The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
mvn rat:check
This seems to be because its plugin is under
than under
But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
If so, does the config need to be in both?
Can anyone advise?
Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
Please unsubscribe me from this list - I have tried twice - still
getting emails. Thank you!
-----Original Message-----
From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:49 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Cactus RAT report - where to add plugin in pom.xml?
The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
mvn rat:check
This seems to be because its plugin is under
than under
But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
If so, does the config need to be in both?
Can anyone advise?
Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
______________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia=
l. If you are not the=20
intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do =
not disclose,=20
distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender im=
mediately. In addition,=20
please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to arch=
iving and review by=20
persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
_____________
------=_Part_2838_24376787.1207157172776
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
In my opinion the rat plugin should be specified in the build section.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, sebb
> The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
>
> mvn rat:check
>
> This seems to be because its plugin is under
> than under
>
> But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
> If so, does the config need to be in both?
>
> Can anyone advise?
>
> Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
> to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
Regards, Petar!
Karlovo, Bulgaria.
EOOXML objections
http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
Public PGP Key at:
http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53 B761500F9
Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
------=_Part_2838_24376787.1207157172776--
OK, done
On 02/04/2008, Petar Tahchiev
> In my opinion the rat plugin should be specified in the build section.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, sebb
>
> > The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
> >
> > mvn rat:check
> >
> > This seems to be because its plugin is under
> > than under
> >
> > But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
> > If so, does the config need to be in both?
> >
> > Can anyone advise?
> >
> > Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
> > to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
> >
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards, Petar!
> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>
> EOOXML objections
> http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>
> Public PGP Key at:
> http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53 B761500F9
> Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
>
sebb wrote:
> The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
>
> mvn rat:check
>
> This seems to be because its plugin is under
> than under
>
> But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
> If so, does the config need to be in both?
>
> Can anyone advise?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/usage.html
> Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
> to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
On 02/04/2008, Dennis Lundberg
> sebb wrote:
> > The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
> >
> > mvn rat:check
> >
> > This seems to be because its plugin is under
> > than under
> >
> > But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
> > If so, does the config need to be in both?
> >
> > Can anyone advise?
>
>
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/usage.html
>
Thanks, already done.
Does the plugin also need to be mentioned in dependencyManagement?
BTW, why is it rat-maven-plugin and not maven-rat-plugin like most of
the others seem to be? [The only other one I've seen with
maven-middle-position is jdepend]
>
> > Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
> > to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dennis Lundberg
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
sebb wrote:
> On 02/04/2008, Dennis Lundberg
>> sebb wrote:
>> > The RAT report does not seem to be found if I run
>> >
>> > mvn rat:check
>> >
>> > This seems to be because its plugin is under
>> > than under
>> >
>> > But I don't know much about Maven, so maybe it needs to be in both?
>> > If so, does the config need to be in both?
>> >
>> > Can anyone advise?
>>
>>
>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/usage.html
>>
>
> Thanks, already done.
>
> Does the plugin also need to be mentioned in dependencyManagement?
No, dependencyManagement is a place where you can define which versions
you want to use for a bunch of dependencies, without actually decalring
them as dependencies. It works something like this:
"if this pom or any child pom want to use dependency A, make sure that
they all use version X"
> BTW, why is it rat-maven-plugin and not maven-rat-plugin like most of
> the others seem to be? [The only other one I've seen with
> maven-middle-position is jdepend]
All the plugins at the mojo project [1] at Codehaus use this naming
convention to distinguish them from the official Maven plugins provided
by the ASF. rat-maven-plugin is a Codehaus plugin but maven-site-plugin
is an ASF plugin.
[1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/
>> > Once it's in the correct place(s), there are some exceptions that need
>> > to be added, e.g. MANIFEST.MF. I can add those.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Dennis Lundberg
--
Dennis Lundberg