Version upgrade rules?

Version upgrade rules?

am 03.01.2008 14:28:29 von Jonathan Sachs

Can someone refer me to an explanation of Visual Studio's upgrade
rules: which versions can be upgrade to which? I can't find them at
microsoft.com or any of the vendors I've checked.

I'm specifically interested in upgrading Visual Studio .net
Professional (2002) to the current version of Professional or
Standard.

Re: Version upgrade rules?

am 03.01.2008 15:25:03 von skeet

Jonathan Sachs wrote:
> Can someone refer me to an explanation of Visual Studio's upgrade
> rules: which versions can be upgrade to which? I can't find them at
> microsoft.com or any of the vendors I've checked.
>
> I'm specifically interested in upgrading Visual Studio .net
> Professional (2002) to the current version of Professional or
> Standard.

Are you talking about the technicalities, or pricing? When you install
VS 2008 (or other versions) it doesn't upgrade the previous version, it
just installs alongside the old one.

--
Jon Skeet -
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

Re: Version upgrade rules?

am 03.01.2008 17:49:42 von Jonathan Sachs

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:25:03 -0000, Jon Skeet [C# MVP]
wrote:

>> Can someone refer me to an explanation of Visual Studio's upgrade
>> rules...?
>
>Are you talking about the technicalities, or pricing? When you install
>VS 2008 (or other versions) it doesn't upgrade the previous version, it
>just installs alongside the old one.

Pricing. I didn't know old and new versions could be installed side
by side, but I don't have a need to do that anyway.

I'm sure you're aware of this, but I'm in the US, and the policies
might be different here than in Europe.

Re: Version upgrade rules?

am 03.01.2008 18:47:07 von skeet

Jonathan Sachs wrote:
> >Are you talking about the technicalities, or pricing? When you install
> >VS 2008 (or other versions) it doesn't upgrade the previous version, it
> >just installs alongside the old one.
>
> Pricing. I didn't know old and new versions could be installed side
> by side, but I don't have a need to do that anyway.
>
> I'm sure you're aware of this, but I'm in the US, and the policies
> might be different here than in Europe.

In that case, I suspect http://microsoft.com/vstudio is your best bet.
I wouldn't hold out too much hope of an upgrade price having skipped 2
major versions though.

--
Jon Skeet -
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

Re: Version upgrade rules?

am 03.01.2008 23:51:56 von spam.netmaster

> Pricing



"Upgrade information for Visual Studio 2005 Professional:
Customers who qualify for the upgrade price include licensed users
of the following Microsoft and competitor products:"


as this even lists e.g. the very old 'Visual C++ 5.0',
I guess VS 2002->2008 will be valid, too.








--
Thomas Scheidegger - 'NETMaster'
http://www.cetus-links.org/oo_dotnet.html - http://dnetmaster.net/

Re: Version upgrade rules?

am 04.01.2008 00:08:02 von Jonathan Sachs

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:51:56 +0100, "Thomas Scheidegger"
wrote:

> > Pricing
>
>
>
> "Upgrade information for Visual Studio 2005 Professional:
> Customers who qualify for the upgrade price include licensed users
> of the following Microsoft and competitor products:"
>
>
>as this even lists e.g. the very old 'Visual C++ 5.0',
>I guess VS 2002->2008 will be valid, too.

Yup, it's listed there. As I own and old Visual C++ as well -- if I
can unearth it -- I guess I qualify twice!

While waiting for the answer to this question I found something else
that complicates my decision. I'll post a question shortly under the
title "Port Java to J# or C#?"