open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails

Hi,

I've got a problem using open_dev_excl() in reshape_container(), it fai=
ls. This functions goes down
and calls open() with flags O_DIRECT| O_RDWR| O_EXCL.
It fails in reshape_container(), ealier in Grow_reshape() exactly the s=
ame test call to open_dev_excl() succeed.=20
Between test open and open in reshape_container() there is no other ope=
n() performed (or other i/o operation that can cause problem).
It not depends on mdmon action because it is the same for raid5 and rai=
d0.
=46unction open_dev() works, and I'm using it as workaround.

In man pages for open() is told that O_EXCL flag should be used with O_=
CREAT flag only.
I've read in manual for open() also: "If O_EXCL is set and O_CREAT is n=
ot set, the result is undefined"
This can explain my experiences, about open_dev_excl() results.

Please let me know if above is right? What tell you your tests?

If mdadm needs some locking mechanism, probably we should use F_SETLK/F=
_GETLK i.e.:
int fd =3D open("/dev/name", );

/* To lock the file/device */
=20
struct flock fl =3D { F_WRLCK, SEEK_SET, 0, 0, 0 };
fl.l_pid =3D getpid();
fcntl(ld, F_SETLK, &fl);

...

/ * To unlock the file/device */

struct flock fl =3D { F_UNLCK, SEEK_SET, 0, 0, 0 };
fl.l_pid =3D getpid();
fcntl(ld, F_SETLK, &fl);
=20
...

close(fd);

Please tell me your opinion, because I think we have got a problem.

BR
Adam


------------------------------------------------------------ -
Intel Technology Poland Sp. z o.o.
email: adam.kwolek@intel.com   
phone: +48 58 766 1773


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i=
n
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails

2011/1/13 Kwolek, Adam :
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem using open_dev_excl() in reshape_container(), it fails. This functions goes down
> and calls open() with flags O_DIRECT| O_RDWR| O_EXCL.
> It fails in reshape_container(), ealier in Grow_reshape() exactly the same test call to open_dev_excl() succeed.
> Between test open and open in reshape_container() there is no other open() performed (or other i/o operation that can cause problem).
> It not depends on mdmon action because it is the same for raid5 and raid0.
> Function open_dev() works, and I'm using it as workaround.
>
> In man pages for open() is told that O_EXCL flag should be used with O_CREAT flag only.
> I've read in manual for open() also: "If O_EXCL is set and O_CREAT is not set, the result is undefined"

Right, it is undefined with respect to Posix, but for Linux O_EXCL on
a block device without O_CREAT is defined to bd_claim the block
device.

http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/open.2 .html

The second call to open_dev_excl is a bug, by definition you can't
exclusive open twice. Can you reuse the fd established in
Grow_reshape?

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Dan Williams
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:28 PM
> To: Kwolek, Adam
> Cc: neilb@suse.de; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Neubauer, Wojciech;
> Ciechanowski, Ed
> Subject: Re: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails
>
> 2011/1/13 Kwolek, Adam :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a problem using open_dev_excl() in reshape_container(), it
> fails. This functions goes down
> > and calls open() with flags O_DIRECT| O_RDWR| O_EXCL.
> > It fails in reshape_container(), ealier in Grow_reshape() exactly the
> same test call to open_dev_excl() succeed.
> > Between test open and open in reshape_container() there is no other
> open() performed (or other i/o operation that can cause problem).
> > It not depends on mdmon action because it is the same for raid5 and
> raid0.
> > Function open_dev() works, and I'm using it as workaround.
> >
> > In man pages for open() is told that O_EXCL flag should be used with
> O_CREAT flag only.
> > I've read in manual for open() also: "If O_EXCL is set and O_CREAT is
> not set, the result is undefined"
>
> Right, it is undefined with respect to Posix, but for Linux O_EXCL on
> a block device without O_CREAT is defined to bd_claim the block
> device.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/open.2 .html
>
> The second call to open_dev_excl is a bug, by definition you can't
> exclusive open twice. Can you reuse the fd established in
> Grow_reshape?
>
> --
> Dan

There is no second open. My test call to open_dev_excl() is closed at once ;),
and it is used to detect where I can successfully open device and if there is any duplicated open.
There is no other open that can block open_dev_excl() in reshape_container() (when monitor is absent also),
or I was unable to find it.
Handle cannot be reused, because in Grow_reshape() container is opened and in reshape_container() all arrays
Are opened one by one.

BR
Adam

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails

Hi,

I think I've found problem root cause.
As I'm working on "Online Capacity Expansion", my tests uses mounted arrays - this is in conflict with open_dev_ext()
and fails this function. Evrything is ok This means that reshape operation cannot be performed online (or this is valid on my system only?).

