Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...

> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't shown
> how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.



Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
client-side language such as javascript.

cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.



hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean 'redirect',
yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here" should somehow be
taken in harmony with:



Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.



what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"? i
mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i quote
you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post. guess what,
kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.

as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that case
ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign, YOU
claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply reject
your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand knowlege to
the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof to the
contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no supporing
evidence.

again, you only see things with half-logic. yes, someone should provide
proof. that someone is you. anyway, i don't care what you think. and, i'm
obviously having fun showing you to be mentally deficit and
dishonest...having waited a few days to see if you'd dropped the whole
matter. i suppose your recent entanglements with mad-hatter kept you busy
enough. it was soooo sad to see that even a novice like OMH could articulate
better reasoning for a solution (that others conferred was better than
yours) than you could. what was it? oh yeah, to cut down on spam piping
through your servers, you suggest blocking an entire range of ip
addresses...failing to note that spam is a hit-once-move-on, covert
activity. yeah, a static solution to a dynamic problem...THAT hits the spot.
:)

hell, in this thread you already behave like OMH...now you're even letting
him get the better of you in giving the most reasonable and logical
solutions to problems. i wish they had a cure for your alzheimers, the old
jerry was pretty good at this whole php thing.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
>> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't shown
>> how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.
>
>
>
> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
> client-side language such as javascript.
>
> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>
>
>
> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean 'redirect',
> yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here" should somehow be
> taken in harmony with:
>
>
>
> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>
>
>
> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"? i
> mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i quote
> you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post. guess what,
> kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>

You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't
be done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.

Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
could do the redirect.

You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.

> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
> everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that case
> ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign, YOU
> claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply reject
> your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand knowlege to
> the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof to the
> contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no supporing
> evidence.
>

You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.

And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
But you can't, loser.

I'm just rejecting your claim that you're a programmer. You've more
stupidity in these forums than any *real* programmer would. You're
probably just a 14 year old script kiddie. At least that's the level of
understanding you show.

> again, you only see things with half-logic. yes, someone should provide
> proof. that someone is you. anyway, i don't care what you think. and, i'm
> obviously having fun showing you to be mentally deficit and
> dishonest...having waited a few days to see if you'd dropped the whole
> matter. i suppose your recent entanglements with mad-hatter kept you busy
> enough. it was soooo sad to see that even a novice like OMH could articulate
> better reasoning for a solution (that others conferred was better than
> yours) than you could. what was it? oh yeah, to cut down on spam piping
> through your servers, you suggest blocking an entire range of ip
> addresses...failing to note that spam is a hit-once-move-on, covert
> activity. yeah, a static solution to a dynamic problem...THAT hits the spot.
> :)
>

Yep, you claim you're a programmer. Prove it. I reject your claim.

But you can't. That's why you need to try to remain anonymous. You're
deathly afraid someone will find out the truth.

> hell, in this thread you already behave like OMH...now you're even letting
> him get the better of you in giving the most reasonable and logical
> solutions to problems. i wish they had a cure for your alzheimers, the old
> jerry was pretty good at this whole php thing.
>
>
>

ROFLMAO! You wouldn't know logic if it bit you in the ass.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
>>> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't
>>> shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.
>>
>>
>>
>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>
>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>
>>
>>
>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>
>>
>>
>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>
>>
>>
>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"?
>> i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i
>> quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post.
>> guess what, kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>>
>
> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't be
> done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>
> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
> could do the redirect.

you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.

> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.

nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results. you
need help with *your* reading.

>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
>> everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that
>> case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign,
>> YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply
>> reject your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand
>> knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof
>> to the contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no
>> supporing evidence.
>>
>
> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.

really? lol.

> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
> But you can't, loser.

idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i and
my employers know otherwise.

> I'm just rejecting your claim that you're a programmer.

lol. yours was the initial posit. my rejection of your claim was not a claim
in itself...just rejection...which i know you get a lot of.



sorry, did you say something?

> ROFLMAO! You wouldn't know logic if it bit you in the ass.

funny, that's where you keep yours stored. :)

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>
>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
>>>> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't
>>>> shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.
>>>
>>>
>>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
>>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
>>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>>
>>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
>>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"?
>>> i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i
>>> quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post.
>>> guess what, kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>>>
>> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't be
>> done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>>
>> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
>> could do the redirect.
>
> you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.
>

Read again, stoopid. I said no such thing.

>> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.
>
> nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results. you
> need help with *your* reading.
>

No, you claimed PHP could do redirects. Now you're backpedaling.

Keep it up, stoopid troll.

