Missing many HTML properties in design time

Missing many HTML properties in design time

am 30.10.2007 23:47:58 von GD

There is a big difference between my VS.net 2005 team edition and my
co-workers'. We all installed VS.Net 2005 SP1. However, in my IDE, the table
cells in the web project are missing about 40% properties. For example, the
frequently used "nowrap" property is missing.

In addition, I have noticed that my web project (using C#) solutions don't
have "References" folder. When I add any references, they go to "bin"
directory. Although is works, I personaly like to add reference dlls and
projects to "Reference".

Any ideas?

GD

Re: Missing many HTML properties in design time

am 31.10.2007 08:41:10 von Marc Gravell

The second half sounds like the difference between "web site" and "web
application project" mode. Does your code currently have a csproj? If
not (i.e. it mounts directly to the folder) then it is "web site". The
"web application project" mode is available in SP1 (or pre-SP1 as a
separate download).

Marc

Re: Missing many HTML properties in design time

am 31.10.2007 16:00:49 von GD

Marc,

Thanks for your answer. I wonder what the whole purpose that VS is designed
to have both web site and web app features.

Many HTML properies are missing in both web site and web app project in my
VS 2005 team edition.

GD


"Marc Gravell" wrote in message
news:ePxuSE5GIHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> The second half sounds like the difference between "web site" and "web
> application project" mode. Does your code currently have a csproj? If not
> (i.e. it mounts directly to the folder) then it is "web site". The "web
> application project" mode is available in SP1 (or pre-SP1 as a separate
> download).
>
> Marc
>

Re: Missing many HTML properties in design time

am 31.10.2007 16:13:38 von Marc Gravell

> I wonder what the whole purpose that VS is designed to have both web
> site and web app features.

Basically, VS 2005 shipped with just the web-site mode; there was a
list of reasons why this was considered a good idead, but people
didn't really get along with it much. Web Application Project usage
was re-introduced, making it more like how 2003 used to work. From my
experience, it is also a *lot* easier to work with, with builds taking
a second or two rather than (quite literally) minutes.

Marc

Re: Missing many HTML properties in design time

am 31.10.2007 17:38:13 von GD

I am supprised to know that building web-site is much faster than Web
Application Project.

Thanks.

GD

"Marc Gravell" wrote in message
news:u5zaZB9GIHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> I wonder what the whole purpose that VS is designed to have both web site
>> and web app features.
>
> Basically, VS 2005 shipped with just the web-site mode; there was a list
> of reasons why this was considered a good idead, but people didn't really
> get along with it much. Web Application Project usage was re-introduced,
> making it more like how 2003 used to work. From my experience, it is also
> a *lot* easier to work with, with builds taking a second or two rather
> than (quite literally) minutes.
>
> Marc
>

Re: Missing many HTML properties in design time

am 31.10.2007 18:10:10 von GD

Sorry, building Web Application Projects is much faster than web-sites. Web
Application mode is the winne!

GD

"GD" wrote in message
news:O$BgCx9GIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I am supprised to know that building web-site is much faster than Web
>Application Project.
>
> Thanks.
>
> GD
>
> "Marc Gravell" wrote in message
> news:u5zaZB9GIHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> I wonder what the whole purpose that VS is designed to have both web
>>> site and web app features.
>>
>> Basically, VS 2005 shipped with just the web-site mode; there was a list
>> of reasons why this was considered a good idead, but people didn't really
>> get along with it much. Web Application Project usage was re-introduced,
>> making it more like how 2003 used to work. From my experience, it is also
>> a *lot* easier to work with, with builds taking a second or two rather
>> than (quite literally) minutes.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>
>