Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
am 28.01.2008 04:56:16 von Michel
Is there any way to get .NET 3.5 in the drop-down list in the Windows XP IIS
Virtual Directory Settings? I'm seeng only 1.1 and 2.0 and that's it. VS2008
is able to use the built-in IIS, but I can't switch to a "real" IIS.
Just D.
Re: Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
am 28.01.2008 09:09:45 von Riki
Just D wrote:
> Is there any way to get .NET 3.5 in the drop-down list in the Windows
> XP IIS Virtual Directory Settings? I'm seeng only 1.1 and 2.0 and
> that's it. VS2008 is able to use the built-in IIS, but I can't switch
> to a "real" IIS.
> Just D.
By installing 3.5, you have updated 2.0 to run all the 3.5 code.
Therefore, in IIS, there is no need for 3.5, just use 2.0 and it will work.
--
Riki
Re: Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
am 28.01.2008 09:35:18 von Michel
Thanks, Riki!
You were absolutely right, I opened IIS and then the default file and it
worked.
Although, do you think if it makes sense to switch to VS2008 and .NET 3.5
form .NET 2.0 and VS2005? I guess VS2008 is pretty new and maybe it has some
hidden traps. On the other hand VS2005 is not ideal as well and some bugs
and improvements comparing to VS2003 are pretty annoying. What's your
personal opinion?
Thanks,
Just D.
"Riki" wrote in message
news:ekggnUYYIHA.6140@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Just D wrote:
>> Is there any way to get .NET 3.5 in the drop-down list in the Windows
>> XP IIS Virtual Directory Settings? I'm seeng only 1.1 and 2.0 and
>> that's it. VS2008 is able to use the built-in IIS, but I can't switch
>> to a "real" IIS.
>> Just D.
>
> By installing 3.5, you have updated 2.0 to run all the 3.5 code.
> Therefore, in IIS, there is no need for 3.5, just use 2.0 and it will
> work.
>
> --
>
> Riki
>
>
>
Re: Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
am 28.01.2008 13:44:18 von nomailreplies
re:
!> do you think it makes sense to switch to VS2008 and .NET 3.5 from .NET 2.0 and VS2005?
VS 2008 fixes many VS 2005 bugs, besides having a slew of new IDE and .NET 3.5 features.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en espaƱol : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"Just D" wrote in message news:zugnj.3517$4H1.3278@newsfe07.phx...
> Thanks, Riki!
>
> You were absolutely right, I opened IIS and then the default file and it worked.
>
> Although, do you think if it makes sense to switch to VS2008 and .NET 3.5 form .NET 2.0 and VS2005? I guess VS2008 is
> pretty new and maybe it has some hidden traps. On the other hand VS2005 is not ideal as well and some bugs and
> improvements comparing to VS2003 are pretty annoying. What's your personal opinion?
>
> Thanks,
> Just D.
>
>
> "Riki" wrote in message news:ekggnUYYIHA.6140@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Just D wrote:
>>> Is there any way to get .NET 3.5 in the drop-down list in the Windows
>>> XP IIS Virtual Directory Settings? I'm seeng only 1.1 and 2.0 and
>>> that's it. VS2008 is able to use the built-in IIS, but I can't switch
>>> to a "real" IIS.
>>> Just D.
>>
>> By installing 3.5, you have updated 2.0 to run all the 3.5 code.
>> Therefore, in IIS, there is no need for 3.5, just use 2.0 and it will work.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Riki
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
am 28.01.2008 14:34:05 von Riki
VS2008 is much better for using style sheets and for debugging JavaScript.
On an older computer however, it is significantly slower.
Riki
Just D wrote:
> Thanks, Riki!
>
> You were absolutely right, I opened IIS and then the default file and
> it worked.
>
> Although, do you think if it makes sense to switch to VS2008 and .NET
> 3.5 form .NET 2.0 and VS2005? I guess VS2008 is pretty new and maybe
> it has some hidden traps. On the other hand VS2005 is not ideal as
> well and some bugs and improvements comparing to VS2003 are pretty
> annoying. What's your personal opinion?
>
> Thanks,
> Just D.
>
>
> "Riki" wrote in message
> news:ekggnUYYIHA.6140@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Just D wrote:
>>> Is there any way to get .NET 3.5 in the drop-down list in the
>>> Windows XP IIS Virtual Directory Settings? I'm seeng only 1.1 and
>>> 2.0 and that's it. VS2008 is able to use the built-in IIS, but I
>>> can't switch to a "real" IIS.
>>> Just D.
>>
>> By installing 3.5, you have updated 2.0 to run all the 3.5 code.
>> Therefore, in IIS, there is no need for 3.5, just use 2.0 and it will
>> work.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Riki
--
Riki
Re: Windows XP Pro, IIS and .NET 3.0/3.5
am 28.01.2008 14:43:12 von mark
"Juan T. Llibre" wrote in message
news:OM3tAuaYIHA.4272@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> re:
> !> do you think it makes sense to switch to VS2008 and .NET 3.5 from .NET
> 2.0 and VS2005?
>
> VS 2008 fixes many VS 2005 bugs, besides having a slew of new IDE and .NET
> 3.5 features.
And LINQ, which is (IMO) a good enough reason to upgrade on its own...
Not to mention the native AJAX support...
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net