>>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
>>> everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that
>>> case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign,
>>> YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply
>>> reject your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand
>>> knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof
>>> to the contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no
>>> supporing evidence.
>>>
>> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.
>
> really? lol.
>
>> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
>> But you can't, loser.
>
> idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i and
> my employers know otherwise.
>

Yea, right. You claim you are a programmer. I challenged your claim.
Prove it, stoopid.

But you can't - because you aren't.

>> I'm just rejecting your claim that you're a programmer.
>
> lol. yours was the initial posit. my rejection of your claim was not a claim
> in itself...just rejection...which i know you get a lot of.
>
>
>
> sorry, did you say something?
>
>> ROFLMAO! You wouldn't know logic if it bit you in the ass.
>
> funny, that's where you keep yours stored. :)
>
>

Gee, it was so quiet here with the Stevie troll gone.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:V9idnd-ZVKMpzOXanZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>> You're the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still
>>>>> haven't shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me
>>>>> where.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
>>>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
>>>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>>>
>>>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
>>>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>>>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>>>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>>>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you
>>>> here"? i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar
>>>> because i quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole
>>>> damn post. guess what, kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>>>>
>>> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't
>>> be done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>>>
>>> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
>>> could do the redirect.
>>
>> you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.
>>
>
> Read again, stoopid. I said no such thing.


already addressed that with quotes and message id's. can't help that you
can't read.

>>> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.
>>
>> nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results.
>> you need help with *your* reading.
>>
>
> No, you claimed PHP could do redirects. Now you're backpedaling.

nope...read again...then post the claim, i.e. quote me.

> Keep it up, stoopid troll.

yes, do.

>>>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say,
>>>> "hey everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in
>>>> that case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom
>>>> campaign, YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof.
>>>> i simply reject your claim because of lack of proof on your part and
>>>> first-hand knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because
>>>> i have proof to the contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected
>>>> because you have no supporing evidence.
>>>>
>>> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.
>>
>> really? lol.
>>
>>> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
>>> But you can't, loser.
>>
>> idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i
>> and my employers know otherwise.
>>
>
> Yea, right. You claim you are a programmer. I challenged your claim.
> Prove it, stoopid.

already addressed this with quotes and message id's. post my original
'claim', i.e. quote me.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:V9idnd-ZVKMpzOXanZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>>> You're the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still
>>>>>> haven't shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me
>>>>>> where.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
>>>>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
>>>>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>>>>
>>>>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
>>>>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>>>>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>>>>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>>>>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you
>>>>> here"? i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar
>>>>> because i quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole
>>>>> damn post. guess what, kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>>>>>
>>>> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't
>>>> be done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>>>>
>>>> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
>>>> could do the redirect.
>>> you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.
>>>
>> Read again, stoopid. I said no such thing.
>
>
> already addressed that with quotes and message id's. can't help that you
> can't read.
>
>>>> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.
>>> nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results.
>>> you need help with *your* reading.
>>>
>> No, you claimed PHP could do redirects. Now you're backpedaling.
>
> nope...read again...then post the claim, i.e. quote me.
>
>> Keep it up, stoopid troll.
>
> yes, do.
>
>>>>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say,
>>>>> "hey everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in
>>>>> that case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom
>>>>> campaign, YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof.
>>>>> i simply reject your claim because of lack of proof on your part and
>>>>> first-hand knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because
>>>>> i have proof to the contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected
>>>>> because you have no supporing evidence.
>>>>>
>>>> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.
>>> really? lol.
>>>
>>>> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
>>>> But you can't, loser.
>>> idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i
>>> and my employers know otherwise.
>>>
>> Yea, right. You claim you are a programmer. I challenged your claim.
>> Prove it, stoopid.
>
> already addressed this with quotes and message id's. post my original
> 'claim', i.e. quote me.
>
>
>
>

Already have quoted you - multiple times. But you can't read because
you're just a stoopid troll.

