Re: Kompozer Vs SeaMonkey

1001 Webs skrev:
> I'm trying to choose between Kompozer and SeaMonkey, both free, both
> WYSIWYG, both multiplatform.
>
> Kompozer:
> http://www.kompozer.net/
> Looks fine, with site manager and FTP included.
> The one thing I don't like about Kompozer is that reformats the source
> code when you open a file. It kind of soft-wraps the lines in a most
> weird manner.
> You can use the HandCoder plugin, but that's not the idea. Or maybe it
> is, not sure ...
> Another issue that worries me is that it hasn't been updated for over
> a year and the bug reports page is overcrowded:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=170132&atid=853122
>

Wrong.
Version 0.7.10 was released 2007-08-30. It's in development active.
The reformat issue is a legacy from NVU and can not be fixed in this
program at all. Use Tidy.

Check the Forum: http://wysifauthoring.informe.com/

Original author of NVU, Daniel Glazman, is working on "Composer", who
will not the reformat issue.


> SeaMonkey:
> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
> Looks good enough, frequently updated and lots of extensions-plugins.
> Has anyone done any real work with it?
>

The Composer in SeaMonkey (and the Mozilla Suite before that) is the
foundation for the later NVU, Kompozer, and "Composer".

I don't think this module is the one that is being worked on the most...


> I did like Bluefish a lot although it isn't WYSIWYG ( What You See Is
> What You Need )
> http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/features.html
> But it only runs on Linux.

Re: Kompozer Vs SeaMonkey

["Followup-To:" header set to alt.www.webmaster.]
On 2007-12-07, Petersen, Vegard Krog wrote:

> The Composer in SeaMonkey (and the Mozilla Suite before that) is the
> foundation for the later NVU, Kompozer, and "Composer".
>
> I don't think this module is the one that is being worked on the most...

Does anyone else have a cross-platform editor that they like then? I installed
SeaMonkey and didn't see anything useful that I didn't already have with
Kompozer. I don't like the reformatting, either.



--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol

Re: Kompozer Vs SeaMonkey

1001 Webs wrote:
> On Dec 7, 3:18 am, "Petersen, Vegard Krog"
> wrote:
>> 1001 Websskrev:
>>
>>> I'm trying to choose between Kompozer and SeaMonkey, both free, both
>>> WYSIWYG, both multiplatform.
>>> Kompozer:
>>> http://www.kompozer.net/
>>> Looks fine, with site manager and FTP included.
>>> The one thing I don't like about Kompozer is that reformats the source
>>> code when you open a file. It kind of soft-wraps the lines in a most
>>> weird manner.
>>> You can use the HandCoder plugin, but that's not the idea. Or maybe it
>>> is, not sure ...
>>> Another issue that worries me is that it hasn't been updated for over
>>> a year and the bug reports page is overcrowded:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=170132&atid=853122
>> Wrong.
>> Version 0.7.10 was released 2007-08-30. It's in development active.
>> The reformat issue is a legacy from NVU and can not be fixed in this
>> program at all. Use Tidy.
>>
>> Check the Forum:http://wysifauthoring.informe.com/
>>
>> Original author of NVU, Daniel Glazman, is working on "Composer", who
>> will not the reformat issue.
>>
>>> SeaMonkey:
>>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
>>> Looks good enough, frequently updated and lots of extensions-plugins.
>>> Has anyone done any real work with it?
>> The Composer in SeaMonkey (and the Mozilla Suite before that) is the
>> foundation for the later NVU, Kompozer, and "Composer".
> What's the difference between Kompozer, and "Composer"?

Composer is a component of the the Netscape Suite, the Mozilla Suite,
and the SeaMonkey Suite. That is the chronology of
development/evolution. The only one actively in development is now
SeaMonkey. However, I don't know how much, if any, dev work is being
done on Composer.

When Mozilla.Org dropped development of the Mozilla Suite, Daniel
Glazman started a project to build a stand-alone Composer and called it
Nvu. Apparently the Nvu project is now dead.

Kompozer is built on the same underlying rendering engine as Composer
and Nvu. The main difference is that Kompozer is in active development.

Use Kompozer as it's the most advanced of the three.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
Better living through denial.

Re: Kompozer Vs SeaMonkey

Ed Mullen wrote in <-cidneWwJ__RLMTanZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@comcast.com>:

>Composer is a component of the the Netscape Suite, the Mozilla Suite,
>and the SeaMonkey Suite. That is the chronology of
>development/evolution. The only one actively in development is now
>SeaMonkey. However, I don't know how much, if any, dev work is being
>done on Composer.
>
>When Mozilla.Org dropped development of the Mozilla Suite, Daniel
>Glazman started a project to build a stand-alone Composer and called it
>Nvu. Apparently the Nvu project is now dead.
>
>Kompozer is built on the same underlying rendering engine as Composer
>and Nvu. The main difference is that Kompozer is in active development.
>
>Use Kompozer as it's the most advanced of the three.

How does http://www.pagebreeze.com/ compare to Kompozer and SeaMonkey,
anyone here tried it and formed an opinion? Just curios.

All the best,
Bjorn S.