I do not know why on begin (in main() of mdadm.c) this function can succeed and later not (later system blocks array ?).
More, when I've made some open_dev_exe()+close() earlier, it works later also (please look used code below/treat patch as demo/).

Summarizing problem is related to mounted arrays only.

BR
Adam


From cf545d2ffb906096da89aff7b1a5c5830221cc4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Kwolek
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:11:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ADK: open workaround 2


Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek
---
Grow.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
mdadm.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
index 763287b..3b37f97 100644
--- a/Grow.c
+++ b/Grow.c
@@ -1285,6 +1285,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,

struct mdinfo info;
struct mdinfo *sra;
+//adk
+ int fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
+ if (fd_test >= 0)
+ close(fd_test);

if (ioctl(fd, GET_ARRAY_INFO, &array) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, Name ": %s is not an active md array - aborting\n",
@@ -1319,6 +1323,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
" beyond %d\n", st->max_devs);
return 1;
}
+//adk
+ fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
+ if (fd_test >= 0)
+ close(fd_test);

/* in the external case we need to check that the requested reshape is
* supported, and perform an initial check that the container holds the
@@ -1394,6 +1402,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
" be reshaped\n", devname);
return 1;
}
+//adk
+ fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
+ if (fd_test >= 0)
+ close(fd_test);

/* ========= set size =============== */
if (size >= 0 && (size == 0 || size != array.size)) {
@@ -1462,6 +1474,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
goto release;
}
}
+//adk
+ fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
+ if (fd_test >= 0)
+ close(fd_test);

info.array = array;
sysfs_init(&info, fd, NoMdDev);
@@ -1545,6 +1561,7 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
* number of devices (On-Line Capacity Expansion) must be
* performed at the level of the container
*/
+
rv = reshape_container(container, fd, devname, st, &info,
force, backup_file, quiet);
frozen = 0;
diff --git a/mdadm.c b/mdadm.c
index 2ffe94f..bc9d34e 100644
--- a/mdadm.c
+++ b/mdadm.c
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ident.name[0] = 0;
ident.container = NULL;
ident.member = NULL;
+//adk - can open

while ((option_index = -1) ,
(opt=getopt_long(argc, argv,
@@ -134,6 +135,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
&option_index)) != -1) {
int newmode = mode;
/* firstly, some mode-independent options */
+//adk
+ int fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
+ if (fd_test >= 0)
+ close(fd_test);
+
switch(opt) {
case HelpOptions:
print_help = 2;
@@ -1115,6 +1121,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
exit(2);
}
if (mode == MANAGE || mode == GROW) {
+//adk
+ int fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
+ if (fd_test >= 0)
+ close(fd_test);
+
mdfd = open_mddev(devlist->devname, 1);
if (mdfd < 0)
exit(1);
--
1.6.0.2




> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kwolek, Adam
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 8:32 AM
> To: Williams, Dan J
> Cc: neilb@suse.de; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Neubauer, Wojciech;
> Ciechanowski, Ed
> Subject: RE: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Dan Williams
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:28 PM
> > To: Kwolek, Adam
> > Cc: neilb@suse.de; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org; Neubauer, Wojciech;
> > Ciechanowski, Ed
> > Subject: Re: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails
> >
> > 2011/1/13 Kwolek, Adam :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've got a problem using open_dev_excl() in reshape_container(), it
> > fails. This functions goes down
> > > and calls open() with flags O_DIRECT| O_RDWR| O_EXCL.
> > > It fails in reshape_container(), ealier in Grow_reshape() exactly
> the
> > same test call to open_dev_excl() succeed.
> > > Between test open and open in reshape_container() there is no other
> > open() performed (or other i/o operation that can cause problem).
> > > It not depends on mdmon action because it is the same for raid5 and
> > raid0.
> > > Function open_dev() works, and I'm using it as workaround.
> > >
> > > In man pages for open() is told that O_EXCL flag should be used
> with
> > O_CREAT flag only.
> > > I've read in manual for open() also: "If O_EXCL is set and O_CREAT
> is
> > not set, the result is undefined"
> >
> > Right, it is undefined with respect to Posix, but for Linux O_EXCL on
> > a block device without O_CREAT is defined to bd_claim the block
> > device.
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/open.2 .html
> >
> > The second call to open_dev_excl is a bug, by definition you can't
> > exclusive open twice. Can you reuse the fd established in
> > Grow_reshape?
> >
> > --
> > Dan
>
> There is no second open. My test call to open_dev_excl() is closed at
> once ;),
> and it is used to detect where I can successfully open device and if
> there is any duplicated open.
> There is no other open that can block open_dev_excl() in
> reshape_container() (when monitor is absent also),
> or I was unable to find it.
> Handle cannot be reused, because in Grow_reshape() container is opened
> and in reshape_container() all arrays
> Are opened one by one.
>
> BR
> Adam
>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
> > in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails

On 1/14/2011 2:36 AM, Kwolek, Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I've found problem root cause.
> As I'm working on "Online Capacity Expansion", my tests uses mounted arrays - this is in conflict with open_dev_ext()
> and fails this function. Evrything is ok This means that reshape operation cannot be performed online (or this is valid on my system only?).
>
> I do not know why on begin (in main() of mdadm.c) this function can succeed and later not (later system blocks array ?).
> More, when I've made some open_dev_exe()+close() earlier, it works later also (please look used code below/treat patch as demo/).
>
> Summarizing problem is related to mounted arrays only.

Why do we need an exclusive open on the subarrays, that defeats the
purpose of online capacity expansion? The exclusive open on the
container prevents new arrays from being created and other races, but I
do not see why we would need exclusive access to the subarray.

I would look at the code, but I am distracted by another firefight at
the moment.

--
Dan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: open_dev_excl in reshape_container() fails

On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:36:04 +0000 "Kwolek, Adam"
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think I've found problem root cause.
> As I'm working on "Online Capacity Expansion", my tests uses mounted arrays - this is in conflict with open_dev_ext()
> and fails this function. Evrything is ok This means that reshape operation cannot be performed online (or this is valid on my system only?).
>
> I do not know why on begin (in main() of mdadm.c) this function can succeed and later not (later system blocks array ?).
> More, when I've made some open_dev_exe()+close() earlier, it works later also (please look used code below/treat patch as demo/).
>
> Summarizing problem is related to mounted arrays only.

Thanks. I see what is wrong - it is OK to open containers exclusively, but
not arrays - as you say, that could be mounted.

I have applied your original patch to change open_dev_excl to open_dev now
that I understand what the issue is..

Thanks,

NeilBrown


>
> BR
> Adam
>
>
> >From cf545d2ffb906096da89aff7b1a5c5830221cc4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Adam Kwolek
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:11:19 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] ADK: open workaround 2
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek
> ---
> Grow.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> mdadm.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c
> index 763287b..3b37f97 100644
> --- a/Grow.c
> +++ b/Grow.c
> @@ -1285,6 +1285,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
>
> struct mdinfo info;
> struct mdinfo *sra;
> +//adk
> + int fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
> + if (fd_test >= 0)
> + close(fd_test);
>
> if (ioctl(fd, GET_ARRAY_INFO, &array) < 0) {
> fprintf(stderr, Name ": %s is not an active md array - aborting\n",
> @@ -1319,6 +1323,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
> " beyond %d\n", st->max_devs);
> return 1;
> }
> +//adk
> + fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
> + if (fd_test >= 0)
> + close(fd_test);
>
> /* in the external case we need to check that the requested reshape is
> * supported, and perform an initial check that the container holds the
> @@ -1394,6 +1402,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
> " be reshaped\n", devname);
> return 1;
> }
> +//adk
> + fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
> + if (fd_test >= 0)
> + close(fd_test);
>
> /* ========= set size =============== */
> if (size >= 0 && (size == 0 || size != array.size)) {
> @@ -1462,6 +1474,10 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
> goto release;
> }
> }
> +//adk
> + fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
> + if (fd_test >= 0)
> + close(fd_test);
>
> info.array = array;
> sysfs_init(&info, fd, NoMdDev);
> @@ -1545,6 +1561,7 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, int quiet, char *backup_file,
> * number of devices (On-Line Capacity Expansion) must be
> * performed at the level of the container
> */
> +
> rv = reshape_container(container, fd, devname, st, &info,
> force, backup_file, quiet);
> frozen = 0;
> diff --git a/mdadm.c b/mdadm.c
> index 2ffe94f..bc9d34e 100644
> --- a/mdadm.c
> +++ b/mdadm.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> ident.name[0] = 0;
> ident.container = NULL;
> ident.member = NULL;
> +//adk - can open
>
> while ((option_index = -1) ,
> (opt=getopt_long(argc, argv,
> @@ -134,6 +135,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> &option_index)) != -1) {
> int newmode = mode;
> /* firstly, some mode-independent options */
> +//adk
> + int fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
> + if (fd_test >= 0)
> + close(fd_test);
> +
> switch(opt) {
> case HelpOptions:
> print_help = 2;
> @@ -1115,6 +1121,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> exit(2);
> }
> if (mode == MANAGE || mode == GROW) {
> +//adk
> + int fd_test = open_dev_excl(126);
> + if (fd_test >= 0)
> + close(fd_test);
> +
> mdfd = open_mddev(devlist->devname, 1);
> if (mdfd < 0)
> exit(1);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html