Re: Just how demented is LinTard Land anyhow?

Re: Just how demented is LinTard Land anyhow?

am 14.11.2007 05:32:46 von NoSpamMgbworld

You are posting to a .NET group (amongst others). Just shut up!

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

*************************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*************************************************
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote in message
news:taq_i.13918$xa2.12940@read2.cgocable.net...
> Ahahahaha.. Lets see if I get this Demented Lintard reasoning right.
>
> Vista is a failure becuase after 300 days after it's release, it only has
> 7.5% of the OS market while the Lintard OS, is a shashing success because
> after 18 years after being released it has less than 2% (and falling) of
> the
> OS market.
>
> In Lintard Land, left is right, and up is down. Big is small and black
> is
> white.
>
> And that my little children is why Lintards will be capable of
> producing viable software.
>
>
>

Re: Just how demented is LinTard Land anyhow?

am 15.11.2007 01:41:31 von DanS

"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote in
news:Y4I_i.14199$xa2.13519@read2.cgocable.net:

>
> "Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" wrote
>> You are posting to a .NET group (amongst others). Just shut up!
>
> If only a real development environment like .NET

Now THAT is a joke.

All that .Net accomplishes is allowing bad programmers to write bad code
faster.

I know, let's add ANOTHER layer of libraries to go through before we get to
the real system calls, since hardware advances have brought the prices
down, noone will even notice........until you go from XP to Vista that is.

..Net is meant for network/internet-based applications and that's where it
should stay. It should not be used for any locally running applications, or
utilities....like HP printer utilities come to mind.

Re: Just how demented is LinTard Land anyhow?

am 15.11.2007 02:13:26 von The Ghost In The Machine

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, HangEveryRepubliKKKan

wrote
on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:46:59 -0800
:
>
> "DanS"
>> .Net is meant for network/internet-based applications and that's where it
>> should stay.
>
> But java is intended to be run anywhere.
>
> Ahahahahahahahahaha......
>

And that is exactly Java's problem. Because it is intended
to be run everywhere, users thereof cannot be locked into
a single platform and forced to pay royalties.

Clearly, Sun wasn't thinking during Java's original
development!

:-)

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Been there, done that, didn't get the T-shirt.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com