wake_up_interruptible
am 11.05.2010 22:32:46 von Fundu
Hi,
what happen when you call wake_up_interruptible and there are no task waiting on that wait queue right then.
But say after some time a task comes along and start waiting (after the wake_up_interruptible is called).
Would that task be not wait at all because there was a pending wake up
What i'm looking for is a mechanism where by any old wake if not acted upon are lost. so in the above mention case if a task come along and waits after a wake has been sent, it continues to wait until a next wake up is sent.
feel free to ask me if there is some more clarification required.
TIA
fundu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
Re: wake_up_interruptible
am 12.05.2010 09:35:09 von m.nazarewicz
On Tue, 11 May 2010 22:32:46 +0200, Fundu wrote:
> what happen when you call wake_up_interruptible and there are no task=
waiting on that wait queue right then.
>
> But say after some time a task comes along and start waiting (after t=
he wake_up_interruptible is called).
> Would that task be not wait at all because there was a pending wake u=
p
It will be waiting for another wake up.
> What i'm looking for is a mechanism where by any old wake if not acte=
d upon are lost.
Semahore may be a good option.
--=20
Best regards, _ _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=3D./ `o
| Computer Science, MichaÅ "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)-- Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie"=
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs