More Form Mail Replies - OT

Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
answers:


==From: so, if this isn't used - do you read it? ;-)
==hello - testing, 2, 3 ;-)
==I don't need to try and break it, right? Just see if it works for
regular non-hackers?

You can't break it.
The "from" is used basically as a handle.


==From: m.barnard@
==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return help
given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
==Mike.

Thanks, Mike.


==From: m.barnard@thunderin.co.uk
==My only comment is...
==When the mail has been sent it just leaves me with a black page and
nowhere to go. Buttons redirecting you to the home page maybe?
==In fact, could you do the same for me?
==www.thermachek.com/
==The link is in the left menu. Thanks.
==Mike.

I've implimented something new in the area of which you speak. See how
you like it.


==From: tobyinkster
==hellooooo

Thanks, Toby


==From: edbj@
==Good day, mail form,
==This is a test.
==Ed

Good day, Ed.


==From: foo@bar.com%0ACc:lws4art@centralva.net

Nice "From" line, Foo. Oh the humanities.

==You did test for email injection, right?

Don't have to. And you _should_ know why.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On Apr 1, 5:28 pm, Neredbojias fliam.php> wrote:

Today's nude( Apr 2) looks like she just got out of Auschwitz

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On 02 Apr 2008, Travis Newbury wrote:

> Today's nude( Apr 2) looks like she just got out of Auschwitz

Maybe she's going for that concentration camp look. You know women...

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

Neredbojias wrote:
> Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
> answers:

>
> ==From: m.barnard@
> ==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return help
> given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
> ==Mike.
>
> Thanks, Mike.
>
>
> ==From: m.barnard@[actual unmunged email address].uk

Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail address
to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either rude or
carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in future.


--
John
Don't make me come over there

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On 02 Apr 2008, John Hosking wrote:

> Neredbojias wrote:
>> Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
>> answers:
>
>>
>> ==From: m.barnard@
>> ==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return
>> help given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
>> ==Mike.
>>
>> Thanks, Mike.
>>
>>
>> ==From: m.barnard@[actual unmunged email address].uk
>
> Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
> From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail
> address to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either
> rude or carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in
> future.

Damn, I edited it in his first message and missed the second. Sorry,
Mike.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:59:27 +0000 (UTC), Neredbojias
wrote:

>On 02 Apr 2008, John Hosking wrote:
>
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>> Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
>>> answers:
>>
>>>
>>> ==From: m.barnard@
>>> ==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return
>>> help given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
>>> ==Mike.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Mike.
>>>
>>>
>>> ==From: m.barnard@[actual unmunged email address].uk
>>
>> Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
>> From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail
>> address to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either
>> rude or carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in
>> future.
>
>Damn, I edited it in his first message and missed the second. Sorry,
>Mike.

Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used
my commonest.

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

Mike Barnard wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:59:27 +0000 (UTC), Neredbojias
> wrote:
>
>>On 02 Apr 2008, John Hosking wrote:
>>
>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>> Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
>>>> answers:
>>>
>>>
>>>> ==From: m.barnard@
>>>> ==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return
>>>> help given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
>>>> ==Mike.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Mike.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ==From: m.barnard@[actual unmunged email address].uk
>>>
>>> Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
>>> From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail
>>> address to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either
>>> rude or carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in
>>> future.
>>
>>Damn, I edited it in his first message and missed the second. Sorry,
>>Mike.
>
> Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used my
> commonest.

Holy crap on a stick. That's a lot of addresses. :)

I wonder how many the average Joe or Jane in her might have.

I'll start.

Blinky - probably 20 at most. Most I rarely use.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:24:52 -0700, Blinky the Shark
wrote:

>Mike Barnard wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:59:27 +0000 (UTC), Neredbojias
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 02 Apr 2008, John Hosking wrote:
>>>
>>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>>> Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
>>>>> answers:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ==From: m.barnard@
>>>>> ==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return
>>>>> help given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
>>>>> ==Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==From: m.barnard@[actual unmunged email address].uk
>>>>
>>>> Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
>>>> From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail
>>>> address to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either
>>>> rude or carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in
>>>> future.
>>>
>>>Damn, I edited it in his first message and missed the second. Sorry,
>>>Mike.
>>
>> Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used my
>> commonest.
>
>Holy crap on a stick. That's a lot of addresses. :)
>
>I wonder how many the average Joe or Jane in her might have.
>
>I'll start.
>
>Blinky - probably 20 at most. Most I rarely use.

Well, as I own a domain, well, two now, every time I register with a
website or go somewhere that wants an address, I make a new one. If
your imaginary website "i-site.com" wanted me to give an email address
to register then it would be i-site@mydomain.com. Then, if I get spam
I can be reasonably sure where the address was harvested. I can delete
the address if it get's bothersome without much bother. This way I've
built up loads of addresses. Most never get much use.

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:24:52 -0700, Blinky the Shark writ:

>> Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used my
>> commonest.
>
> Holy crap on a stick. That's a lot of addresses.
>
> I wonder how many the average Joe or Jane in her might have.
>
> I'll start.
>
> Blinky - probably 20 at most. Most I rarely use.

Thunderbird hits seven at a time. Those I use. I also have an old Yahoo
addy that never gets used. My MSN addy finally got "cancelled" or whatever.

One gmail for personal contacts, one gmail for online forms, ordering,
business stuff. Two from ISP that I never give out any more but some
people still use for me. One each for three domains. Plenty.

I can't imagine a need for any more than the seven I check/use regularly.

--
"Because all you of Earth are idiots!"
¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·-> freemont© <-·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

Mike Barnard wrote:

> On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 16:24:52 -0700, Blinky the Shark
> wrote:
>
>>Mike Barnard wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:59:27 +0000 (UTC), Neredbojias
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 02 Apr 2008, John Hosking wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>>>>> Here's some more interesting replies to the form mail thing with my
>>>>>> answers:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ==From: m.barnard@
>>>>>> ==Here's a test just as you asked. I get so little chance to return
>>>>>> help given. Think this makes up for the last month of "How do I"?
>>>>>> ==Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==From: m.barnard@[actual unmunged email address].uk
>>>>>
>>>>> Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
>>>>> From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail
>>>>> address to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either
>>>>> rude or carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in
>>>>> future.
>>>>
>>>>Damn, I edited it in his first message and missed the second. Sorry,
>>>>Mike.
>>>
>>> Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used
>>> my commonest.
>>
>>Holy crap on a stick. That's a lot of addresses. :)
>>
>>I wonder how many the average Joe or Jane in her might have.
>>
>>I'll start.
>>
>>Blinky - probably 20 at most. Most I rarely use.
>
> Well, as I own a domain, well, two now, every time I register with a

I own five. But only three are in use. But anyway, I forgot fifteen or
twenty I have at sneakemail.com.

> website or go somewhere that wants an address, I make a new one. If your
> imaginary website "i-site.com" wanted me to give an email address to
> register then it would be i-site@mydomain.com. Then, if I get spam I can
> be reasonably sure where the address was harvested. I can delete the
> address if it get's bothersome without much bother. This way I've built
> up loads of addresses. Most never get much use.

Gotcha. Isolating where spammers got your address is a strong feature at
sneakemail.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On 06 Apr 2008, Mike Barnard wrote:

>>> Neredbojias, you said you weren't going to use what was typed in the
>>> From: field, but here you've gone and posted the fellow's e-mail
>>> address to Usenet. I hope Mike doesn't mind, but I think it's either
>>> rude or carelss of you. Either way, I suggest you take more care in
>>> future.
>>
>>Damn, I edited it in his first message and missed the second. Sorry,
>>Mike.
>
> Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used
> my commonest.

Hope it wasn't your fav. I notice that it's similar to the one you use
here.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

On 06 Apr 2008, Mike Barnard wrote:

>>Holy crap on a stick. That's a lot of addresses. :)
>>
>>I wonder how many the average Joe or Jane in her might have.
>>
>>I'll start.
>>
>>Blinky - probably 20 at most. Most I rarely use.
>
> Well, as I own a domain, well, two now, every time I register with a
> website or go somewhere that wants an address, I make a new one. If
> your imaginary website "i-site.com" wanted me to give an email address
> to register then it would be i-site@mydomain.com. Then, if I get spam
> I can be reasonably sure where the address was harvested. I can delete
> the address if it get's bothersome without much bother. This way I've
> built up loads of addresses. Most never get much use.

That sounds like a damn good idea! I think I will start doin' something
like that myself.

--
Neredbojias
http://www.neredbojias.com/
Great sights and sounds

Re: More Form Mail Replies - OT

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Mike Barnard wrote:
>

>> Easily done. I've about 200 email address' to choose from and I used my
>> commonest.
>
> Holy crap on a stick. That's a lot of addresses. :)
>
> I wonder how many the average Joe or Jane in her might have.
>
> I'll start.
>
> Blinky - probably 20 at most. Most I rarely use.

I've currently got six, not counting the stupid, fake, munged one I use
here.


--
John
Fear is the mind-killer.