Fwd: Apache2::Reload

Fwd: Apache2::Reload

am 18.08.2009 14:51:18 von Ryan Gies

Howdy, as I have not received a response from dev at perl.apache.org I'm
thinking that was not the correct recipient. I just have a patch for
Apache2::Reload and want to know where to send it...

Cheers,
-Ryan

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Apache2::Reload
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:21 -0400
From: Ryan Gies
Organization: Livesite Netwoks, LLC
To: dev@perl.apache.org


I have a patch for Apache2::Reload which does two things:

a) ignores require-hooks which exist in %INC (fix)
b) reloads by file, not module name (fix?)

I consider both of these fixes, however b) is a behavior change and
would like to discuss this with someone before finishing the doc
comments and sending upstream.

Am I writing to the correct group and does anyone have want to take
this on (I expect it to be quick)?

Cheers,
-Ryan

Re: Apache2::Reload

am 18.08.2009 19:43:31 von Fred Moyer

That's the correct address; I didn't see an email there though.

Suggest you repost your email to dev@perl.apache.org with the patch
inline in the email.

You need to be subscribed to dev@perl.apache.org to post there.

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Ryan Gies wrote:
> Howdy, as I have not received a response from dev at perl.apache.org I'm
> thinking that was not the correct recipient. =A0I just have a patch for
> Apache2::Reload and want to know where to send it...
>
> Cheers,
> -Ryan
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Apache2::Reload
> Date: =A0 Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:21 -0400
> From: =A0 Ryan Gies
> Organization: =A0 Livesite Netwoks, LLC
> To: =A0 =A0 dev@perl.apache.org
>
>
> I have a patch for Apache2::Reload which does two things:
>
> =A0a) ignores require-hooks which exist in %INC (fix)
> =A0b) reloads by file, not module name (fix?)
>
> I consider both of these fixes, however b) is a behavior change and
> would like to discuss this with someone before finishing the doc
> comments and sending upstream.
>
> Am I writing to the correct group and does anyone have want to take
> this on (I expect it to be quick)?
>
> Cheers,
> -Ryan
>
>