide if you're not breaking any laws?
>
> Whilst I don't feel the need to take any such measures myself, I can see
> what he means.
>
> There's information that's in the public domain in the U.S. that's an
> Official Secret in the U.K.. U.K. investigative journalists in the U.K.
> have had to go the the U.S. to obtain U.K. information that they would
> be denied in the U.K. - in fact they could go to jail for being in
> possession of it in the U.K.! In spite of our so called 'Freedom of
> Information' act, the U.K. is still obsessively secretive regarding what
> is officialdom considers 'sensitive' information.

Then they don't need EE to erase their tacks...

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> When I go through Customs at SFO,
> my hard disks will have been scrubbed with EE
> using the maximum level of destruction.

And yet, in all my travels, I've never had a problem and never had to
"Erase" my tracks for what I do.

Maybe if you knew more about how to secure a network and your system you
would not have to worry about what you do being exposed and causing you
problems.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

* Chilly8 :
> I use Evidence Eliminator on my equipment, on a regular
> basis. Since I cross international borders quite often, I
> run EE on my disks, especially before attempting to
> bring any of my equipment into Canada, Australia, or
> the United States, where Customs are doing more
> forensic examination of hard disks. This way, anything
> I do know about that could get me in trouble upon
> entering any country is wiped out and cannot be
> recovered by forensic examination tools.
>
>

Well that should end all doubts about Chilly8 folks, he uses EE and
trusts it.

Jason

Re: New Proxy - http://techlock.info

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)