relationship btw. socket_keepalive and socket_timeout

relationship btw. socket_keepalive and socket_timeout

am 19.10.2009 10:46:31 von thomas2004

Can I set a worker to use both of these properties or just one? I mean if I
use the socket_keepalive=true, is it meaningful to add property
socket_timeout=300?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/relationship-btw.-socket_keepalive-and -socket_timeout-tp25955021p25955021.html
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org

Re: relationship btw. socket_keepalive and socket_timeout

am 19.10.2009 12:04:29 von aw

thomas2004 wrote:
> Can I set a worker to use both of these properties or just one? I mean if I
> use the socket_keepalive=true, is it meaningful to add property
> socket_timeout=300?

Can you give us some idea of the context you are talking about ?
Apache httpd ? version ? mod_jk ? something else ?

------------------------------------------------------------ ---------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org