Get lost, loser. You boor me.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:HMqdnelQ2PGrcuXanZ2dnUVZ_t_inZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:V9idnd-ZVKMpzOXanZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>>>> You're the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still
>>>>>>> haven't shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show
>>>>>>> me where.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to
>>>>>> process
>>>>>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>>>>>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>>>>>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>>>>>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you
>>>>>> here"? i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar
>>>>>> because i quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole
>>>>>> damn post. guess what, kinda makes you seem like
>>>>>> you're...well...lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't
>>>>> be done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
>>>>> could do the redirect.
>>>> you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.
>>>>
>>> Read again, stoopid. I said no such thing.
>>
>>
>> already addressed that with quotes and message id's. can't help that you
>> can't read.
>>
>>>>> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.
>>>> nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results.
>>>> you need help with *your* reading.
>>>>
>>> No, you claimed PHP could do redirects. Now you're backpedaling.
>>
>> nope...read again...then post the claim, i.e. quote me.
>>
>>> Keep it up, stoopid troll.
>>
>> yes, do.
>>
>>>>>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say,
>>>>>> "hey everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in
>>>>>> that case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom
>>>>>> campaign, YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply
>>>>>> proof. i simply reject your claim because of lack of proof on your
>>>>>> part and first-hand knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're
>>>>>> wrong because i have proof to the contrary or not, your claim is
>>>>>> simply rejected because you have no supporing evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.
>>>> really? lol.
>>>>
>>>>> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
>>>>> But you can't, loser.
>>>> idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i
>>>> and my employers know otherwise.
>>>>
>>> Yea, right. You claim you are a programmer. I challenged your claim.
>>> Prove it, stoopid.
>>
>> already addressed this with quotes and message id's. post my original
>> 'claim', i.e. quote me.
>>
>
> Already have quoted you - multiple times. But you can't read because
> you're just a stoopid troll.

never once. but, you keep thinking that.

> Get lost, loser. You boor me.

all you've got to do, jer, is stop responding. you're a sad, lonely old man.
i suspect i provide you with much of your 'human' interaction. i hope you
can still wipe your own ass.

cheers.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:HMqdnelQ2PGrcuXanZ2dnUVZ_t_inZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:V9idnd-ZVKMpzOXanZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>> news:toudnehNdoqSIe7anZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>>>>> You're the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still
>>>>>>>> haven't shown how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show
>>>>>>>> me where.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to
>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> client-side language such as javascript.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
>>>>>>> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean
>>>>>>> 'redirect', yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here"
>>>>>>> should somehow be taken in harmony with:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you
>>>>>>> here"? i mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar
>>>>>>> because i quote you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole
>>>>>>> damn post. guess what, kinda makes you seem like
>>>>>>> you're...well...lying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't
>>>>>> be done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
>>>>>> could do the redirect.
>>>>> you said it could 'theoretically' be done using curl.
>>>>>
>>>> Read again, stoopid. I said no such thing.
>>>
>>> already addressed that with quotes and message id's. can't help that you
>>> can't read.
>>>
>>>>>> You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.
>>>>> nope, i said he could use just php and html to get the desired results.
>>>>> you need help with *your* reading.
>>>>>
>>>> No, you claimed PHP could do redirects. Now you're backpedaling.
>>> nope...read again...then post the claim, i.e. quote me.
>>>
>>>> Keep it up, stoopid troll.
>>> yes, do.
>>>
>>>>>>> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say,
>>>>>>> "hey everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in
>>>>>>> that case ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom
>>>>>>> campaign, YOU claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply
>>>>>>> proof. i simply reject your claim because of lack of proof on your
>>>>>>> part and first-hand knowlege to the contrary. whether i say you're
>>>>>>> wrong because i have proof to the contrary or not, your claim is
>>>>>>> simply rejected because you have no supporing evidence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.
>>>>> really? lol.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
>>>>>> But you can't, loser.
>>>>> idiot. you said i was not a programmer. it's up to *you* to prove it. i
>>>>> and my employers know otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>> Yea, right. You claim you are a programmer. I challenged your claim.
>>>> Prove it, stoopid.
>>> already addressed this with quotes and message id's. post my original
>>> 'claim', i.e. quote me.
>>>
>> Already have quoted you - multiple times. But you can't read because
>> you're just a stoopid troll.
>
> never once. but, you keep thinking that.
>
>> Get lost, loser. You boor me.
>
> all you've got to do, jer, is stop responding. you're a sad, lonely old man.
> i suspect i provide you with much of your 'human' interaction. i hope you
> can still wipe your own ass.
>
> cheers.
>
>
>

ROFLMAO! Your can't wipe your ass because your head is so far up it.

Stoopid troll.

And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church members
and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't. You're
so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an alias
with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you really are
- and that you aren't even a programmer.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...

> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church members
> and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't. You're so
> desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an alias with the
> hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you really are - and that
> you aren't even a programmer.

ooohhh...look at the troll.

i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's no more
deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately upon meeting
someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)

as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all about
me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so easily done -
then not giving my name and address as part of my sig wouldn't be necessary.
so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find out jack about me. yet
another false claim from jerry-berry.

jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to just have
someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we could just
converse like adults instead of being adolescents - admittedly, mostly
childish on your side.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church members
>> and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't. You're so
>> desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an alias with the
>> hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you really are - and that
>> you aren't even a programmer.
>
> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>
> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's no more
> deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately upon meeting
> someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>

You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.

> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all about
> me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so easily done -
> then not giving my name and address as part of my sig wouldn't be necessary.
> so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find out jack about me. yet
> another false claim from jerry-berry.
>

I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.

> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to just have
> someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we could just
> converse like adults instead of being adolescents - admittedly, mostly
> childish on your side.
>
>
>

Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church members
>>> and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't. You're
>>> so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an alias
>>> with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you really
>>> are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>
>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>
>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's no
>> more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately upon
>> meeting someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>>
>
> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak louder
> than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.

ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)

>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all about
>> me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so easily done -
>> then not giving my name and address as part of my sig wouldn't be
>> necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find out jack about
>> me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>
>
> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.

first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and have.

>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to just
>> have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we could just
>> converse like adults instead of being adolescents - admittedly, mostly
>> childish on your side.
>
> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!

nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>
>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church members
>>>> and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't. You're
>>>> so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an alias
>>>> with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you really
>>>> are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>
>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's no
>>> more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately upon
>>> meeting someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>>>
>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak louder
>> than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>
> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>

I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.

>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all about
>>> me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so easily done -
>>> then not giving my name and address as part of my sig wouldn't be
>>> necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find out jack about
>>> me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>
>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>
> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and have.
>

Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.

>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to just
>>> have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we could just
>>> converse like adults instead of being adolescents - admittedly, mostly
>>> childish on your side.
>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>
> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>
>
>

Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:


Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?

FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the pissing
posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of you and
that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd good thing
to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.

Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.

Re: Post with redirect?

rf wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>
>
> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>
> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the pissing
> posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of you and
> that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd good thing
> to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.
>
> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>
>
>

Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm not
here to entertain you.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>
>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't.
>>>>> You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an
>>>>> alias with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you
>>>>> really are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>
>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's no
>>>> more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately upon
>>>> meeting someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>>>>
>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
>>> louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>
>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>
>
> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.

i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think it's me,
then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since i'm sure you
don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to everyone you greet.

>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all
>>>> about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so easily
>>>> done - then not giving my name and address as part of my sig wouldn't
>>>> be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find out jack
>>>> about me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>>
>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>
>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and have.
>>
>
> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.

so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you could.
you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who i am.

>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to just
>>>> have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we could
>>>> just converse like adults instead of being adolescents - admittedly,
>>>> mostly childish on your side.
>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>
>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>
> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.

nope, facts are more in line with your classic projection...knuckle-dragger.
get back under your bridge and wait for a new passerby.

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:I9KdnWxnZIbsQOHanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcast.com...
> rf wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>>
>> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the pissing
>> posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of you and
>> that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd good
>> thing to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.
>>
>> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>
> Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm not
> here to entertain you.

classic troll's response. btw, we all understand that you're just out to
'entertain' yourself here, jerry-berry. it's called masturbation. and, you
do it with such fervor.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really don't.
>>>>>> You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide behind an
>>>>>> alias with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a case you
>>>>>> really are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>>
>>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's no
>>>>> more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately upon
>>>>> meeting someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>>>>>
>>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
>>>> louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>>
>> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.
>
> i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think it's me,
> then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since i'm sure you
> don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to everyone you greet.
>

ROFLMAO! You are lying by actions, if not by words.

>>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all
>>>>> about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so easily
>>>>> done - then not giving my name and address as part of my sig wouldn't
>>>>> be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find out jack
>>>>> about me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>>>
>>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and have.
>>>
>> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.
>
> so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you could.
> you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who i am.
>

Nope, you aren't worth the effort, Stevie.

>>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to just
>>>>> have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we could
>>>>> just converse like adults instead of being adolescents - admittedly,
>>>>> mostly childish on your side.
>>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.
>
> nope, facts are more in line with your classic projection...knuckle-dragger.
> get back under your bridge and wait for a new passerby.
>
>

Yep, you're right. I stick with the facts.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:CPudnZvfgeAvg-DanZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really
>>>>>>> don't. You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide
>>>>>>> behind an alias with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a
>>>>>>> case you really are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's
>>>>>> no more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately
>>>>>> upon meeting someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
>>>>> louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>>>
>>> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.
>>
>> i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think it's
>> me, then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since i'm sure
>> you don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to everyone you greet.
>>
>
> ROFLMAO! You are lying by actions, if not by words.

lying by action? can you honestly tell me that the way theists behave is
distinguishable from atheists? so, how do you presume to know my actions?

