Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 29.12.2007 16:10:00 von Rasheed
Hi,
We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1. The
application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET 2.0
component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk Update
feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so, please
provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the appropriate
resources?
Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
Appreciate your help!
Rasheed
Re: Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 29.12.2007 17:59:20 von smar
This is not possible. If you use a .NET 2.0 component, you need the 2.0
..NET Framework to run the applicaiton.
"Rasheed" wrote in message
news:9B7F07FE-3882-42E8-9216-AFA0EF440AA5@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1. The
> application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET 2.0
> component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk Update
> feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so, please
> provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the appropriate
> resources?
>
> Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
>
> Appreciate your help!
>
> Rasheed
>
Re: Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 30.12.2007 00:15:00 von Rasheed
Thanks Scott. We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition to
..NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from ASP.NET
1.1 (.NET 1.1) application?
Thanks,
Rasheed
"Scott M." wrote:
> This is not possible. If you use a .NET 2.0 component, you need the 2.0
> ..NET Framework to run the applicaiton.
>
>
> "Rasheed" wrote in message
> news:9B7F07FE-3882-42E8-9216-AFA0EF440AA5@microsoft.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1. The
> > application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET 2.0
> > component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk Update
> > feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so, please
> > provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the appropriate
> > resources?
> >
> > Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
> >
> > Appreciate your help!
> >
> > Rasheed
> >
>
>
>
Re: Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 30.12.2007 01:24:52 von Phil H
On 29 Dec, 23:15, Rasheed wrote:
> Thanks Scott. =A0We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition t=
o
> .NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from ASP.NE=
T
> 1.1 (.NET 1.1) application?
>
> Thanks,
> Rasheed
>
>
>
> "Scott M." wrote:
> > This is not possible. =A0If you use a .NET 2.0 component, you need the 2=
..0
> > ..NET Framework to run the applicaiton.
>
> > "Rasheed" wrote in message
> >news:9B7F07FE-3882-42E8-9216-AFA0EF440AA5@microsoft.com...
> > > Hi,
>
> > > We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1. The
> > > application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET 2.0=
> > > component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk Update=
> > > feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so, plea=
se
> > > provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the appropriate=
> > > resources?
>
> > > Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
>
> > > Appreciate your help!
>
> > > Rasheed- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Rasheed
You cannot expect ASP.NET v 1.1 to recognise and handle new components
introduced in v 2.0 The latter was developed ouside of the design
limitations of v 1.1 (it is reasonable to assume the ASP.NET v 1.1
developer's brief did not extend to unforseen enhancements), hence the
introduction of a new version of ASP.NET.
Had you put the question the other way round then the answer would be
Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.
Re: Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 30.12.2007 01:54:01 von Rasheed
Thanks Phill. This helps.
My bad, I though it may be possible to âconfigureâ a specific component of
..NET 1.1 application to use .NET 2.0 framework (which is what we want as we
do not want to migrate the entire application to .NET 2.0 platform). I guess
a single process/domain can use only one target framework at a time.
Thanks,
Rasheed
"Phil H" wrote:
> On 29 Dec, 23:15, Rasheed wrote:
> > Thanks Scott. We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition to
> > .NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from ASP.NET
> > 1.1 (.NET 1.1) application?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rasheed
> >
> >
> >
> > "Scott M." wrote:
> > > This is not possible. If you use a .NET 2.0 component, you need the 2..0
> > > ..NET Framework to run the applicaiton.
> >
> > > "Rasheed" wrote in message
> > >news:9B7F07FE-3882-42E8-9216-AFA0EF440AA5@microsoft.com...
> > > > Hi,
> >
> > > > We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1. The
> > > > application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET 2.0
> > > > component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk Update
> > > > feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so, please
> > > > provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the appropriate
> > > > resources?
> >
> > > > Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
> >
> > > > Appreciate your help!
> >
> > > > Rasheed- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Rasheed
>
> You cannot expect ASP.NET v 1.1 to recognise and handle new components
> introduced in v 2.0 The latter was developed ouside of the design
> limitations of v 1.1 (it is reasonable to assume the ASP.NET v 1.1
> developer's brief did not extend to unforseen enhancements), hence the
> introduction of a new version of ASP.NET.
>
> Had you put the question the other way round then the answer would be
> Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
> because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.
>
>
Re: Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 30.12.2007 02:31:24 von smar
The .NET Framework consists of a set of base classes and a Common Language
Runtime. The various CLR's are not forward compatible as version 1.1's
runtime would not understand something introduced in the 2.0 Framework.
If you wish to use any portion of 2.0, you must upgrade your application to
be an ASP .NET 2.0 applicaiton. The good news is that if you do migrate the
1.1 application to 2.0, everything that used to work will still work as 2.0
is backward compatible with 1.1, even though 1.1 is not forward compatible
with 2.0. If you already have the 2.0 Framework installed on your servers,
this is going to be your best bet.
-Scott
"Rasheed" wrote in message
news:6AC80FA7-BB84-4268-B2E1-75907BED41E8@microsoft.com...
> Thanks Phill. This helps.
