Apache 2.0.63 log timestamps

------_=_NextPart_001_01CA30DC.3F073A98
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,
I'm new to the list-hello. I just wanted to ask you guys a question to
see if you might know "off the top" - Does anyone remember anything
about there being a known bug in Apache 2.0.63 that causes access log
timestamps to be out of order? A colleague mentioned this behavior, but
I have not been able to reproduce it. Any feedback would be welcome.
Thanks all.

Thanks,

Justin Amburn=20




------_=_NextPart_001_01CA30DC.3F073A98
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




charset=3Dus-ascii">
6.5.7651.59">

SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Hi all,

FACE=3D"Arial">  LANG=3D"en-us"> I LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">’ LANG=3D"en-us">m new to the =
list SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">— LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">hello. I just wanted to ask you guys a question to see if =
you might know LANG=3D"en-us"> “ LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">off the top LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">” LANG=3D"en-us"> LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">– LANG=3D"en-us"> Does anyone remember =
anything about there being a known bug in Apache 2.0.63 that causes =
access log timestamps to be LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">out of order? LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">A colleague mentioned this behavior, but I have not been =
able to reproduce it. Any feedback would be welcome. Thanks =
all. LANG=3D"en-us">

LANG=3D"en-us"> LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">Thanks, LANG=3D"en-us">

LANG=3D"en-us"> FACE=3D"Arial">Justin Amburn

LANG=3D"en-us">

Re: Apache 2.0.63 log timestamps

Justin Amburn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m new to the list—hello. I just wanted to ask you guys a question to
> see if you might know “off the top” – Does anyone remember anything
> about there being a known bug in Apache 2.0.63 that causes access log
> timestamps to be out of order? A colleague mentioned this behavior, but
> I have not been able to reproduce it. Any feedback would be welcome.

Not a bug; behavior is by design. The timestamp is the moment the request
was received; it is logged upon completion.

------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

RE: Apache 2.0.63 log timestamps

Thanks for the reply William.

Justin=20

-----Original Message-----
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 4:45 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0.63 log timestamps

Justin Amburn wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> I'm new to the list-hello. I just wanted to ask you guys a question
to
> see if you might know "off the top" - Does anyone remember anything
> about there being a known bug in Apache 2.0.63 that causes access log
> timestamps to be out of order? A colleague mentioned this behavior,
but
> I have not been able to reproduce it. Any feedback would be welcome.

Not a bug; behavior is by design. The timestamp is the moment the
request
was received; it is logged upon completion.

------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org


------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org