>>>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all
>>>>>> about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so
>>>>>> easily done - then not giving my name and address as part of my sig
>>>>>> wouldn't be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find
>>>>>> out jack about me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and
>>>> have.
>>>>
>>> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.
>>
>> so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you could.
>> you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who i am.
>>
>
> Nope, you aren't worth the effort, Stevie.

you keep saying that all the while spending hours on trolling this and other
threads wherein i've posted. you're obviously spending an enormous amount of
time on me. since the feat is so simple according to you, why not do it and
really show me up.

you can't. further, you've got no idea on how to go about it.

>>>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to
>>>>>> just have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we
>>>>>> could just converse like adults instead of being adolescents -
>>>>>> admittedly, mostly childish on your side.
>>>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>>> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.
>>
>> nope, facts are more in line with your classic
>> projection...knuckle-dragger. get back under your bridge and wait for a
>> new passerby.
>
> Yep, you're right.

you really can't read, can you.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:CPudnZvfgeAvg-DanZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really
>>>>>>>> don't. You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide
>>>>>>>> behind an alias with the hope that no one will find out how sad of a
>>>>>>>> case you really are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>>>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's
>>>>>>> no more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole immediately
>>>>>>> upon meeting someone. it's something they'll find out soon enough. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
>>>>>> louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>>>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>>>>
>>>> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.
>>> i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think it's
>>> me, then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since i'm sure
>>> you don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to everyone you greet.
>>>
>> ROFLMAO! You are lying by actions, if not by words.
>
> lying by action? can you honestly tell me that the way theists behave is
> distinguishable from atheists? so, how do you presume to know my actions?
>

You are attending a church and worshiping with people who believe in
God, yet you do not. And you don't tell them you're a hypocrite.

>>>>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all
>>>>>>> about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so
>>>>>>> easily done - then not giving my name and address as part of my sig
>>>>>>> wouldn't be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T find
>>>>>>> out jack about me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>>>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and
>>>>> have.
>>>>>
>>>> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.
>>> so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you could.
>>> you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who i am.
>>>
>> Nope, you aren't worth the effort, Stevie.
>
> you keep saying that all the while spending hours on trolling this and other
> threads wherein i've posted. you're obviously spending an enormous amount of
> time on me. since the feat is so simple according to you, why not do it and
> really show me up.
>
> you can't. further, you've got no idea on how to go about it.
>

Nope, I could if I wanted to. But you're not worth the effort, Stevie.

Can't stand that, can you? ROFLMAO!

>>>>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to
>>>>>>> just have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we
>>>>>>> could just converse like adults instead of being adolescents -
>>>>>>> admittedly, mostly childish on your side.
>>>>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>>>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>>>> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.
>>> nope, facts are more in line with your classic
>>> projection...knuckle-dragger. get back under your bridge and wait for a
>>> new passerby.
>> Yep, you're right.
>
> you really can't read, can you.
>
>
>

Sure I can.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:I9KdnWxnZIbsQOHanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcast.com...
> rf wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>>
>> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the pissing
>> posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of you and
>> that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd good
>> thing to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.
>>
>> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>
> Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm not
> here to entertain you.

Fuckwit.

Re: Post with redirect?

rf wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:I9KdnWxnZIbsQOHanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> rf wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>>>
>>> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the pissing
>>> posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of you and
>>> that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd good
>>> thing to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.
>>>
>>> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>> Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm not
>> here to entertain you.
>
> Fuckwit.
>
>
>

You really shouldn't talk about yourself like that.

You don't like it? Ignore the thread.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:7LSdnYDnYYd2DODanZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@comcast.com...
> rf wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:I9KdnWxnZIbsQOHanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> rf wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>>>>
>>>> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the
>>>> pissing posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of
>>>> you and that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd
>>>> good thing to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.
>>>>
>>>> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>>> Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm not
>>> here to entertain you.
>>
>> Fuckwit.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You really shouldn't talk about yourself like that.
>
> You don't like it? Ignore the thread.

what a fucking troll you are, jerry! get a life.

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:R4udnRXg6adSsODanZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:CPudnZvfgeAvg-DanZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really
>>>>>>>>> don't. You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide
>>>>>>>>> behind an alias with the hope that no one will find out how sad of
>>>>>>>>> a case you really are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>>>>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's
>>>>>>>> no more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole
>>>>>>>> immediately upon meeting someone. it's something they'll find out
>>>>>>>> soon enough. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
>>>>>>> louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>>>>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.
>>>> i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think it's
>>>> me, then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since i'm sure
>>>> you don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to everyone you
>>>> greet.
>>>>
>>> ROFLMAO! You are lying by actions, if not by words.
>>
>> lying by action? can you honestly tell me that the way theists behave is
>> distinguishable from atheists? so, how do you presume to know my actions?
>>
>
> You are attending a church and worshiping with people who believe in God,
> yet you do not. And you don't tell them you're a hypocrite.

i'd be a hypocrite if i *did* worship in the church yet didn't believe in
what i was praising. as it is, my presence there has nothing to do with
worship. but, we've been over that...your mental processes are just fucked
is all.

