New "80s Show

New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 11:25:14 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 12:44:17 von Leythos

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> The
> producer of this show KNOWS that I will move
> HEAVEN AND EARTH to make it harder to
> workplaces to block out my show.

Which continues to prove that you are an unethical ass-hole.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 13:25:59 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 15:32:00 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 17:57:10 von Leythos

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> "Leythos" wrote in message
> news:MPG.2208db987482c869899eb@Adfree.usenet.com...
> > In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> >> The
> >> producer of this show KNOWS that I will move
> >> HEAVEN AND EARTH to make it harder to
> >> workplaces to block out my show.
> >
> > Which continues to prove that you are an unethical ass-hole.
>
> Well, the producer has no problem with what I do. He
> KNOWS that the more people that tune in, the more
> money he will make from sponsors.

Well, that means you and the producer are unethical, and that's fine,
since you accept being an unethical person, only concerned with your own
wealth and not with doing the right thing.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 18:54:21 von gary

Your proxy hijinks, while mildly entertaining, are a bit off topic.
Although web, application, and streaming proxy servers are discussed here,
perhaps this particular thread is more appropriate to alt.internet.radio
or one of the many Net radio fora like http://forums.live365.com

-Gary

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 20:49:08 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 21:55:14 von comphelp

"Chilly8" writes:

> That sponsors that advertise on the show want their most
> for thier money, and they want their message heard. The
> sponsors want their message heard. And in these tough
> economic times, sponsors want more from their their
> money, when it comes to running ads, so I oblige
> both the producer and the advertisers to make sure that
> the the money that is paid to the producers gets the most
> results.

And the road to hell is paved with such "good" intentions.

I'm just sayin.

Best Regards,
--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 23:08:54 von Leythos

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> And in these tough
> economic times, sponsors want more from their their
> money, when it comes to running ads, so I oblige
> both the producer and the advertisers to make sure that
> the the money that is paid to the producers gets the most
> results.

And evil doers always have an excuse, like you do, "tough economic
times" does not justify unethical actions, except for corrupt people
that have no ethics.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New "80s Show

am 29.01.2008 23:50:37 von Sebastian Gottschalk

Todd H. wrote:


>> both the producer and the advertisers to make sure that
>> the the money that is paid to the producers gets the most
>> results.
>
> And the road to hell is paved with such "good" intentions.


Since when is advertisement a good intention?

Re: New "80s Show

am 30.01.2008 00:37:29 von comphelp

"Sebastian G." writes:

> Todd H. wrote:
>
>
> >> both the producer and the advertisers to make sure that
> >> the the money that is paid to the producers gets the most
> >> results.
> > And the road to hell is paved with such "good" intentions.
>
>
> Since when is advertisement a good intention?

Oh the advertisers and spammers _always_ seem to think they're
spreading good and valuable that the public just won't know about
otherwise!

It's all marketing crap of course, usually for stuff that people don't
need and won't improve their lives one iota.

--
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/

Re: New "80s Show

am 30.01.2008 07:58:37 von unknown

Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)

Re: New "80s Show

am 30.01.2008 09:48:11 von Leythos

In article , chilly8@hotmail.com says...
> Beucase I have
> the Shoutcast server running on a port other than 8000,
> it is available in more workplaces.

Except, again, on 8000 or 80 or 443, your service would not be
accessible from any properly configured firewall in any company that
cared.

Nothing you've posed in the few years I've seen your posts shows you as
anything except an unethical business person with very limited knowledge
of anything related to the internet or networking or security.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Re: New "80s Show

am 31.01.2008 20:07:15 von chilly8

X-No-Archive: Yes

I just formally welcomed his show to the lineup. Given rhe
results of the web logs, and connect attempts made through
php and cgi proxy installations all over the globe, I have
a show in the lineup that could really reel in the listeners.

Most of the phpProxy sites are hosted on server farms that
cater to business users, so blocking anything from these
server farms could also cut off business-related sites
as well. This is why most phpProxy operators do this,
to make it more difficult for businesses to block them
without resorting to expensive filtering software. No
business in their right mind is going to block access to
work-related sites just to block proxy sites.

Re: New "80s Show

am 31.01.2008 22:58:18 von Sebastian Gottschalk

Chilly8 wrote:


> Most of the phpProxy sites are hosted on server farms that
> cater to business users, so blocking anything from these
> server farms could also cut off business-related sites
> as well.


Bullshit.

> This is why most phpProxy operators do this,
> to make it more difficult for businesses to block them
> without resorting to expensive filtering software.


And the bullshit continues...

> No business in their right mind is going to block access to
> work-related sites just to block proxy sites.


And there' no reason why they should do so.

Re: New "80s Show

am 01.02.2008 01:20:14 von chilly8

X-No-Archive: Yes

"Sebastian G." wrote in message
news:60euj7F1q45tcU1@mid.dfncis.de...
> Chilly8 wrote:
>
>
>> Most of the phpProxy sites are hosted on server farms that
>> cater to business users, so blocking anything from these
>> server farms could also cut off business-related sites
>> as well.
>
>
> Bullshit.
>
>> This is why most phpProxy operators do this,
>> to make it more difficult for businesses to block them
>> without resorting to expensive filtering software.
>
>
> And the bullshit continues...
>
>> No business in their right mind is going to block access to
>> work-related sites just to block proxy sites.
>
>
> And there' no reason why they should do so.

This is one thing that is going to make swiss cheese
out of Australia's proposed Internet censorship regime.
More affluent Australians can simply put their own
server in a colocation facility outside of Australia,
and then use that to surf the Net, and the Australian
authorities will have no idea what they are up to.
Packages start for as little as 200 AUD per month.
Just access your server with Windows Remote Desktop
and start surfing and the authorities in Australia won't
know what you are up to. They would know you were
connecting to a network on a server farm somewhere,
but would not know where you were going beyond
that server.

Simply put, affluent Australians will be able to circumvent
the filtering regime by placing their own server at
colocation facilities outside of Australia, and using
those to surf the Net. ISP-level filtering in Australia
will only hurt the poor, while the rich will just
simply be able to put their own servers in colocation
facilities outside of Australia and surf wherever they
want.