GPT on MD raid

Hi - I was thinking of using a GPT partition on top of a MD raid device. It
occurs to me that because GPT also puts data at the end of the device, it
might get confused if the raid device is resized by adding more drives, etc.

Has anyone tried this? Should it work? How should the GPT header get moved
to the end of the raid device? Will parted fix it?

Should I ditch this idea and delve into the complexities of LVM?

Thanks

Jeremy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: GPT on MD raid

On 04/18/2011 12:11 PM, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
> Hi - I was thinking of using a GPT partition on top of a MD raid device. It
> occurs to me that because GPT also puts data at the end of the device, it
> might get confused if the raid device is resized by adding more drives, etc.
>
> Has anyone tried this? Should it work? How should the GPT header get moved
> to the end of the raid device? Will parted fix it?

I've parted fix cases of this in the past, but I don't know how robust it is.

> Should I ditch this idea and delve into the complexities of LVM?

Yes, in my not-entirely-humble opinion. I suspect you'll find LVM isn't all that complex, at least if all you are trying to do is replace GPT. And you get some serious advantages without extra effort, like non-contiguous volumes and snapshotting.

While my copy of gparted won't work with it, there are gui tools to manage LVM. I use kvpm on my gentoo/KDE laptop.

>
> Thanks

HTH,

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: GPT on MD raid

On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Jeremy Sanders wrote:

> Should I ditch this idea and delve into the complexities of LVM?

Yes. LVM isn't all that complex and a lot more flexible, plus you can do
"everything" online without having to unmount filesystems to re-partition.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: GPT on MD raid

--Sig_/m83AdQpyKGxvJLd.SnKg7jm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:11:56 +0100
Jeremy Sanders wrote:

> Hi - I was thinking of using a GPT partition on top of a MD raid device. =
It=20
> occurs to me that because GPT also puts data at the end of the device, it=
=20
> might get confused if the raid device is resized by adding more drives, e=
tc.
>=20
> Has anyone tried this? Should it work? How should the GPT header get move=
d=20
> to the end of the raid device? Will parted fix it?
>=20
> Should I ditch this idea and delve into the complexities of LVM?

I'd suggest that you reconsider if you really need to partition a single
mdraid device, or maybe it would be better to create several mdraid devices
(on regular partitions) for different needs, possibly with differing shapes
and settings. E.g. over the same set of disks I use three RAIDs, two small
arrays for boot and root FS, and the rest for data.

--=20
With respect,
Roman

--Sig_/m83AdQpyKGxvJLd.SnKg7jm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2scNcACgkQTLKSvz+PZwiMmACeO8rGBF3F8WS1++8MCmm5 cWLk
ORkAnjlAlUAjcAy39lNgPTlr/VltyTZx
=K11M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/m83AdQpyKGxvJLd.SnKg7jm--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: GPT on MD raid

On 18/04/11 17:47, Phil Turmel wrote:
> On 04/18/2011 12:11 PM, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
>> Hi - I was thinking of using a GPT partition on top of a MD raid device. It
>> occurs to me that because GPT also puts data at the end of the device, it
>> might get confused if the raid device is resized by adding more drives, etc.
>>
>> Has anyone tried this? Should it work? How should the GPT header get moved
>> to the end of the raid device? Will parted fix it?
>
> I've parted fix cases of this in the past, but I don't know how robust it is.
>
>> Should I ditch this idea and delve into the complexities of LVM?
>
> Yes, in my not-entirely-humble opinion. I suspect you'll find LVM isn't all that complex, at least if all you are trying to do is replace GPT. And you get some serious advantages without extra effort, like non-contiguous volumes and snapshotting.
>
> While my copy of gparted won't work with it, there are gui tools to manage LVM. I use kvpm on my gentoo/KDE laptop.

Thanks for all the replies - I will look at lvm...

Jeremy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html