>>>>>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all
>>>>>>>> about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so
>>>>>>>> easily done - then not giving my name and address as part of my sig
>>>>>>>> wouldn't be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T
>>>>>>>> find out jack about me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>>>>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and
>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.
>>>> so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you
>>>> could. you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who i
>>>> am.
>>>>
>>> Nope, you aren't worth the effort, Stevie.
>>
>> you keep saying that all the while spending hours on trolling this and
>> other threads wherein i've posted. you're obviously spending an enormous
>> amount of time on me. since the feat is so simple according to you, why
>> not do it and really show me up.
>>
>> you can't. further, you've got no idea on how to go about it.
>>
>
> Nope, I could if I wanted to. But you're not worth the effort, Stevie.

lol. suuuuuuure you could. again, if you can't put up, then shut up.

> Can't stand that, can you? ROFLMAO!

stand what? again, you assume that i care about you enough to value your
estimation(s) of me. let me assure you, i don't. i bet you troll here
because others hold you in the same light - you just don't matter to very
many people, jerr. THAT is what YOU can't seem to stand. keep trolling if it
makes you feel better though.

>>>>>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to
>>>>>>>> just have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we
>>>>>>>> could just converse like adults instead of being adolescents -
>>>>>>>> admittedly, mostly childish on your side.
>>>>>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>>>>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>>>>> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.
>>>> nope, facts are more in line with your classic
>>>> projection...knuckle-dragger. get back under your bridge and wait for a
>>>> new passerby.
>>> Yep, you're right.
>>
>> you really can't read, can you.
>
> Sure I can.

then you'd have known that i said you calling me a troll was really you
projecting your behavior on me...to which you agreed. either you're
illiterate, or just stupid. i get the feeling you're a bit of both.

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:7LSdnYDnYYd2DODanZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> rf wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:I9KdnWxnZIbsQOHanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> rf wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the
>>>>> pissing posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either of
>>>>> you and that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have the odd
>>>>> good thing to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>>>> Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm not
>>>> here to entertain you.
>>> Fuckwit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You really shouldn't talk about yourself like that.
>>
>> You don't like it? Ignore the thread.
>
> what a fucking troll you are, jerry! get a life.
>
>
>

Go to hell, stalking troll. I wasn't talking to you.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
> news:R4udnRXg6adSsODanZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Steve wrote:
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>> news:CPudnZvfgeAvg-DanZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>>>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really
>>>>>>>>>> don't. You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to hide
>>>>>>>>>> behind an alias with the hope that no one will find out how sad of
>>>>>>>>>> a case you really are - and that you aren't even a programmer.
>>>>>>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them. that's
>>>>>>>>> no more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole
>>>>>>>>> immediately upon meeting someone. it's something they'll find out
>>>>>>>>> soon enough. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions speak
>>>>>>>> louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>>>>>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.
>>>>> i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think it's
>>>>> me, then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since i'm sure
>>>>> you don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to everyone you
>>>>> greet.
>>>>>
>>>> ROFLMAO! You are lying by actions, if not by words.
>>> lying by action? can you honestly tell me that the way theists behave is
>>> distinguishable from atheists? so, how do you presume to know my actions?
>>>
>> You are attending a church and worshiping with people who believe in God,
>> yet you do not. And you don't tell them you're a hypocrite.
>
> i'd be a hypocrite if i *did* worship in the church yet didn't believe in
> what i was praising. as it is, my presence there has nothing to do with
> worship. but, we've been over that...your mental processes are just fucked
> is all.
>

ROFLMAO! Just like a stoopid hypocrite. Trying desperately to justify
your lying actions. Just as you're desperately trying to find
acceptance SOMEPLACE.

