Should move to .net?

Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be
rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only advantage?

Thanks!

Re: Should move to .net?

"Paulo" wrote in message
news:OpAMSvtTIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be
> rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only advantage?
>

I could give you a list of the pros and cons but frankly if you have the
opportunity you should just do it.

--
Anthony Jones - MVP ASP/ASP.NET

Re: Should move to .net?

I would migrate all of your ASP apps to .NET. It'll benefit you in the long
run. Here are some benefits of going to .NET

http://colorado.verio.net/support/documents/view_article.cfm ?doc_id=3726


I would do a 'slow' migration though, meaning, take an existing app (of
course) and slowing migrate it over to .NET. The syntax will not be the same
so there may be a learning curve. That's one of the cons. You can find a
list of pros and cons online about migrating from ASP to .NET

personally, I say migrate to .NET as soon as you can

"Paulo" wrote in message
news:OpAMSvtTIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be
> rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only advantage?
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: Should move to .net?

Are you looking for a reason to move or do you already have one ?

if you want the sales pitch, go to MS website www.asp.net

personally I believe "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"


"Paulo" wrote in message news:OpAMSvtTIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only
> advantage?
>
> Thanks!
>

Re: Should move to .net?

""If it ain't broke, don't fix it" - I agree with that as well, even though
I suggest he migrate to .NET, I would say, keep your ASP apps as they are,
take an existing ASP web app and convert that over to .NET, that way he can
see the differences in ASP and .NET and he'll be learning .NET as well.

If he has 100 ASP web sites, then I say keep them as ASP and start doing all
'new sites' in .NET, but I would still migrate 1 or 2 of the ASP sites to
..NET. This way he can see how .NET works with db connections, showing data,
syntax, etc.



"Jon Paal [MSMD]" wrote in message
news:13nskejb82n80a9@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
> Are you looking for a reason to move or do you already have one ?
>
> if you want the sales pitch, go to MS website www.asp.net
>
> personally I believe "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"
>
>
> "Paulo" wrote in message
> news:OpAMSvtTIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be
>> rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only advantage?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>

Re: Should move to .net?

What the word "ain't" mean?

Thanks to all!

"Mike" escreveu na mensagem
news:OhHM3juTIHA.3676@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> ""If it ain't broke, don't fix it" - I agree with that as well, even
> though I suggest he migrate to .NET, I would say, keep your ASP apps as
> they are, take an existing ASP web app and convert that over to .NET, that
> way he can see the differences in ASP and .NET and he'll be learning .NET
> as well.
>
> If he has 100 ASP web sites, then I say keep them as ASP and start doing
> all 'new sites' in .NET, but I would still migrate 1 or 2 of the ASP sites
> to .NET. This way he can see how .NET works with db connections, showing
> data, syntax, etc.
>
>
>
> "Jon Paal [MSMD]" wrote in message
> news:13nskejb82n80a9@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>
>> Are you looking for a reason to move or do you already have one ?
>>
>> if you want the sales pitch, go to MS website www.asp.net
>>
>> personally I believe "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"
>>
>>
>> "Paulo" wrote in message
>> news:OpAMSvtTIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be
>>> rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only advantage?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Should move to .net?

"if its not broke, don't fix it"


"Paulo" wrote in message
news:eROs2puTIHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> What the word "ain't" mean?
>
> Thanks to all!
>
> "Mike" escreveu na mensagem
> news:OhHM3juTIHA.3676@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> ""If it ain't broke, don't fix it" - I agree with that as well, even
>> though I suggest he migrate to .NET, I would say, keep your ASP apps as
>> they are, take an existing ASP web app and convert that over to .NET,
>> that way he can see the differences in ASP and .NET and he'll be learning
>> .NET as well.
>>
>> If he has 100 ASP web sites, then I say keep them as ASP and start doing
>> all 'new sites' in .NET, but I would still migrate 1 or 2 of the ASP
>> sites to .NET. This way he can see how .NET works with db connections,
>> showing data, syntax, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Jon Paal [MSMD]" wrote in message
>> news:13nskejb82n80a9@corp.supernews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you looking for a reason to move or do you already have one ?
>>>
>>> if you want the sales pitch, go to MS website www.asp.net
>>>
>>> personally I believe "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"
>>>
>>>
>>> "Paulo" wrote in message
>>> news:OpAMSvtTIHA.3940@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> Hi, what do you think about moving to asp.net? All the code must be
>>>> rewritten! asp.net a lot more faster than asp ? is it only advantage?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Should move to .net?

Ain't is a contraction originally for "am not" and "are not", but now typically meaning "is not", "am not", "are not", "has not", or
"have not"

Re: Should move to .net?

this may be of interest also.

http://tinyurl.com/2f8xy9

Re: Should move to .net?

Thanks Jon and everyone! I am from Brasil and my english is not so good as
yours! but i am trying to learn!

thansk again and have a good year 2008!

"Jon Paal [MSMD]" escreveu na
mensagem news:13nsn14gn890p59@corp.supernews.com...
> this may be of interest also.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2f8xy9
>