>
> My bad, I though it may be possible to "configure" a specific component of
> .NET 1.1 application to use .NET 2.0 framework (which is what we want as
> we
> do not want to migrate the entire application to .NET 2.0 platform). I
> guess
> a single process/domain can use only one target framework at a time.
>
> Thanks,
> Rasheed
>
>
> "Phil H" wrote:
>
>> On 29 Dec, 23:15, Rasheed wrote:
>> > Thanks Scott. We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition
>> > to
>> > .NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from
>> > ASP.NET
>> > 1.1 (.NET 1.1) application?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Rasheed
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Scott M." wrote:
>> > > This is not possible. If you use a .NET 2.0 component, you need the
>> > > 2..0
>> > > ..NET Framework to run the applicaiton.
>> >
>> > > "Rasheed" wrote in message
>> > >news:9B7F07FE-3882-42E8-9216-AFA0EF440AA5@microsoft.com...
>> > > > Hi,
>> >
>> > > > We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1.
>> > > > The
>> > > > application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET
>> > > > 2.0
>> > > > component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk
>> > > > Update
>> > > > feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so,
>> > > > please
>> > > > provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the
>> > > > appropriate
>> > > > resources?
>> >
>> > > > Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
>> >
>> > > > Appreciate your help!
>> >
>> > > > Rasheed- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Rasheed
>>
>> You cannot expect ASP.NET v 1.1 to recognise and handle new components
>> introduced in v 2.0 The latter was developed ouside of the design
>> limitations of v 1.1 (it is reasonable to assume the ASP.NET v 1.1
>> developer's brief did not extend to unforseen enhancements), hence the
>> introduction of a new version of ASP.NET.
>>
>> Had you put the question the other way round then the answer would be
>> Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
>> because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.
>>
>>
Re: Using .NET 2.0/3.0 component in ASP.NET 1.1
am 30.12.2007 02:41:01 von Rasheed
Thanks Scot. Appreciate your feedback.
Abdul
"Scott M." wrote:
> The .NET Framework consists of a set of base classes and a Common Language
> Runtime. The various CLR's are not forward compatible as version 1.1's
> runtime would not understand something introduced in the 2.0 Framework.
>
> If you wish to use any portion of 2.0, you must upgrade your application to
> be an ASP .NET 2.0 applicaiton. The good news is that if you do migrate the
> 1.1 application to 2.0, everything that used to work will still work as 2.0
> is backward compatible with 1.1, even though 1.1 is not forward compatible
> with 2.0. If you already have the 2.0 Framework installed on your servers,
> this is going to be your best bet.
>
> -Scott
>
>
> "Rasheed" wrote in message
> news:6AC80FA7-BB84-4268-B2E1-75907BED41E8@microsoft.com...
> > Thanks Phill. This helps.
> >
> > My bad, I though it may be possible to "configure" a specific component of
> > .NET 1.1 application to use .NET 2.0 framework (which is what we want as
> > we
> > do not want to migrate the entire application to .NET 2.0 platform). I
> > guess
> > a single process/domain can use only one target framework at a time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rasheed
> >
> >
> > "Phil H" wrote:
> >
> >> On 29 Dec, 23:15, Rasheed wrote:
> >> > Thanks Scott. We do have the .NET 2.0 framework installed in addition
> >> > to
> >> > .NET 1.1. Are you saying.NET 2.0 components cannot be accessed from
> >> > ASP.NET
> >> > 1.1 (.NET 1.1) application?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Rasheed
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Scott M." wrote:
> >> > > This is not possible. If you use a .NET 2.0 component, you need the
> >> > > 2..0
> >> > > ..NET Framework to run the applicaiton.
> >> >
> >> > > "Rasheed" wrote in message
> >> > >news:9B7F07FE-3882-42E8-9216-AFA0EF440AA5@microsoft.com...
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > > > We have an ASP.NET 1.1 application which uses .NET framework 1.1.
> >> > > > The
> >> > > > application is hosted in IIS 5.0 win 2000. We want to write a .NET
> >> > > > 2.0
> >> > > > component (which leverages .NET 2.0 Framework, Ex: Dataset Bulk
> >> > > > Update
> >> > > > feature) and access it from ASP.NET 1.1. Is this possible? If so,
> >> > > > please
> >> > > > provide inputs on how this can be done or direct me to the
> >> > > > appropriate
> >> > > > resources?
> >> >
> >> > > > Note: We have both the framework installed in the web server.
> >> >
> >> > > > Appreciate your help!
> >> >
> >> > > > Rasheed- Hide quoted text -
> >> >
> >> > - Show quoted text -
> >>
> >> Rasheed
> >>
> >> You cannot expect ASP.NET v 1.1 to recognise and handle new components
> >> introduced in v 2.0 The latter was developed ouside of the design
> >> limitations of v 1.1 (it is reasonable to assume the ASP.NET v 1.1
> >> developer's brief did not extend to unforseen enhancements), hence the
> >> introduction of a new version of ASP.NET.
> >>
> >> Had you put the question the other way round then the answer would be
> >> Yes, ASP.NET v 2 is backward compatible with v 1.1 but that's only
> >> because it was developed with full knowledge of the previous version.
> >>
> >>
>
>
>