>>>>>>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out all
>>>>>>>>> about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's so
>>>>>>>>> easily done - then not giving my name and address as part of my sig
>>>>>>>>> wouldn't be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you CAN'T
>>>>>>>>> find out jack about me. yet another false claim from jerry-berry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>>>>>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and
>>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.
>>>>> so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you
>>>>> could. you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who i
>>>>> am.
>>>>>
>>>> Nope, you aren't worth the effort, Stevie.
>>> you keep saying that all the while spending hours on trolling this and
>>> other threads wherein i've posted. you're obviously spending an enormous
>>> amount of time on me. since the feat is so simple according to you, why
>>> not do it and really show me up.
>>>
>>> you can't. further, you've got no idea on how to go about it.
>>>
>> Nope, I could if I wanted to. But you're not worth the effort, Stevie.
>
> lol. suuuuuuure you could. again, if you can't put up, then shut up.
>
>> Can't stand that, can you? ROFLMAO!
>
> stand what? again, you assume that i care about you enough to value your
> estimation(s) of me. let me assure you, i don't. i bet you troll here
> because others hold you in the same light - you just don't matter to very
> many people, jerr. THAT is what YOU can't seem to stand. keep trolling if it
> makes you feel better though.
>

ROFLMAO! If you don't care, why do you keep responding?

You just can't stand being told you're not worth the effort.

I'm quite happy with my life. Unlike you, loser.

>>>>>>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to
>>>>>>>>> just have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then we
>>>>>>>>> could just converse like adults instead of being adolescents -
>>>>>>>>> admittedly, mostly childish on your side.
>>>>>>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>>>>>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>>>>>> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.
>>>>> nope, facts are more in line with your classic
>>>>> projection...knuckle-dragger. get back under your bridge and wait for a
>>>>> new passerby.
>>>> Yep, you're right.
>>> you really can't read, can you.
>> Sure I can.
>
> then you'd have known that i said you calling me a troll was really you
> projecting your behavior on me...to which you agreed. either you're
> illiterate, or just stupid. i get the feeling you're a bit of both.
>
>
>

ROFLMAO! Just like a three-year-old. Teach you about something new
(projecting) and you have to apply it to everyone.

That's exactly what projecting is, Stevie-troll. And it's one of the
chief methods trolls like you try to make other people the bad guy -
when it's really them.

You've told us enough about your poor, pathetic life that we understand you.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:ocidnZ74vbucrePanZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:7LSdnYDnYYd2DODanZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> rf wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:I9KdnWxnZIbsQOHanZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> rf wrote:
>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>> Are you pair still indulging in your pissing contest?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW you both look like bloody idiots, losing credibility as the
>>>>>> pissing posts go on. I for one no longer read *anything* from either
>>>>>> of you and that, Stuckle, is sad because you did occasionally have
>>>>>> the odd good thing to say, when you were not pissing in the wind that
>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not just give it a fucking rest. It's worse than that MI5 bloke.
>>>>> Quite frankly, I don't care if you read anything I say or not. I'm
>>>>> not here to entertain you.
>>>> Fuckwit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You really shouldn't talk about yourself like that.
>>>
>>> You don't like it? Ignore the thread.
>>
>> what a fucking troll you are, jerry! get a life.
>
> Go to hell, stalking troll. I wasn't talking to you.

wow. how terribly 'christian' of you, jerry. seems you're lying to your
parisioners more that you think i am. aren't your 'moral' codes an absolute
standard? rof! i guess not...at least when it comes to you. :)

Re: Post with redirect?

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
news:6KmdneI59_CnrOPanZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>> news:R4udnRXg6adSsODanZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Steve wrote:
>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>> news:CPudnZvfgeAvg-DanZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:MLidnW8_C4C89OHanZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:kdGdnbE31475iOHanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:EYCdnVnzU6zVOufanZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And no, I'm not a sorry person like you - have to lie to church
>>>>>>>>>>> members and let them think I believe in their God when I really
>>>>>>>>>>> don't. You're so desperate for any acceptance you even try to
>>>>>>>>>>> hide behind an alias with the hope that no one will find out how
>>>>>>>>>>> sad of a case you really are - and that you aren't even a
>>>>>>>>>>> programmer.
>>>>>>>>>> ooohhh...look at the troll.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i don't lie to church members. if they asked, i'd tell them.
>>>>>>>>>> that's no more deceptive than you NOT stating you're an asshole
>>>>>>>>>> immediately upon meeting someone. it's something they'll find out
>>>>>>>>>> soon enough. :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You lie by your actions, troll. Remember the saying "Actions
>>>>>>>>> speak louder than words"? You don't need to talk to lie.
>>>>>>>> ok, cliche-boi..."that's the pot calling the kettle black". :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not the one lying to fellow parishioners.
>>>>>> i'm not either. so, to whom are you referring? if you still think
>>>>>> it's me, then you must consider yourself the purveyor of lies since
>>>>>> i'm sure you don't introduce yourself as a clueless asshole to
>>>>>> everyone you greet.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ROFLMAO! You are lying by actions, if not by words.
>>>> lying by action? can you honestly tell me that the way theists behave
>>>> is distinguishable from atheists? so, how do you presume to know my
>>>> actions?
>>>>
>>> You are attending a church and worshiping with people who believe in
>>> God, yet you do not. And you don't tell them you're a hypocrite.
>>
>> i'd be a hypocrite if i *did* worship in the church yet didn't believe in
>> what i was praising. as it is, my presence there has nothing to do with
>> worship. but, we've been over that...your mental processes are just
>> fucked is all.
>>
>
> ROFLMAO! Just like a stoopid hypocrite. Trying desperately to justify
> your lying actions. Just as you're desperately trying to find acceptance
> SOMEPLACE.

