Re: change from raid 5 to raid 6 interrupted

Ok thank you =3DD now it works again. but at very slow speed (~4000kb/s=
)
normally this array brings nearly 70Mb/s.

I tried different performance related stuff, like stripe_cache_size,
readaheadbuffer but nothing could bring better performance.

And i noticed that the newly added drive now is listed as spare
rebuilding. is this normal?

thanks

Raphael

2011/4/23 NeilBrown :
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:23:19 +0100 John Robinson
> wrote:
>
>> (Please always remember to cc the list when replying; cc readded)
>>
>> On 22/04/2011 16:09, Raphael Müller wrote:
>> > Ok i forgot to say, that the backup file is also gone... (my mista=
ke)
>> >
>> > is this backup file the only option i got?
>>
>> Without the backup file you've almost certainly lost some data. I
>> suspect there is a way of restarting the array and reshape without t=
he
>> backup file, but I don't know what it is - you'll have to wait for a
>> proper guru to get back to you with an answer.
>>
>
> With mdadm 3.2.1 there is a new flag "--invalid-backup". =A0It tells =
mdadm that
> you know that the backup file is invalid, but you want it to continue=
anyway
> (and risk having some corrupted data).
>
> You still need to give a backup file, but it can be a newly created e=
mpty
> file.
>
> So:
> =A0# install mdadm 3.2.1
> =A0> /root/my-backup
> =A0mdadm -A /dev/mdthing --backup-file=3D/root/my-backup =A0\
> =A0--invalid-backup /dev/device1 /dev/device2 ....
>
> should get you going again.
>
> NeilBrown
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i=
n
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html