Re: Why move all map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channel to its client?

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:11:05 +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
> >>> I thought map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channels will be handled according
> >>> to the flags passed in prep_slave_sg(). But then i found following patch:
....
> Linus, Dan,
>
> Got it. Thanks for your replies.

JFYI, the old discussion was here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/24/114

---
Atsushi Nemoto