sorry, that's just not the case. socializing my kids and putting them in an
environment where they will work with others to help others. as there are no
atheist churches - though i'm sure if there were, they'd also engage in
helping others - i cannot take them there...as would be my preference.

that's the end of that.

>>>>>>>>>> as for you caring about my alias, you said you *could* find out
>>>>>>>>>> all about me...*if* you wanted to. were that the case - that it's
>>>>>>>>>> so easily done - then not giving my name and address as part of
>>>>>>>>>> my sig wouldn't be necessary. so, what's your point? oh yeah, you
>>>>>>>>>> CAN'T find out jack about me. yet another false claim from
>>>>>>>>>> jerry-berry.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I could. I'm just not interested in spending the time.
>>>>>>>> first, put up or shut up...or at least quit acting like you can and
>>>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. Like other trolls you're not worth the effort.
>>>>>> so, you *can't* do it...but we both knew that when you claimed you
>>>>>> could. you can quit the guise then and stop acting like you know who
>>>>>> i am.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, you aren't worth the effort, Stevie.
>>>> you keep saying that all the while spending hours on trolling this and
>>>> other threads wherein i've posted. you're obviously spending an
>>>> enormous amount of time on me. since the feat is so simple according to
>>>> you, why not do it and really show me up.
>>>>
>>>> you can't. further, you've got no idea on how to go about it.
>>>>
>>> Nope, I could if I wanted to. But you're not worth the effort, Stevie.
>>
>> lol. suuuuuuure you could. again, if you can't put up, then shut up.
>>
>>> Can't stand that, can you? ROFLMAO!
>>
>> stand what? again, you assume that i care about you enough to value your
>> estimation(s) of me. let me assure you, i don't. i bet you troll here
>> because others hold you in the same light - you just don't matter to very
>> many people, jerr. THAT is what YOU can't seem to stand. keep trolling if
>> it makes you feel better though.
>>
>
> ROFLMAO! If you don't care, why do you keep responding?

did you miss the word 'entertainment' when i answered this question
before...over, and over again?

> You just can't stand being told you're not worth the effort.

no, i didn't give it a second thought until you mentioned that i 'couldn't
stand' it...and that, just to ask how you arrive at that conclusion. turns
out, you're just delutional.

> I'm quite happy with my life. Unlike you, loser.

it doesn't seem so. ever hear this before? 'from the abundance of the heart,
the mouth speaks'. i know, off to google you go again. however, the phrase
usually holds true. seems you've got a lot of vile, festering 'self' issues
going on there...and it spews forth here. your actions are to the contrary
to your claim of a 'happy' life.

>>>>>>>>>> jerry, sad is calling others trolls while trolling...and that, to
>>>>>>>>>> just have someone to 'talk' to. you should just admit that, then
>>>>>>>>>> we could just converse like adults instead of being adolescents -
>>>>>>>>>> admittedly, mostly childish on your side.
>>>>>>>>> Trolling again, huh, Stevie? ROFLMAO!
>>>>>>>> nope. statement of fact - the things you seem to avoid.
>>>>>>> Yep. Statement of fact. You're trolling again, Stevie.
>>>>>> nope, facts are more in line with your classic
>>>>>> projection...knuckle-dragger. get back under your bridge and wait for
>>>>>> a new passerby.
>>>>> Yep, you're right.
>>>> you really can't read, can you.
>>> Sure I can.
>>
>> then you'd have known that i said you calling me a troll was really you
>> projecting your behavior on me...to which you agreed. either you're
>> illiterate, or just stupid. i get the feeling you're a bit of both.
>
> ROFLMAO! Just like a three-year-old. Teach you about something new
> (projecting) and you have to apply it to everyone.

i learned about projection in 'clinical diagnosis 435' a long time ago in
college. it's hardly new to me. college, however, is probably very foreign
to you.

> That's exactly what projecting is, Stevie-troll. And it's one of the
> chief methods trolls like you try to make other people the bad guy - when
> it's really them.

you're right...only, you're describing yourself, not me.

> You've told us enough about your poor, pathetic life that we understand
> you.

i've said nothing that would indicate the quality of my life. you must once
again, be projecting.