(weird as it may
sound) and validates correctly!
Thanks again dude!
code change:
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 08.11.2007 22:21:03 von Nik Coughlin
SM wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Do you need that div at all?
And while you're at it you could be pedantic and say that the thumbnails are
a list as well:
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 08.11.2007 23:09:43 von dorayme
In article
<1194546107.988576.42520@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
SM wrote:
> This is a sample of the code. Notice the insertion of the gallery
> beneath the selected by the user.
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .....
>
> Is this good code?
>
Not really, you can't do this. This is better and you can
probably improve further:
http://tinyurl.com/27yrkx
--
dorayme
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 09.11.2007 02:10:13 von dorayme
In article <47337daf$1@clear.net.nz>,
"Nik Coughlin" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This is not really correct because the idea is that the
thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.
> And while you're at it you could be pedantic and say that the thumbnails are
> a list as well:
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
dorayme
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 09.11.2007 03:32:35 von Adrienne Boswell
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed SM
writing in news:1194556111.076808.276700@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
>
> Thanks again dude!
>
>
That would be Dudette!
--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 09.11.2007 08:59:47 von Els
dorayme wrote:
> In article <47337daf$1@clear.net.nz>,
> "Nik Coughlin" wrote:
>
[snip]
> This is not really correct because the idea is that the
> thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
> alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.
[snip example where the nested ul is inside the list element
*following* the Tribute list element]
I'll be pedantic then ;-), and say it is not correct. If the
thumbnails are indeed an expansion of the item Tribute, the list would
look like this:
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 09.11.2007 09:38:25 von dorayme
In article <1qr3hbl0xduir$.dew6rcfkfsqr.dlg@40tude.net>,
Els wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
>
> > In article <47337daf$1@clear.net.nz>,
> > "Nik Coughlin" wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > This is not really correct because the idea is that the
> > thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
> > alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.
>
> [snip example where the nested ul is inside the list element
> *following* the Tribute list element]
>
> I'll be pedantic then ;-), and say it is not correct. If the
> thumbnails are indeed an expansion of the item Tribute, the list would
> look like this:
>
>
>
>
>
That will teach me to be so soft-hearted and trusting! I had just
posted at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/27yrkx
what I thought was a *more* correct plan than the OP
and assumed without looking closely that Nick was following this
general idea.
--
dorayme
Re: Is this good code? Good practice advice needed...
am 12.11.2007 04:39:11 von SM
On Nov 9, 3:38 am, dorayme wrote:
> In article <1qr3hbl0xduir$.dew6rcfkfsqr....@40tude.net>,
>
>
>
> Els wrote:
> > dorayme wrote:
>
> > > In article <47337da...@clear.net.nz>,
> > > "Nik Coughlin" wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> > > This is not really correct because the idea is that the
> > > thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
> > > alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.
>
> > [snip example where the nested ul is inside the list element
> > *following* the Tribute list element]
>
> > I'll be pedantic then ;-), and say it is not correct. If the
> > thumbnails are indeed an expansion of the item Tribute, the list would
> > look like this:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> That will teach me to be so soft-hearted and trusting! I had just
> posted at the time:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/27yrkx
>
> what I thought was a *more* correct plan than the OP
>
> and assumed without looking closely that Nick was following this
> general idea.
>
> --
> dorayme
Thank girls and guys!
Everything makes sense now....