Re: HTML Purifier

edwardzyang@gmail.com wrote:
> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> lists.
>
> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>

He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
NOT doing you any favors.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Re: HTML Purifier

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:55:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
wrote:

>edwardzyang@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
>He's a known troll

In *your* opinion. Which, given your own history on usenet, is worth
precisely sweet FA

>and spammer.

Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
start calling them a spammer with exactly NO evidence save his own
idea that anyone not agreeing with him MUST be one. Remember, readers,
Google is your friend. LOL at Stuckle thinking his history doesn't
follow him!

>With his reputation around here, he is
>NOT doing you any favors.

I put his rep several points up the scale from your own.

Re: HTML Purifier

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:55:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
wrote:

>edwardzyang@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
>He's a known troll

In *your* opinion. Which, given your own history on usenet, is worth
precisely sweet FA

>and spammer.

Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
start calling them a spammer with exactly NO evidence save his own
idea that anyone not agreeing with him MUST be one. Remember, readers,
Google is your friend. LOL at Stuckle thinking his history doesn't
follow him!

>With his reputation around here, he is
>NOT doing you any favors.

I put his rep several points up the scale from your own.

Re: HTML Purifier

<>



> Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
> start calling them a spammer
>

Stuckle could start a argument in a empty room .

As a ex troll myself - i would have to say that stuckle seems to be
under the illusion that as long as he helps one or two users every now
and then - he is allowed to insult/abuse anybody he feels like .

But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
his sorry ass .

In a way - and if anything - then you should feel pity towards him as
apart from usenet he doesnt have anything else in life to value .

Re: HTML Purifier

<>



> Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
> start calling them a spammer
>

Stuckle could start a argument in a empty room .

As a ex troll myself - i would have to say that stuckle seems to be
under the illusion that as long as he helps one or two users every now
and then - he is allowed to insult/abuse anybody he feels like .

But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
his sorry ass .

In a way - and if anything - then you should feel pity towards him as
apart from usenet he doesnt have anything else in life to value .

Re: HTML Purifier

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:59:14 GMT
Krustov scribed:

> But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
> itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
> braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
> his sorry ass .

I'm not going to frequent comp.lang.php just to find out, but do you have
any idea why this is so?

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.

Re: HTML Purifier

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:59:14 GMT
Krustov scribed:

> But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
> itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
> braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
> his sorry ass .

I'm not going to frequent comp.lang.php just to find out, but do you have
any idea why this is so?

--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.

Re: HTML Purifier

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:59:14 +0100, Krustov wrote:

>
> <>
>
>
>
>> Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
>> start calling them a spammer
>>
>
> Stuckle could start a argument in a empty room .
>
> As a ex troll myself - i would have to say that stuckle seems to be
> under the illusion that as long as he helps one or two users every now
> and then - he is allowed to insult/abuse anybody he feels like .
>
> But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
> itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
> braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
> his sorry ass .
>
> In a way - and if anything - then you should feel pity towards him as
> apart from usenet he doesnt have anything else in life to value .

Hmm, Jerry can be pretty anoying at times. However, for some balanced
argument, your main beef with him is that you tend to advocate 'sub
optimal' (to put it delicately) code as well, making you easy prey.

This is however getting off-topic in all crossposted groups (some of which
my rather slim newsserver doesn't carry, which is why this is not a post
in all groups). Please feel free to continue this argument in alt.flame
--
Rik Wasmus

Re: HTML Purifier

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:55:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
wrote:

>edwardzyang@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
>He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
>NOT doing you any favors.

OK, just to ask about the topic, HTMLPurifier, I'm considering using
it in my scripts, and I'd like to hear what the experts here think
about it.

Re: HTML Purifier

On 19/01/08 12:55, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> edwardzyang@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
> He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
> NOT doing you any favors.
>

Me, I don't know who/what is a troll or spammer or time-waster.

All I know is that there are a huge number of guys out on these groups
that are willing to take the time to examine the problems that we pose
and provide useful help. Good help can come from anyone.

And to them , I am well grateful.

Ed

Re: HTML Purifier

On 19/01/08 12:55, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> edwardzyang@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
> He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
> NOT doing you any favors.
>

Me, I don't know who/what is a troll or spammer or time-waster.

All I know is that there are a huge number of guys out on these groups
that are willing to take the time to examine the problems that we pose
and provide useful help. Good help can come from anyone.

And to them , I am well grateful.

Ed