from what you all stated, does it mean mod_perl is really outmoded comparing to Java?
Here Java programmer is cheaper than mod_perl developer.
But if mp can get better performance, we may consider it as first choice.
Regards,
Jeff.
I wonder if this will still be the case with Parrot and Perl 6?
I've read up on it a bit and with being able to compile multiple
languages exposing their libraries to each other it would seem more
programmers might be tempted into using Perl because of it's massive
library base.
What are the plans for mod_perl with perl 6?
Thanks,
Boysenberry Payne
On Sep 16, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Jeff Peng wrote:
> from what you all stated, does it mean mod_perl is really outmoded
> comparing to Java?
> Here Java programmer is cheaper than mod_perl developer.
> But if mp can get better performance, we may consider it as first
> choice.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff.
Jeff Horwitz is working on mod_parrot and mod_perl6
mod_parrot info:
http://www.parrot.org/mod_parrot
Jeffs blog:
http://www.smashing.org/jeff/
It's coming along, but currently it's tough to actually do much that's
useful without things like DBI, or Apache::Request. at least that's
where it was at YAPC.
Adam
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
> I wonder if this will still be the case with Parrot and Perl 6?
> I've read up on it a bit and with being able to compile multiple
> languages exposing their libraries to each other it would seem more
> programmers might be tempted into using Perl because of it's massive
> library base.
> What are the plans for mod_perl with perl 6?
>
> Thanks,
> Boysenberry Payne
>
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 9:31 PM, Jeff Peng wrote:
>
>> from what you all stated, does it mean mod_perl is really outmoded
>> comparing to Java?
>> Here Java programmer is cheaper than mod_perl developer.
>> But if mp can get better performance, we may consider it as first choice.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jeff.
>